Happy New Year from AstroPhysics - 2 new tutorial videos!


 

Hello fellow Astronuts

Interested in Dec Arc Modeling?
Want to know how to use the AP NINA tools for on-the-fly model building?

You're in luck! 
Astro-Physics has two new tutorial videos for you covering Dec Arc Modeling

It's a two-parter:

Part 1 details using APCC and APPM for Dec Arc Modeling

Part 2 covers using NINA and the AP Tools plugin to automate Dec Arc Modeling 'on the fly". 

Part 2 features our very own Wade Hilmo explaining how he uses NINA and the AP Tools plugin to automate his sessions. It's an excellent and well presented demonstration. Thanks a million Wade! 

As a bonus, you can also download his NINA auto sequencer template he uses in the video (link in the description). The provided template makes it so easy to get up to speed. 


As always, we continue to work on new educational materials and videos, so please consider subscribing to the AP YouTube channel and turning on the Notify bell. 

If you have requests for other topics or content, please reply here or drop a line to AP!


Brian 


Matthew Hughes
 

Just watched them both. Very informative thanks.
just one question though (well two). Why do you still use PHD2?
isn't unguided imaging what been setup with Dec Arc model?
does guiding enhance the tracking quality? 

also is the sidereal rate now custom?
Best regards, in confused state,

Matt


W Hilmo
 

I have plans to potentially eliminate guiding at some point in the future.  It's not a priority, since I'm set up to guide all the time (I have an OAG and guide camera permanently attached to each of my imaging cameras).  It is literally zero effort to guide.

I've been running down some other problems that have been a bigger priority.  I live in an area with high winds (at any time of day or night).  I'm about 2.5 miles away from a wind farm, and boy did they find a good place for the farm.  20mph to 30mph winds are quite common, even over night.  I've pretty well nailed down the weaknesses in my setup, so that it's now pretty resilient to the wind.  But it took a while to get here.

But we had a great stretch of about 90 clear nights through the summer and fall.  I found myself so productive, especially after troubleshooting and managing the wind effects, that I wasn't motivated to do more testing and experimentation.  I just wanted to spend some time gathering usable data.

I would note that there's nothing wrong with running the guider, even with very accurate tracking.  I have PHD2 configured to wait a decent amount of time between guide corrections.  So the guider isn't actually doing much.  When I'm feeling like I want to tweak things again, I'll probably switch to unguided for testing.

I would note, though, that I don't yet have an observatory with a pier that's set deep into the ground.  I am using a portable field pier, set on top of the ground.  Part of my wind mitigation was adding paver stones with a fairly deep footing of packed sand.  I'm probably close to the frost line, but not deep enough to fully avoid frost heave.  We've not had any good imaging nights yet this winter, but I suspect that frost heave could potentially affect the polar alignment through the night, depending on the temperature and rate of change.  The guider will correct for this.

As for the rates, the tracking model sets custom rates.  You can see the custom rates on the screen in APCC.

On 12/30/22 17:24, Matthew Hughes wrote:

Just watched them both. Very informative thanks.
just one question though (well two). Why do you still use PHD2?
isn't unguided imaging what been setup with Dec Arc model?
does guiding enhance the tracking quality? 

also is the sidereal rate now custom?
Best regards, in confused state,

Matt



 

Hi Matt

>>> Why do you still use PHD2? isn't unguided imaging what been setup with Dec Arc model?

Short answer is it depends but there are reasons you might choose unguided or guided. This video does a good job of explaining the options: https://youtu.be/vhHGYYtL6BM

Either way,  sky modeling greatly improves tracking  


>>>also is the sidereal rate now custom?
Sidereal is sidereal. However, when a model is active, the rate is custom since the model is now adjusting the tracking rate with sky position (likely in both ra and dec)


Brian

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 5:24 PM Matthew Hughes <hughesy72@...> wrote:

Just watched them both. Very informative thanks.
just one question though (well two). Why do you still use PHD2?
isn't unguided imaging what been setup with Dec Arc model?
does guiding enhance the tracking quality? 

also is the sidereal rate now custom?
Best regards, in confused state,

Matt




midmoastro
 

On Fri, Dec 30, 2022 at 02:54 PM, Brian Valente wrote:
https://youtu.be/wL-hpGQxCGw
Brian/Wade/AP,

Thank you for putting this together. Very much appreciated!
Todd