Power Supply
Richard Novak
As I wait to order an 1100GTO, I want to buy and set up the electrical equipment. The mount will be secured to a cart - on an AP 42” Portable Pier. It will carry a load of about 40 pounds: Steallarvue SVX152T, ASI2600MC, guide scope, ASI174MM guide camera, focus motor, Power Box Advance and NUC mini-PC.
I’ve read the messages about power supplies and wiring issues and would like to build the system correctly the first time. The power supplies and block will be attached to a small board which will be hung on the pier or be attached to the legs. I rarely image at temperatures below 30 degrees F.
I’ve attached a simple diagram. I’d like input on these issues: 1 - Is the MFJ (PS138V15A) power supply sufficient for the 1100GTO with my system? 2 – Powerwerx only sells the coaxial plugs with 18 gauge wire so I plan to run 16 gauge wire and connect to about 6 inches of the 18 gauge that is connected to the plugs. Is this overkill and I should just use the 18 gauge all the way back to the distribution block? Are there better options? 3 – Anything else? |
|
On 3/17/2023 8:37 AM, Richard Novak wrote:
1 - Is the MFJ (PS138V15A) power supply sufficient for the 1100GTO with my system?Oh, absolutely! The mount draws only a few amps maximum, and that when slewing at high speed. 2 – Powerwerx only sells the coaxial plugs with 18 gauge wire so I plan to run 16 gauge wire and connect to about 6 inches of the 18 gauge that is connected to the plugs.Is this overkill and I should just use the 18 gauge all the way back to the distribution block?I think #18 is file all the way, given the equipment you show connected to the D-block. #18 copper wire has a resistance of 10.5 ohms per 1,000 feet, so 4 feet would have 0.042 ohms. If your imaging equipment draws, say, 5 amps (might be high; I don't know about your dew heaters), you'd see a voltage drop of 0.21 volts at the Power Box Advance. If you're comfortable with that, go with #18 wire. #18 is fine for the NUC. BTW, I think #10 wire from the power supply to the D-box is waaay overkill. For only 12", you could go with #14 or #16. Hope this helps. --- Mike |
|
Linwood Ferguson
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 09:55 AM, Richard Novak wrote:
Is this overkillIt's hard to have wire too large. :) I've actually got 14AWG in places you have 16AWG, but 16AWG should be fine. The one thing I would suggest is connect the common (black, negative) together between the two power supplies. This ensures any floating voltage on the output side is tied to the same reference and (for example) if you had a USB cable between CP4 and NUC, the shield on the USB will then not carry current and so will have less noise (and with that said, I recommend not using USB but use ethernet to the CP4 for all sorts of reasons). Whether this is really needed depends on exactly how and if the power supplies ground their output or let it float, but generally speaking it can never hurt, and may help. It's also important if you ever used two batteries instead of two power supplies. What I did was set up two of the powerpole distribution blocks, one for the mount, one for everything else (you can see below). While used with power supplies the mount one is is not really "distributing" anything (well, other than the common tie), it does give you a quick way to move power around, say to switch to one battery powering both, or if one power supply fails you can power both by tying them together. It looks a bit ugly as I velcro everything to the tripod, not screw it in; the blocks are mounted on a piece of plastic that started life as a cutting board. Avoiding holes in my nice wood tripod. I also have fuses in the feed wires (not shown), but some people get the larger distribution blocks where each connection has its own fuse. The power supplies have over-current protection so fuses may not really be required but old habits die hard. There is also a powerwerx power supply with powerpole outputs if you want to avoid the banana plugs or screw-on (both of which have a way of working loose). I think AP has it on their site as well. But these look fine and nice and tiny, just check that they are screwed down periodically. The other thing i would consider is a travel router, though it depends on your networking setup. If you ever plan to take this away from your home network it would provide an access point to which to connect. Even at home, a lot of people find that wifi in NUC's (depending on the NUC) have poor range. I have had good luck with a travel router to provide connectivity, and just use a short ethernet cable to go to the NUC (and the CP4). Final comment - I have three of the Pocket Powerbox Advances (one on each OTA), so I like them, but they have one real "gotcha". In the dark, at night (or even in the daytime when you might be looking at it upside down).... the power input and the variable voltage output are in the exact same place on opposite sides. If you accidentally plug the input into the output it smokes. I have done it, quite a few people have done it. That output is primarily for something like a DSLR. I suggest covering the variable output with gaffer tape, it will save your PPBAdv a trip to Greece. Linwood |
|
Richard Novak
Thanks for all the input.
After plugging the power supply into the variable voltage socket on my first Pocket Powerbox, I taped the socket. Surprisingly, there was no damage. I taped the socket as soon as the new one arrived. Pegasus should either ship already taped or have different plug sizes. I'll follow all the suggestions. I especially like the second D-block. |
|
>>> After plugging the power supply into the variable voltage socket on my first Pocket Powerbox I have done that too. It’s so easy. Good idea to tape it On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 11:25 AM Richard Novak <rfnovak11@...> wrote: Thanks for all the input. --
Brian Brian Valente astro portfolio https://www.brianvalentephotography.com/astrophotography/ portfolio brianvalentephotography.com |
|
DFisch
Would you then recommend that your two PowerWerx PD8 blocks get a common ground if powered by two sources? Tom On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 14:30 Brian Valente <bvalente@...> wrote:
--
TJF MOBILE |
|
Hi Richard
If you set up your gear in the same spot every time you may want to consider grounding your pier. I sank one of those 10 ft ground rods right under my pier and have a cable that attaches to the base of the pier. It is (somewhat) visible in the photo. The ground rod is underneath that green valve box cover. Hopefully, the soil is not rocky where you live. Mike |
|
Harley Davidson
Very interesting Mike.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I have several spots on my property that I setup on. This is a great idea that I could put these grounding rods at those locations. 1---Shall I assume that you "pull" the cover to expose the ground rod which is below the grass surface to facilitate cutting grass? Although from your picture it doesn't look like the cover needs to be pulled. 2---Could I just do the same but without the cover? Your thoughts? 3---Would you have the cover brand name and model number? 4---What gauge wire do you recommend? Yours appears to be 14 or 16 gauge? I have plenty of stranded 12 gauge wire. 5---Does the wire connect to the grounding rod by an alligator clip for easy attachment and removal? I have clay soil but with all the wet weather I've had now is the time to do it. thanks tony On 3/17/2023 8:45 PM, M Hambrick wrote:
Hi Richard |
|
ROBERT WYNNE
I don't believe upsizing a portion of a circuit to a heavier gage wire is advisable or effective. The main reason being is that you are always limited by the weakest link in the electrical circuit - the 16 gage wire. -Best, Robert
|
|
Greg McCall
I don't think it's about any limitation as such which to me implies current limits. In these cases, it's about voltage drop and making sure any gear being operated does not fall below the desired voltage under it's full load (which you can measure to check) I also agree with other comments where the resistance and appropriate voltage drop has been calculated and the comments re length of the run. (the shorter the run, the thinner cable you can get away with) I see no issue regarding upsizing other than the cost of cable or the practicalities of having connectors on too thick a wire. Cables should have fuses to protect the source from a cable fault such as a short circuit. While a limited current source may sound OK, it's not a substitute for some form of fusing (close or at the source). Worse case, having a current limited may protect the power supply but say worse case with a short and using a cable on the thinner side which might not handle the protected current without heating up so the cable could eventually heat up enough to start a fire so why take the chance? BTW, fuses protect the cable and not the downstream gear. On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:51 PM ROBERT WYNNE <robert-wynne@...> wrote:
|
|
Greg McCall
If you are using a MAINS supply and your power supply's earth is connected somehow with the 12v negative, depending on the county and how your electricity supply is wired, I would not automatically ground your gear as you may inadvertently cause ground loops. Unless you know for sure it is safe in your MAINS (which is what we call our AC supply from the street) countries wiring, it's safer not too. (I also can't see a reason to want to do it either, even if you just used a stand-alone battery) On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:23 PM Harley Davidson <astrocnc@...> wrote:
|
|
Hi Tony
To your questions: Although 12-gauge wire will work, I used a 4-gauge grounding cable because I happened to have a piece about 3 feet long. The clamp that attaches to the grounding rod is designed for the heavier grounding cables that are used in residential installations. It is attached. with a wrench. The end that attaches to the pier is a crimp-on copper ring terminal designed for 4-gauge wire with a 1/4" ID ring. I also got it at Home Depot. I have a 1/4" brass bolt attached to the pier for connecting the ground cable. Yes, you have to remove the cover to get to the grounding cable. I pull the cover off, get the cable, and run it through the hole, then attach the cable to the pier with a 7/16" wrench. The whole process takes less than a minute. I got the valve box with cover at Home Depot (see below). I keep the ground cable permanently attached to the grounding rod. The cable is about 3 feet long, and I just coil it up and put it in the valve box when I am not using it. I buried the grounding rod about 6 inches below ground level and dug out the dirt to install the valve box. I keep a rubber stopper in the hole when I am not using it. This keeps the "critters" from making a home in the dark space under the cover. There are a number of You-Tube videos that demonstrate how to bury a 10 ft long ground cable. The best one I saw had you starting by just jamming the ground rod into the ground, removing it, and filling the hole with water. Then repeat the process until it is buried as deep as you want. I was amazed at how fast it was. It took less than 5 minutes to sink a 10 ft rod to about 6 inches below the surface, but there are absolutely no rocks in the soil where I live. Mike |
|
Harley Davidson
THANKS for this detailed information Mike.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I in fact myself years ago put a grounding rod in when I updated my electric service box. I used a 3 lb hand drilling hammer to put it in the ground, very easy. The clamp is the very same I used. And like you said only takes an extra minute to connect so I will do the same. tony On 3/17/2023 11:48 PM, M Hambrick
wrote:
Hi Tony |
|
DFisch
Mike what a great share. Simple concrept but the solution is so clear when you write a great recipe, thanks! Tom On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 10:33 Harley Davidson <astrocnc@...> wrote:
--
TJF MOBILE |
|
Linwood Ferguson
I think it is worth highlighting Greg's post and asking what problem you are trying to solve by using a separate earth ground at the tripod? |
|
Hi Linwood
I am not sure I understand anything you said. There was a thread on the forum a while back where it was suggested that some issues that someone was having might be due to grounding. The suggestion to ground the pier or tripod was along the lines of "It may not solve the problem, but it will not hurt anything either". Mike |
|
Linwood Ferguson
On Sat, Mar 18, 2023 at 12:46 PM, M Hambrick wrote:
There was a thread on the forum a while back where it was suggested that some issues that someone was having might be due to grounding. The suggestion to ground the pier or tripod was along the lines of "It may not solve the problem, but it will not hurt anything either".Hopefully someone more knowledgeable about both code and noise can answer more fully. I am sure that bonding DC common's together fall into that category (may not help, won't hurt). Earth grounding in different physical locations when there is also a grounding conductor between them is more complicated. Anyone with credentials or knowledge in this area care to dive in? Linwood |
|
Jeffc
No credentials here.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
My understanding is you can have a ground loop problem (current through the ground) if the ground rods of (for example) the house and ground rods used by other equipment is not “bonded” (ie the ground rods are not connected with an electrical conductor.) I have this problem now with one of the ham antennas here. The antenna support mast is effectively “grounded”. When I disconnect the antenna coax, there’s a small current between the coax shield and the antenna mast. The only time I “notice” this current is if I have my hand on the mast and touch the disconnected coax outer part of the connector. (There’s a small tingle.) That coax shield goes back to the radio, and the radio is bonded to another ground on the other side of the property. (It’s an unfortunate setup.) As for the portable pier… I assume there’s a house there with property grounded electric. With the portable pier in the backyard, if it is self powered (eg battery) then there’s no other path back to other (house) ground rod system. Afaict no problem. If the portable pier equipment is powered by AC from the house electric (eg AC/DC power supply) , and that equipment is grounded at the pier (only), then I think you can have a ground loop between house and pier. The two ground rods (house and pier) should be tied together somehow. Probably what’s going on is the electric run to the pier has a ground wire (all modern wiring does afaict). Perhaps the pier ground rod is tied to that electrical supply ground which then ties the ground rods together. (Tho I’ve always seen the bonding shown as a separate wire buried in the ground connected directly to the rods.) HOWEVER: A) if you are installing an outlet in the backyard somewhere you should be using a licensed electrician. B) Said licensed electrician can provide the proper locality code requirements for grounding, and do the job correctly. Seems to me running permanent AC to a pier in the backyard would be the same as installing AC outlets outside, or in an outbuilding. Now if the ground rod is only attached to the pier… I would wonder why. I could see that if there was something fluke RF going on, or concerns about lightning or static electricity. But in that case I would want to make sure the electrical ground (AC or AC/DC) is isolated from that ground. Just my opinion. Not advice. On Mar 18, 2023, at 10:02 AM, ap@... wrote:
|
|
Well, this is all very interesting discussion. Thanks for the comments Greg, Jeff, and Linwood
The AC power to the house is properly grounded. When I am set up in the back yard, I am running off of two of the Powerwerx 25 Amp variable voltage power supplies that are plugged into an AC outlet at the house. Each power supply feeds into a RigRunner that is attached to the pier. You can see one of the RigRunners in the photo that I posted above. One of the RigRunners supplies power to the mount and camera(s), and the other powers all of the other equipment (dew heaters, laptop, etc). The ground rod that I sunk next to where I set up my pier is not connected to the ground rod at the house. Based on the comments above, it sounds like there is no need to connect my pier to the ground rod, and in fact, doing so could cause more harm than good. Is my understanding of this correct ? Mike |
|
Linwood Ferguson
On Sun, Mar 19, 2023 at 09:04 AM, M Hambrick wrote:
Based on the comments above, it sounds like there is no need to connect my pier to the ground rod, and in fact, doing so could cause more harm than good. Is my understanding of this correct ? My goal was to raise the issue more than say I knew the definitive answer, hoping someone would definitively say. |
|