AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


Bill Long
 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4
 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

That’s good to know, and I just saw the detailed “what’s included” list shows the CBAPT”.   Good.  But that it attaches to the mount is a bit at odds with page 16 of the CP4 manual, which says:

 

When using the 400GTO, 600EGTO, Mach1GTO, 1100GTO and some

of the OEM mounts that use the AP Servo Drive System, the GTOCP4 is not directly

attached to the mount, but instead it is mounted onto a bracket that is then affixed to

the tripod or pier.

 

So the bolts that hold the base to the Berlebach plate will be what the CBAPT attach to?   Or it does attach to the 1100 itself?

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:35 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


Bill Long
 

The back of the 1100 itself. I will get you a photo here in a few. 🙂 I use the Losmandy HD and the 119FSA which is basically what the adapter you showed is.


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:44 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4
 

That’s good to know, and I just saw the detailed “what’s included” list shows the CBAPT”.   Good.  But that it attaches to the mount is a bit at odds with page 16 of the CP4 manual, which says:

 

When using the 400GTO, 600EGTO, Mach1GTO, 1100GTO and some

of the OEM mounts that use the AP Servo Drive System, the GTOCP4 is not directly

attached to the mount, but instead it is mounted onto a bracket that is then affixed to

the tripod or pier.

 

So the bolts that hold the base to the Berlebach plate will be what the CBAPT attach to?   Or it does attach to the 1100 itself?

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:35 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

That’s OK no need to bother, so long as I do not need to buy anything else, I’m OK and will figure it out with hardware in hand.  I didn’t mean to sound like I did not believe you, trying to follow along in the manual.

 

With so much stuff backordered, just trying to be ahead of the game.

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:53 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The back of the 1100 itself. I will get you a photo here in a few. 🙂 I use the Losmandy HD and the 119FSA which is basically what the adapter you showed is.

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:44 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

That’s good to know, and I just saw the detailed “what’s included” list shows the CBAPT”.   Good.  But that it attaches to the mount is a bit at odds with page 16 of the CP4 manual, which says:

 

When using the 400GTO, 600EGTO, Mach1GTO, 1100GTO and some

of the OEM mounts that use the AP Servo Drive System, the GTOCP4 is not directly

attached to the mount, but instead it is mounted onto a bracket that is then affixed to

the tripod or pier.

 

So the bolts that hold the base to the Berlebach plate will be what the CBAPT attach to?   Or it does attach to the 1100 itself?

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:35 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


Bill Long
 

It's no bother.



From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:59 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4
 

That’s OK no need to bother, so long as I do not need to buy anything else, I’m OK and will figure it out with hardware in hand.  I didn’t mean to sound like I did not believe you, trying to follow along in the manual.

 

With so much stuff backordered, just trying to be ahead of the game.

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:53 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The back of the 1100 itself. I will get you a photo here in a few. 🙂 I use the Losmandy HD and the 119FSA which is basically what the adapter you showed is.

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:44 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

That’s good to know, and I just saw the detailed “what’s included” list shows the CBAPT”.   Good.  But that it attaches to the mount is a bit at odds with page 16 of the CP4 manual, which says:

 

When using the 400GTO, 600EGTO, Mach1GTO, 1100GTO and some

of the OEM mounts that use the AP Servo Drive System, the GTOCP4 is not directly

attached to the mount, but instead it is mounted onto a bracket that is then affixed to

the tripod or pier.

 

So the bolts that hold the base to the Berlebach plate will be what the CBAPT attach to?   Or it does attach to the 1100 itself?

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:35 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

Thank you, that helps.

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 8:08 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

It's no bother.

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:59 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

That’s OK no need to bother, so long as I do not need to buy anything else, I’m OK and will figure it out with hardware in hand.  I didn’t mean to sound like I did not believe you, trying to follow along in the manual.

 

With so much stuff backordered, just trying to be ahead of the game.

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:53 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The back of the 1100 itself. I will get you a photo here in a few. 🙂 I use the Losmandy HD and the 119FSA which is basically what the adapter you showed is.

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:44 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

That’s good to know, and I just saw the detailed “what’s included” list shows the CBAPT”.   Good.  But that it attaches to the mount is a bit at odds with page 16 of the CP4 manual, which says:

 

When using the 400GTO, 600EGTO, Mach1GTO, 1100GTO and some

of the OEM mounts that use the AP Servo Drive System, the GTOCP4 is not directly

attached to the mount, but instead it is mounted onto a bracket that is then affixed to

the tripod or pier.

 

So the bolts that hold the base to the Berlebach plate will be what the CBAPT attach to?   Or it does attach to the 1100 itself?

 

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long via groups.io
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 7:35 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

The pier adapter for the CP4 comes with the mount.  It will connect to the backside of the 1100 with two screws. So you will drop the RA axis onto the adapter you pictured, secure that with the bolts on the side, then bolt the CP4 box on the back of the mount itself. 

 


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 4:30 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

 

I am anticipating a AP 1100 in a few months, and have that plate on order for my Berlebach Planet tripod.   From their website it looks like the attached.

 

There is a “Pier/Tripod Control Box Adapter” that shows as an angled bracket for attaching to a tripod.    The CP4 manual indicates the 1100 needs something on which to attach the CP4.  The 1100 manual on the other hand, on page 8, is a little confusing as it shows two screws for the CP4, but on the left hand page mentions “& adapter”.   So I think the adapter is there.  Maybe. 

 

Does anyone have this mount on a Planet, specifically one with the Berlebach plate? 

 

Will I need the adapter?   I’m thinking yes.

 

Will that top hole on the adapter (the one on the bent piece of metal) attach to a screw that’s going to go into one of the four holes below?  Or am I going to need something else with which to attach either the CP4 itself, or the adapter?    Will just that one screw hold it?

 

I am hoping not to drill holes in the wooden legs.

 

But even more, I want to make sure when I get it, I have all the parts.  Be a shame to then wait weeks to order some minor but necessary part.  L

 

Linwood

 

 

 


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

As a follow on question with a Berlebach planet.

I received the mounting ring from Berlebach, and it emphasized how large the base of the AP1100 will be in comparison to this tripod.

I do not plan to have more than about 45 pounds of OTA, and counterweights of course. 

Does anyone with a similar setup have any kind of idea where the center of gravity is for that kind of setup?  Specifically how far off center?  

I typically image with the legs retracted fully for stability, and legs at closest are 9.5" (between legs) and 17" (at a single leg) from center.  I prefer to image with the single leg south not north, this provides a LOT more clearance (at least on my MyT) near zenith to avoid leg crashes.  But when I looked at that 9.5" it made me worry, this is a larger mount and probably different CG.

I found the Dimension Calculator spreadsheet, clearly aimed at clearance not load.  But I think (emphasis on think) that the point in the first image labeled as offset B, represents the BALANCED CG, basically at the intersection with the DEC axis.  

But what I am worried about is the unbalanced CG -- the point at which I have loaded 50# or so of counterweights and have yet to attach the OTA.  I.e. the situation why everyone says "put the single leg under the counterweight shaft".  Which is good advice I hope to not have to take so I don't hit the legs with my imaging train.

This all works fine on the MyT, it is quite stable.  But worried -- am I in for a rude surprise with the larger AP1100 (with 45# load)?  Yes, this is easy to figure out once I get it -- but if I need a new tripod/pier I'd like to get it on order now.

Anyone know where the CG is going to land?   And yes, I realize it's latitude dependent (I'm at 26d) but any real world experience welcome.

Linwood


Roland Christen
 

Whether you put the 3rd leg pointing North or pointing South, the clearance of the other two legs will be about the same. In fact, you will have slightly more clearance for the telescopes when pointing at the zenith because the 1100 Dec axis hangs more northward of center. It is also the most stable condition for the mount with just counterweights attached.

Roland

-----Original Message-----
From: ap@... <ap@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Tue, May 18, 2021 10:54 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

As a follow on question with a Berlebach planet.

I received the mounting ring from Berlebach, and it emphasized how large the base of the AP1100 will be in comparison to this tripod.

I do not plan to have more than about 45 pounds of OTA, and counterweights of course. 

Does anyone with a similar setup have any kind of idea where the center of gravity is for that kind of setup?  Specifically how far off center?  

I typically image with the legs retracted fully for stability, and legs at closest are 9.5" (between legs) and 17" (at a single leg) from center.  I prefer to image with the single leg south not north, this provides a LOT more clearance (at least on my MyT) near zenith to avoid leg crashes.  But when I looked at that 9.5" it made me worry, this is a larger mount and probably different CG.

I found the Dimension Calculator spreadsheet, clearly aimed at clearance not load.  But I think (emphasis on think) that the point in the first image labeled as offset B, represents the BALANCED CG, basically at the intersection with the DEC axis.  

But what I am worried about is the unbalanced CG -- the point at which I have loaded 50# or so of counterweights and have yet to attach the OTA.  I.e. the situation why everyone says "put the single leg under the counterweight shaft".  Which is good advice I hope to not have to take so I don't hit the legs with my imaging train.

This all works fine on the MyT, it is quite stable.  But worried -- am I in for a rude surprise with the larger AP1100 (with 45# load)?  Yes, this is easy to figure out once I get it -- but if I need a new tripod/pier I'd like to get it on order now.

Anyone know where the CG is going to land?   And yes, I realize it's latitude dependent (I'm at 26d) but any real world experience welcome.

Linwood

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

>>> Roland said:

 

Whether you put the 3rd leg pointing North or pointing South, the clearance of the other two legs will be about the same. In fact, you will have slightly more clearance for the telescopes when pointing at the zenith because the 1100 Dec axis hangs more northward of center. It is also the most stable condition for the mount with just counterweights attached.

 

That would be great if the clearance is better, as I do not really WANT to put the single leg south.  But with both my old CEM70G and current MyT that did give me several inches more clearance, enough I had no risk of collision (so long as I paid a bit of attention to rotation angle of the filter wheel), but definitely had collisions otherwise.

 

But if I can put the single leg North and still not have a collision issue, that would be terrific, as that almost doubles the available supported CG position.

 

Thank you.

 


Roland Christen
 

I should have added that with the 3rd leg pointed northward, there is slightly more clearance for the telescope when it is pointing to the zenith.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: Roland Christen via groups.io <chris1011@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Sent: Tue, May 18, 2021 11:18 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

Whether you put the 3rd leg pointing North or pointing South, the clearance of the other two legs will be about the same. In fact, you will have slightly more clearance for the telescopes when pointing at the zenith because the 1100 Dec axis hangs more northward of center. It is also the most stable condition for the mount with just counterweights attached.

Roland

-----Original Message-----
From: ap@... <ap@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Tue, May 18, 2021 10:54 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

As a follow on question with a Berlebach planet.

I received the mounting ring from Berlebach, and it emphasized how large the base of the AP1100 will be in comparison to this tripod.

I do not plan to have more than about 45 pounds of OTA, and counterweights of course. 

Does anyone with a similar setup have any kind of idea where the center of gravity is for that kind of setup?  Specifically how far off center?  

I typically image with the legs retracted fully for stability, and legs at closest are 9.5" (between legs) and 17" (at a single leg) from center.  I prefer to image with the single leg south not north, this provides a LOT more clearance (at least on my MyT) near zenith to avoid leg crashes.  But when I looked at that 9.5" it made me worry, this is a larger mount and probably different CG.

I found the Dimension Calculator spreadsheet, clearly aimed at clearance not load.  But I think (emphasis on think) that the point in the first image labeled as offset B, represents the BALANCED CG, basically at the intersection with the DEC axis.  

But what I am worried about is the unbalanced CG -- the point at which I have loaded 50# or so of counterweights and have yet to attach the OTA.  I.e. the situation why everyone says "put the single leg under the counterweight shaft".  Which is good advice I hope to not have to take so I don't hit the legs with my imaging train.

This all works fine on the MyT, it is quite stable.  But worried -- am I in for a rude surprise with the larger AP1100 (with 45# load)?  Yes, this is easy to figure out once I get it -- but if I need a new tripod/pier I'd like to get it on order now.

Anyone know where the CG is going to land?   And yes, I realize it's latitude dependent (I'm at 26d) but any real world experience welcome.

Linwood

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Roland Christen
 

I have both an 1100 and a tripod so I will set them up and see what the clearances are both ways.

Roland

-----Original Message-----
From: ap@... <ap@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Sent: Tue, May 18, 2021 11:47 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4

>>> Roland said:
 
Whether you put the 3rd leg pointing North or pointing South, the clearance of the other two legs will be about the same. In fact, you will have slightly more clearance for the telescopes when pointing at the zenith because the 1100 Dec axis hangs more northward of center. It is also the most stable condition for the mount with just counterweights attached.
 
That would be great if the clearance is better, as I do not really WANT to put the single leg south.  But with both my old CEM70G and current MyT that did give me several inches more clearance, enough I had no risk of collision (so long as I paid a bit of attention to rotation angle of the filter wheel), but definitely had collisions otherwise.
 
But if I can put the single leg North and still not have a collision issue, that would be terrific, as that almost doubles the available supported CG position.
 
Thank you.
 

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

  • I have both an 1100 and a tripod so I will set them up and see what the clearances are both ways.

 

While I certainly appreciate any info, please do not go to a lot of trouble.   You guys have a lot on your plates!

 


ap@CaptivePhotons.com
 

This is an old topic but now that I know how it works, I thought I would put some closure to it.

I got the AP1100, and it worked, first try, out of the box - no issues at all.  Ethernet connection, drivers worked, NINA connected to it, all good.  Now that's indoors as weather is not good but of three prior mounts this was by FAR the simplest to get working out of the boxes.

Anyway... 

The mating with the Planet was not so easy.  If you look at the photo on the first posting in this thread, it has the Berlebach custom AP1100 base.  It fits perfectly, in terms of the circular base, and all the holes line up, but... 

The screws from AP are WAY too short, or more precisely the thickness of the Berlebach base must be at a lot thicker, the screws will not even reach the holes. Trip to the hardware store mostly fixed it (had to get hex head not socket, but have some socket heads on order). 

This thickness also throws off the CP4 mount, especially since a screw hole hits exactly in the middle of the CP4 mount.  Basically you can't get the mount plate close enough to the mount base as the tripod base is too thick.  Leaving the screw (one of 6) out lets you mount it but it still is not flat -- I've got longer screws on order and some plastic spacers. 

But bottom line -- the custom Berlebach base is massively heavy duty and well built, but causes some (fixable) issues when you go to put it together.  Berlebach could fix that with a couple dollars worth of hardware accompanying the base.  It almost seems like they never actually tried it.

Anyway... 

The really good news is that the AP1100 is quite a bit larger than my MyT and positioned differently, and so I ended up with quite a bit more leg clearance -- my guess is I could go about an hour past transit without a leg crash.

The other aspect of this news is this: on the MyT I had more leg clearance with the counterweight between two legs, not over a leg.  It also was closer to the center of the tripod, and this did not cause an issue while loading counterweights.  On the AP1100 I can't mount it that way, it hangs out too far, when loading counterweights I think it would tip over (it's fine with it over the North leg).  But this became moot because the same over-hang also provided a lot more clearance, so there was no need to mount it backwards -- plenty of room in the standard configuration.  Lots of room.

Still got a lot to do, but it's going to work fine, with a bit of accomodation. 

Oh... one more issue not tripod related (below) 



There was one surprise -- my refractor doesn't clear the RAPAS over quite a bit of its rotation angle.  When balanced the OAG lands directly over it.  Sideways it's fine, but either camera down, or certainly filterwheel down, it's a problem.



I'm going to get taller standoffs for the rings to raise it up.  I may also decide to put front weights on the dovetail so I can slide the OTA further back, but that just brings back some of the leg crash issues, so I think raising the OTA will at least solve the camera direction.  I can live with keeping the filter wheel not down, there's still about 270 degrees of rotation that won't hit.  I guess back weights and sliding forward is possible also, but no good place to mount those.

Anyway.... while some integration pains, I can't tell you how pleased I am that it all just came together and worked as soon as I fired up the software.

C11 sizing tomorrow, but I think that one is easier, as it is naturally taller. 

Now if only there was some clear skies. 

Linwood


Peter Nagy
 

Never leave RAPAS into the mount after finishing polar alignment. I guarantee you at least one of the cables will get caught. It happened to me when USB cable got caught during high speed slewing and ripped out the USB socket of SX Ultrastar guide camera connected to OAG.

Peter 


Woody Schlom
 

I just remove the RAPAS after PA.  Cables want to hang up on it anyway.

Woody 

On July 28, 2021 8:08:13 PM "ap@..." <ap@...> wrote:

This is an old topic but now that I know how it works, I thought I would put some closure to it.

I got the AP1100, and it worked, first try, out of the box - no issues at all.  Ethernet connection, drivers worked, NINA connected to it, all good.  Now that's indoors as weather is not good but of three prior mounts this was by FAR the simplest to get working out of the boxes.

Anyway... 

The mating with the Planet was not so easy.  If you look at the photo on the first posting in this thread, it has the Berlebach custom AP1100 base.  It fits perfectly, in terms of the circular base, and all the holes line up, but... 

The screws from AP are WAY too short, or more precisely the thickness of the Berlebach base must be at a lot thicker, the screws will not even reach the holes. Trip to the hardware store mostly fixed it (had to get hex head not socket, but have some socket heads on order). 

This thickness also throws off the CP4 mount, especially since a screw hole hits exactly in the middle of the CP4 mount.  Basically you can't get the mount plate close enough to the mount base as the tripod base is too thick.  Leaving the screw (one of 6) out lets you mount it but it still is not flat -- I've got longer screws on order and some plastic spacers. 

But bottom line -- the custom Berlebach base is massively heavy duty and well built, but causes some (fixable) issues when you go to put it together.  Berlebach could fix that with a couple dollars worth of hardware accompanying the base.  It almost seems like they never actually tried it.

Anyway... 

The really good news is that the AP1100 is quite a bit larger than my MyT and positioned differently, and so I ended up with quite a bit more leg clearance -- my guess is I could go about an hour past transit without a leg crash.

The other aspect of this news is this: on the MyT I had more leg clearance with the counterweight between two legs, not over a leg.  It also was closer to the center of the tripod, and this did not cause an issue while loading counterweights.  On the AP1100 I can't mount it that way, it hangs out too far, when loading counterweights I think it would tip over (it's fine with it over the North leg).  But this became moot because the same over-hang also provided a lot more clearance, so there was no need to mount it backwards -- plenty of room in the standard configuration.  Lots of room.

Still got a lot to do, but it's going to work fine, with a bit of accomodation. 

Oh... one more issue not tripod related (below) 



There was one surprise -- my refractor doesn't clear the RAPAS over quite a bit of its rotation angle.  When balanced the OAG lands directly over it.  Sideways it's fine, but either camera down, or certainly filterwheel down, it's a problem.



I'm going to get taller standoffs for the rings to raise it up.  I may also decide to put front weights on the dovetail so I can slide the OTA further back, but that just brings back some of the leg crash issues, so I think raising the OTA will at least solve the camera direction.  I can live with keeping the filter wheel not down, there's still about 270 degrees of rotation that won't hit.  I guess back weights and sliding forward is possible also, but no good place to mount those.

Anyway.... while some integration pains, I can't tell you how pleased I am that it all just came together and worked as soon as I fired up the software.

C11 sizing tomorrow, but I think that one is easier, as it is naturally taller. 

Now if only there was some clear skies. 

Linwood



Jeffc
 

I have and use a Rapas… when I’m observing visually and have no computer.  

When imaging, I use a polemaster and sharpcap to do polar alignment.    I’m curious which method allows for a “more precise” alignment; I assumed the polemaster+sharpcap.   

Both approaches are certainly very quick.  



On Jul 28, 2021, at 9:12 PM, Woody Schlom <woody_is@...> wrote:


I just remove the RAPAS after PA.  Cables want to hang up on it anyway.

Woody 

On July 28, 2021 8:08:13 PM "ap@..." <ap@...> wrote:

This is an old topic but now that I know how it works, I thought I would put some closure to it.

I got the AP1100, and it worked, first try, out of the box - no issues at all.  Ethernet connection, drivers worked, NINA connected to it, all good.  Now that's indoors as weather is not good but of three prior mounts this was by FAR the simplest to get working out of the boxes.

Anyway... 

The mating with the Planet was not so easy.  If you look at the photo on the first posting in this thread, it has the Berlebach custom AP1100 base.  It fits perfectly, in terms of the circular base, and all the holes line up, but... 

The screws from AP are WAY too short, or more precisely the thickness of the Berlebach base must be at a lot thicker, the screws will not even reach the holes. Trip to the hardware store mostly fixed it (had to get hex head not socket, but have some socket heads on order). 

This thickness also throws off the CP4 mount, especially since a screw hole hits exactly in the middle of the CP4 mount.  Basically you can't get the mount plate close enough to the mount base as the tripod base is too thick.  Leaving the screw (one of 6) out lets you mount it but it still is not flat -- I've got longer screws on order and some plastic spacers. 

But bottom line -- the custom Berlebach base is massively heavy duty and well built, but causes some (fixable) issues when you go to put it together.  Berlebach could fix that with a couple dollars worth of hardware accompanying the base.  It almost seems like they never actually tried it.

Anyway... 

The really good news is that the AP1100 is quite a bit larger than my MyT and positioned differently, and so I ended up with quite a bit more leg clearance -- my guess is I could go about an hour past transit without a leg crash.

The other aspect of this news is this: on the MyT I had more leg clearance with the counterweight between two legs, not over a leg.  It also was closer to the center of the tripod, and this did not cause an issue while loading counterweights.  On the AP1100 I can't mount it that way, it hangs out too far, when loading counterweights I think it would tip over (it's fine with it over the North leg).  But this became moot because the same over-hang also provided a lot more clearance, so there was no need to mount it backwards -- plenty of room in the standard configuration.  Lots of room.

Still got a lot to do, but it's going to work fine, with a bit of accomodation. 

Oh... one more issue not tripod related (below) 

<ap1100.jpg>


There was one surprise -- my refractor doesn't clear the RAPAS over quite a bit of its rotation angle.  When balanced the OAG lands directly over it.  Sideways it's fine, but either camera down, or certainly filterwheel down, it's a problem.

<rapas.jpg>


I'm going to get taller standoffs for the rings to raise it up.  I may also decide to put front weights on the dovetail so I can slide the OTA further back, but that just brings back some of the leg crash issues, so I think raising the OTA will at least solve the camera direction.  I can live with keeping the filter wheel not down, there's still about 270 degrees of rotation that won't hit.  I guess back weights and sliding forward is possible also, but no good place to mount those.

Anyway.... while some integration pains, I can't tell you how pleased I am that it all just came together and worked as soon as I fired up the software.

C11 sizing tomorrow, but I think that one is easier, as it is naturally taller. 

Now if only there was some clear skies. 

Linwood



Bill Long
 

I just use Sharpcap. If I'm away from the house, rapas plus Sharpcap.


From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Jeffc <jeffcrilly@...>
Sent: Wednesday, July 28, 2021 10:43 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100, Berlebach Planet, mounting CP4
 
I have and use a Rapas… when I’m observing visually and have no computer.  

When imaging, I use a polemaster and sharpcap to do polar alignment.    I’m curious which method allows for a “more precise” alignment; I assumed the polemaster+sharpcap.   

Both approaches are certainly very quick.  



On Jul 28, 2021, at 9:12 PM, Woody Schlom <woody_is@...> wrote:


I just remove the RAPAS after PA.  Cables want to hang up on it anyway.

Woody 

On July 28, 2021 8:08:13 PM "ap@..." <ap@...> wrote:

This is an old topic but now that I know how it works, I thought I would put some closure to it.

I got the AP1100, and it worked, first try, out of the box - no issues at all.  Ethernet connection, drivers worked, NINA connected to it, all good.  Now that's indoors as weather is not good but of three prior mounts this was by FAR the simplest to get working out of the boxes.

Anyway... 

The mating with the Planet was not so easy.  If you look at the photo on the first posting in this thread, it has the Berlebach custom AP1100 base.  It fits perfectly, in terms of the circular base, and all the holes line up, but... 

The screws from AP are WAY too short, or more precisely the thickness of the Berlebach base must be at a lot thicker, the screws will not even reach the holes. Trip to the hardware store mostly fixed it (had to get hex head not socket, but have some socket heads on order). 

This thickness also throws off the CP4 mount, especially since a screw hole hits exactly in the middle of the CP4 mount.  Basically you can't get the mount plate close enough to the mount base as the tripod base is too thick.  Leaving the screw (one of 6) out lets you mount it but it still is not flat -- I've got longer screws on order and some plastic spacers. 

But bottom line -- the custom Berlebach base is massively heavy duty and well built, but causes some (fixable) issues when you go to put it together.  Berlebach could fix that with a couple dollars worth of hardware accompanying the base.  It almost seems like they never actually tried it.

Anyway... 

The really good news is that the AP1100 is quite a bit larger than my MyT and positioned differently, and so I ended up with quite a bit more leg clearance -- my guess is I could go about an hour past transit without a leg crash.

The other aspect of this news is this: on the MyT I had more leg clearance with the counterweight between two legs, not over a leg.  It also was closer to the center of the tripod, and this did not cause an issue while loading counterweights.  On the AP1100 I can't mount it that way, it hangs out too far, when loading counterweights I think it would tip over (it's fine with it over the North leg).  But this became moot because the same over-hang also provided a lot more clearance, so there was no need to mount it backwards -- plenty of room in the standard configuration.  Lots of room.

Still got a lot to do, but it's going to work fine, with a bit of accomodation. 

Oh... one more issue not tripod related (below) 

<ap1100.jpg>


There was one surprise -- my refractor doesn't clear the RAPAS over quite a bit of its rotation angle.  When balanced the OAG lands directly over it.  Sideways it's fine, but either camera down, or certainly filterwheel down, it's a problem.

<rapas.jpg>


I'm going to get taller standoffs for the rings to raise it up.  I may also decide to put front weights on the dovetail so I can slide the OTA further back, but that just brings back some of the leg crash issues, so I think raising the OTA will at least solve the camera direction.  I can live with keeping the filter wheel not down, there's still about 270 degrees of rotation that won't hit.  I guess back weights and sliding forward is possible also, but no good place to mount those.

Anyway.... while some integration pains, I can't tell you how pleased I am that it all just came together and worked as soon as I fired up the software.

C11 sizing tomorrow, but I think that one is easier, as it is naturally taller. 

Now if only there was some clear skies. 

Linwood



fernandorivera3
 

There is absolutely no reason to keep the RAPAS permanently attached to the mount. It is only used for initial polar alignment & once done with the fine tuning/tweaking it is put away until the next session. 

Fernando


M Hambrick
 

Hi Linwood

I agree with all of the comments about the RAPAS. Do not leave it attached. You can do your polar alignment from Park 2 even with the scope attached, but after you have aligned the mount you should remove the RAPAS, otherwise you will be sending it back to A-P for repair or replacement.

Back to the topic of whether you should orient the tripod with the 3rd leg pointed south, I would caution you not to do this. Once you get the scope and counterweights attached, the center of gravity is going to be out beyond the edge of the mount base. It will be unstable.

I will share an experience I had with my 1100 GTO with a 180 EDT scope attached. The mounting holes in my old 8-inch A-P pier are slightly oversized, and I noticed one evening that after the scope and counterweights were installed that the mount base had shifted in the pier. The problem was that once the scope and counterweights were attached, the center of gravity had shifted out beyond the north side of the mount base and was trying to tip the mount and scope out of the pier. The excess clearance in the screw holes had allowed everything to shift even with the screws fully tightened. Take a look at the pictures below. In the picture on the left you can see that the base of the mount was tilted by about 1/16".

I was able to solve this problem by switching to high performance lock washers, but the point is that if you do not have the 3rd tripod leg facing north, your whole rig is liable to tip over.

Mike