Date
1  20 of 23
Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ?
Joe Zeglinski
Hi Marj,
Looking at the new AP1600 picture, the RA axle section (housing) seems truncated shorter than on an AP1200, so the standard cwt bar might also sit a few inches higher up the axle, thus less leverage. In order to be able to actually mount “upto” a gargantuan 220 lb (with accessories) OTA, and in order to still have enough bar space for all its counterweights, have you considered offering an 7inch “diameter” cwt instead of limiting it to the current AP standard 6" (nominal) inch? Based on past calculations, for the same thickness, an 7” diameter cwt should give you a 30 lb weight, or an 8” diameter 40 lb cwt.  in the same space and bar hole diameter – assuming larger stainless steel bar stock is available. However, steel toe construction boots might become a safety accessory for such heavy weights The downside might be that at higher latitude setups, the larger cwt might approach the mount a bit closer, when past the meridian. Joe Z. [Nontext portions of this message have been removed]


divenuts
AND if I could additionally ask. Is the cwt bar the same size as the 1200 and the cwt bar extention that fits the 1200 also fit the 1600.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Thanks, Chuck/divenuts
 Original Message 
From: "Joe Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...> To: <apgto@...> Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:31 PM Subject: [apgto] Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Hi Marj, Looking at the new AP1600 picture, the RA axle section (housing) seems truncated shorter than on an AP1200, so the standard cwt bar might also sit a few inches higher up the axle, thus less leverage. In order to be able to actually mount “upto” a gargantuan 220 lb (with accessories) OTA, and in order to still have enough bar space for all its counterweights, have you considered offering an 7inch “diameter” cwt instead of limiting it to the current AP standard 6" (nominal) inch? Based on past calculations, for the same thickness, an 7” diameter cwt should give you a 30 lb weight, or an 8” diameter 40 lb cwt.  in the same space and bar hole diameter – assuming larger stainless steel bar stock is available. However, steel toe construction boots might become a safety accessory for such heavy weights The downside might be that at higher latitude setups, the larger cwt might approach the mount a bit closer, when past the meridian. Joe Z.  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links


Joe Zeglinski
I should have added  the way around the larger diameter cwt. possibly hitting the mount (at high latitudes). Since it will use the same ID cwt. bar, one could trade off leverage of using a standard 6" cwt. at the UPPER bar, where it might hit the mount, for using the larger diameter (7" or 8") cwts, LOWER down, where they will miss. The larger diameter cwts., slightly lower down, will also quite effectively regain any lost leverage of the smaller 6" diameter cwt. at the top.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Also, if stainless steel bar stock were unavailable, or not be cost effective to special order, consider a line of "Green Counterweights". Let's recycle the lead in those "billions" of dead car batteries, into extraheavy filler, poured into stainless steel cwt. "SHELLS". You might also get more weight/cu in. in the identical dimension solid stainless steel counterweights. Joe Z.
Original Message
From: Joe Zeglinski Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:31 PM To: apgto@... Subject: [apgto] Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Hi Marj, Looking at the new AP1600 picture, the RA axle section (housing) seems truncated shorter than on an AP1200, so the standard cwt bar might also sit a few inches higher up the axle, thus less leverage. In order to be able to actually mount “upto” a gargantuan 220 lb (with accessories) OTA, and in order to still have enough bar space for all its counterweights, have you considered offering an 7inch “diameter” cwt instead of limiting it to the current AP standard 6" (nominal) inch? Based on past calculations, for the same thickness, an 7” diameter cwt should give you a 30 lb weight, or an 8” diameter 40 lb cwt.  in the same space and bar hole diameter – assuming larger stainless steel bar stock is available. However, steel toe construction boots might become a safety accessory for such heavy weights The downside might be that at higher latitude setups, the larger cwt might approach the mount a bit closer, when past the meridian. Joe Z.  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links


Joe Zeglinski
I should have added  the way around the larger diameter cwt. possibly
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
hitting the mount (at high latitudes). Since ALL cwts. will use the same OD cwt. bar, one could trade off leverage of using a standard 6" cwt. at the UPPER bar, where it might hit the mount, for using the larger diameter (7" or 8") cwts, LOWER down, where they will miss. The larger diameter cwts., slightly lower down, will also quite effectively regain any lost leverage of the smaller 6" diameter cwt. at the top. Also, if stainless steel bar stock were unavailable, or not be cost effective to special order, consider a line of "Green Counterweights". Let's recycle the lead in those "billions" of dead car batteries, into extraheavy filler, poured into stainless steel cwt. "SHELLS". You might also get more weight/cu in. in the identical dimension solid stainless steel counterweights. Joe Z.
Original Message
From: Joe Zeglinski Sent: Monday, April 30, 2012 1:31 PM To: apgto@... Subject: [apgto] Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Hi Marj, Looking at the new AP1600 picture, the RA axle section (housing) seems truncated shorter than on an AP1200, so the standard cwt bar might also sit a few inches higher up the axle, thus less leverage. In order to be able to actually mount “upto” a gargantuan 220 lb (with accessories) OTA, and in order to still have enough bar space for all its counterweights, have you considered offering an 7inch “diameter” cwt instead of limiting it to the current AP standard 6" (nominal) inch? Based on past calculations, for the same thickness, an 7” diameter cwt should give you a 30 lb weight, or an 8” diameter 40 lb cwt.  in the same space and bar hole diameter – assuming larger stainless steel bar stock is available. However, steel toe construction boots might become a safety accessory for such heavy weights The downside might be that at higher latitude setups, the larger cwt might approach the mount a bit closer, when past the meridian. Joe Z.  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links


roywellington
Joe,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Balancing 110 pounds on an AP1200 with three weights not all the way out the extender and (eyeballing) space for maybe six more weights (true most would be close in but not all) seems to be quite enough except for one of those squattish 24in RicardiHonders leviathans. This almost certainly means the next RH will be 20in only. Where do I sign up? Roy
 In apgto@..., "Joe Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...> wrote:


Joe Zeglinski
Roy,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Don't see where you got 110 lbs and AP1200. Granted, "old" AP1200 carried that without breaking into a sweat, with bar space to spare. But, my post was actually about the new AP1600, I was actually wondering about fitting 220 lbs. of "counterweights" on the STANDARD bar, to handle new maximum OTA load capacity on the AP1600. I just can't envisage 220 lbs made up from AP18 lb cwts, and still being able to fit on an 18.5" bar. Just as an exercise, to prove it: Using my own "Counterweights Calculator" Spreadsheet, and configuring a 220 lb (20" diameter OTA), on an AP1200 as a standin, (since I don't have dimensions for the AP1600 yet), I found that with just the standard 18.5" bar alone, there is room for just six AP18's  leaving ONLY 1/2 inch of bar to spare. Even with this fully occupied bar, the scope is still 106.33 lbs too heavy! If you want torque value, the 220 lb OTA would still be unbalanced by 1,978.74 inchlbs. So, that is why I can't see a 220 lb scope being able to use the "Standard AP1200 bar" (alone), and still using "Standard" AP counterweights. However, to prove to myself the the benefit of new AP counterweights, I reran my calculations for the fully loaded 220 lb OTA (using AP1200 dimensions as a standin)  BUT this time ... I used the AP (8.75", 6.53 lb) BAR EXTENDER, with "potentially NEW", AP 30 lb (7") & 40 lb (8") counterweights, to see what it might take, to reach near equilibrium for such a heavy max'd out OTA. Surprisingly, a 220 lb OTA would indeed balance, (with all cwts positioned at the BOTTOM of the bar), and using one of these setups: (a) 8 x AP18 lb + one AP10 lb ... Standard + EXD BAR  2.08 lbs cwtheavy, & 1.25" of empty bar remaining at the top  or  (b) 4 x AP30 lb .......................... Standard + EXD BAR  4.72 lbs cwtheavy, & 15.25" of empty bar above all weights.  or  (c) 5 x AP30 lb ........................... Standard + EXD BAR  0.26 lbs cwtheavy, & 7.25" of empty bar above all weights  BUT all cwts. moved up 5" from stop.  or  (d) 5 x AP40 lb + one AP18 lb ... Standard  NO EXD  8.85 lbs cwtheavy, & 0.5" of empty bar to spare at the top of all cwts.  no adjustment space! So, if AP were to manufacture 7" diameter (30 lb) counterweights, just for the "maximum load capacity" AP1600 situation ... then configuration (c), with five of these at middle of the (Extended) bar, would not only perfectly balance a 220 lb (20" diameter) OTA, it would also leave about a total of 12.5" of adjustment space on the bar, for accessories to be added or removed. In fact, if all 5 of these 30lb weights were positioned right at the bottom of the bar, this setup would be enough counterweight to carry & balance another 44.56 lbs of CCD camera at the back of an RC14 shaped OTA. Of course, the OTA load would then be whopping 265 lbs, but Roland's mounts seem to have "extra capacity" beyond spec. NB: In my spreadsheet, I assumed a fictitious 20" diameter 220 lb OTA, mounted on an "AP DOVELM162", for these calculations, with AP1200 "Stiction" & size dimensions, and setup for 44 deg. Latitude. But, the results are indicative of what "might" be achieved. Joe Z.
Original Message
From: roywellington Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 12:37 AM To: apgto@... Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Joe, Balancing 110 pounds on an AP1200 with three weights not all the way out the extender and (eyeballing) space for maybe six more weights (true most would be close in but not all) seems to be quite enough except for one of those squattish 24in RicardiHonders leviathans. This almost certainly means the next RH will be 20in only. Where do I sign up? Roy


fernandorivera3
Hi, Joe
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
FYI, if someone wishes to use heavier counterweights to fit the 1.875" ctw shaft, there are 21.7# weights from Robin Casady, & 40# weights from PlaneWave Instruments, available for purchase. Best regards Fernando Sent from my MOTOROLA ATRIX™ 2 on AT&T
Original message
From: Joe Zeglinski <J.Zeglinski@...> To: apgto@... Sent: Thu, May 3, 2012 08:30:17 GMT+00:00 Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Roy, Don't see where you got 110 lbs and AP1200. Granted, "old" AP1200 carried that without breaking into a sweat, with bar space to spare. But, my post was actually about the new AP1600, I was actually wondering about fitting 220 lbs. of "counterweights" on the STANDARD bar, to handle new maximum OTA load capacity on the AP1600. I just can't envisage 220 lbs made up from AP18 lb cwts, and still being able to fit on an 18.5" bar. Just as an exercise, to prove it: Using my own "Counterweights Calculator" Spreadsheet, and configuring a 220 lb (20" diameter OTA), on an AP1200 as a standin, (since I don't have dimensions for the AP1600 yet), I found that with just the standard 18.5" bar alone, there is room for just six AP18's  leaving ONLY 1/2 inch of bar to spare. Even with this fully occupied bar, the scope is still 106.33 lbs too heavy! If you want torque value, the 220 lb OTA would still be unbalanced by 1,978.74 inchlbs. So, that is why I can't see a 220 lb scope being able to use the "Standard AP1200 bar" (alone), and still using "Standard" AP counterweights. However, to prove to myself the the benefit of new AP counterweights, I reran my calculations for the fully loaded 220 lb OTA (using AP1200 dimensions as a standin)  BUT this time ... I used the AP (8.75", 6.53 lb) BAR EXTENDER, with "potentially NEW", AP 30 lb (7") & 40 lb (8") counterweights, to see what it might take, to reach near equilibrium for s [Nontext portions of this message have been removed]


Dean S
Marj showed me a picture of the mount while it was being tested. They had the 175 and RH, and maybe even something else on it with a long shaft full of weights. Looked like it had an extension on it best I could tell. She said the mount performed perfectly loaded to the max.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
And what was cool looking was that the new scope and mount where still unfinished, bare aluminum. Perhaps she or Roland could post that picture?? Dean
Original Message
From: Joe Zeglinski Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:28 AM To: apgto@... Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Roy, Don't see where you got 110 lbs and AP1200. Granted, "old" AP1200 carried that without breaking into a sweat, with bar space to spare. But, my post was actually about the new AP1600, I was actually wondering about fitting 220 lbs. of "counterweights" on the STANDARD bar, to handle new maximum OTA load capacity on the AP1600. I just can't envisage 220 lbs made up from AP18 lb cwts, and still being able to fit on an 18.5" bar. Just as an exercise, to prove it: Using my own "Counterweights Calculator" Spreadsheet, and configuring a 220 lb (20" diameter OTA), on an AP1200 as a standin, (since I don't have dimensions for the AP1600 yet), I found that with just the standard 18.5" bar alone, there is room for just six AP18's  leaving ONLY 1/2 inch of bar to spare. Even with this fully occupied bar, the scope is still 106.33 lbs too heavy! If you want torque value, the 220 lb OTA would still be unbalanced by 1,978.74 inchlbs. So, that is why I can't see a 220 lb scope being able to use the "Standard AP1200 bar" (alone), and still using "Standard" AP counterweights. However, to prove to myself the the benefit of new AP counterweights, I reran my calculations for the fully loaded 220 lb OTA (using AP1200 dimensions as a standin)  BUT this time ... I used the AP (8.75", 6.53 lb) BAR EXTENDER, with "potentially NEW", AP 30 lb (7") & 40 lb (8") counterweights, to see what it might take, to reach near equilibrium for such a heavy max'd out OTA. Surprisingly, a 220 lb OTA would indeed balance, (with all cwts positioned at the BOTTOM of the bar), and using one of these setups: (a) 8 x AP18 lb + one AP10 lb ... Standard + EXD BAR  2.08 lbs cwtheavy, & 1.25" of empty bar remaining at the top  or  (b) 4 x AP30 lb .......................... Standard + EXD BAR  4.72 lbs cwtheavy, & 15.25" of empty bar above all weights.  or  (c) 5 x AP30 lb ........................... Standard + EXD BAR  0.26 lbs cwtheavy, & 7.25" of empty bar above all weights  BUT all cwts. moved up 5" from stop.  or  (d) 5 x AP40 lb + one AP18 lb ... Standard  NO EXD  8.85 lbs cwtheavy, & 0.5" of empty bar to spare at the top of all cwts.  no adjustment space! So, if AP were to manufacture 7" diameter (30 lb) counterweights, just for the "maximum load capacity" AP1600 situation ... then configuration (c), with five of these at middle of the (Extended) bar, would not only perfectly balance a 220 lb (20" diameter) OTA, it would also leave about a total of 12.5" of adjustment space on the bar, for accessories to be added or removed. In fact, if all 5 of these 30lb weights were positioned right at the bottom of the bar, this setup would be enough counterweight to carry & balance another 44.56 lbs of CCD camera at the back of an RC14 shaped OTA. Of course, the OTA load would then be whopping 265 lbs, but Roland's mounts seem to have "extra capacity" beyond spec. NB: In my spreadsheet, I assumed a fictitious 20" diameter 220 lb OTA, mounted on an "AP DOVELM162", for these calculations, with AP1200 "Stiction" & size dimensions, and setup for 44 deg. Latitude. But, the results are indicative of what "might" be achieved. Joe Z. Original Message From: roywellington Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 12:37 AM To: apgto@... Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Joe, Balancing 110 pounds on an AP1200 with three weights not all the way out the extender and (eyeballing) space for maybe six more weights (true most would be close in but not all) seems to be quite enough except for one of those squattish 24in RicardiHonders leviathans. This almost certainly means the next RH will be 20in only. Where do I sign up? Roy  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links


eja24601
Saw that pic, too. It also had the Maksutov in addition to the 175 and RH. Shweet! :)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Eric
 In apgto@..., "Dean S" <dean@...> wrote:


Joe Zeglinski
Thanks Fernando,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
That is good information. While looking for heavier counterweights for my RC14, I did buy a couple of those 21.7 lb Cassady's. I didn't know that Planewave has the 40's, for the same AP shaft diameter.I thought they used a different shaft size. I will check into that. Surely, there must be "uncommon nonadvertised" huge cwts for the AP3600. That should help solve the (potential) AP1600 desire of a much larger cwt on a short AP standard bar. Joe
Original Message
From: Fernando Rivera Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:12 AM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Hi, Joe FYI, if someone wishes to use heavier counterweights to fit the 1.875" ctw shaft, there are 21.7# weights from Robin Casady, & 40# weights from PlaneWave Instruments, available for purchase. Best regards Fernando Sent from my MOTOROLA ATRIX™ 2 on AT&T


The photo shows the 1600 w/ the new 175mm StarFire, 305mm RiccardiHonders and 305mm MakCas on a special plate we made for the test. The instrument weight exceeded 220 lbs. It was quite impressive! Both the mount and 175 were under test at the time and were not painted.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I will try to post the photo tomorrow. Roland and I are on the road outside Toledo, heading home. We spent a few days with his family in NY after NEAF. We will be in the office tomorrow. Marj Christen
 In apgto@..., "Dean S" <dean@...> wrote:


Joe Zeglinski
Thanks again, Fernando,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Got an email reply from PlaneWave, and just as I calculated  their #600111 APstyle 40 lb couterweight is indeed 8" outer diameter, by 3" thick, with an aluminum lock knob. That should shorten the required length of AP cwt bar for heavier OTA's  though shifting or lifting such a heavy weight can be a bit challenging. I am confident that the AP cwt bar threads are "strong enough" to hold all this counterweight, and more. I asked, but  unfortunately  PlaneWave has no plans for a 30 lb cwt. . Joe Z.
Original Message
From: Fernando Rivera Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 7:12 AM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Hi, Joe FYI, if someone wishes to use heavier counterweights to fit the 1.875" ctw shaft, there are 21.7# weights from Robin Casady, & 40# weights from "PlaneWave Instruments", available for purchase. Best regards Fernando


andy <andy@...>
Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600
Lately there has been considerable discussion regarding c/weights. For anyone interested I have the ultimate c'weight for sale. Ultimate bring that it is 6 inches long, 6 inches in diameter with a 1.510 hole thru it with 2 1/2 13 locking screws at 45 degrees from each other and weighs according to my bath room scale, 68.5 lbs. That's right 68.5 lbs. I will not discuss the construction over the networks. If you would be truly interested than call me for the particulars at 5754374233 after 10:00 AM and up till midnight, Keep in mind that shipping cost will be horrible. Again DO NOT TRY TO CONTACT ME FOR INFO THRU THE NEWSGROUPS as I will not respond to any questions posted to the news groups. Andy


Hi Joe,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
We will evaluate the need for an additional cwt suitable for the increased capacity of the 1600. Marjorie Christen
On Apr 30, 2012, at 1:31 PM, "Joe Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...<mailto:J.Zeglinski@...>> wrote:
Hi Marj, Looking at the new AP1600 picture, the RA axle section (housing) seems truncated shorter than on an AP1200, so the standard cwt bar might also sit a few inches higher up the axle, thus less leverage. In order to be able to actually mount “upto” a gargantuan 220 lb (with accessories) OTA, and in order to still have enough bar space for all its counterweights, have you considered offering an 7inch “diameter” cwt instead of limiting it to the current AP standard 6" (nominal) inch? Based on past calculations, for the same thickness, an 7” diameter cwt should give you a 30 lb weight, or an 8” diameter 40 lb cwt.  in the same space and bar hole diameter – assuming larger stainless steel bar stock is available. However, steel toe construction boots might become a safety accessory for such heavy weights The downside might be that at higher latitude setups, the larger cwt might approach the mount a bit closer, when past the meridian. Joe Z.


Christopher Erickson
Just FYI, USPS Flat Rate Priority Mail within the 50 states goes up to 70
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
pounds and "If It Fits, It Ships!" The last time I shipped 50 pounds of couterweights from Hawaii to New York, it cost me less than sixteen bucks. This is absolutely the best way to ship counterweights. International USPS Flat Rate Priority Mail is pretty amazingly cheap too, but only goes up to 20 pounds. A 17 pound counterweight could be shipped this way but probably nothing heavier. Christopher Erickson Consulting Engineer Summit Kinetics Waikoloa, HI 96738 www.summitkinetics.com
Original Message
From: apgto@... [mailto:apgto@...] On Behalf Of andy Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 9:36 AM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 Lately there has been considerable discussion regarding c/weights. For anyone interested I have the ultimate c'weight for sale. Ultimate bring that it is 6 inches long, 6 inches in diameter with a 1.510 hole thru it with 2 1/2 13 locking screws at 45 degrees from each other and weighs according to my bath room scale, 68.5 lbs. That's right 68.5 lbs. I will not discuss the construction over the networks. If you would be truly interested than call me for the particulars at 5754374233 after 10:00 AM and up till midnight, Keep in mind that shipping cost will be horrible. Again DO NOT TRY TO CONTACT ME FOR INFO THRU THE NEWSGROUPS as I will not respond to any questions posted to the news groups. Andy  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links  No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG  www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4975  Release Date: 05/03/12


divenuts
Don't forget you can get an extention cwt bar, which cost much less than the weights. If the 1600 couldn't use the 1200 weights..that would be a deal breaker for me.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Chuck/divenuts
 Original Message 
From: "Joe Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...> To: <apgto@...> Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:28 AM Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Roy,


andy <andy@...>
Subject: RE: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ?
Just FYI, USPS Flat Rate Priority Mail within the 50 states goes up to 70 pounds and "If It Fits, It Ships!" Can you imagine what would happen if one were to place a 70 lb. c'weight in a thin cardboard box? It probably wouldn't make it out of the post office.


pgwsteve
In the AP pdf file on the 1600, it states it has a 1.875" CW shaft, same as
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
the 900, 1200 and the optional Mach 1 shaft. From: apgto@... [mailto:apgto@...] On Behalf Of divenuts Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 3:47 PM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Don't forget you can get an extention cwt bar, which cost much less than the weights. If the 1600 couldn't use the 1200 weights..that would be a deal breaker for me. Chuck/divenuts
 Original Message 
From: "Joe Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@... <mailto:J.Zeglinski%40rogers.com> > To: <apgto@... <mailto:apgto%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:28 AM Subject: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Roy,


Christopher Erickson
It's called rigid foam and fiberglass tape!
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I do it all the time. Christopher Erickson Consulting Engineer Summit Kinetics Waikoloa, HI 96738 www.summitkinetics.com
Original Message
From: apgto@... [mailto:apgto@...] On Behalf Of andy Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 10:49 AM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Subject: RE: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Just FYI, USPS Flat Rate Priority Mail within the 50 states goes up to 70 pounds and "If It Fits, It Ships!" Can you imagine what would happen if one were to place a 70 lb. c'weight in a thin cardboard box? It probably wouldn't make it out of the post office.  To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the apgto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/apgtoYahoo! Groups Links  No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG  www.avg.com Version: 2012.0.1913 / Virus Database: 2425/4975  Release Date: 05/03/12


Joe Zeglinski
Hi Chuck,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
If at all possible ... it is best to AVOID using extension bars. I have been advised by an expert, that he keeps his stack of cwts as close to the upper bar as possible, and even retained his old, shorter, AP1200 cwt bar. He says that with the large mass of cwts down the bar, their "inertia" can affect the "responsiveness", of fine guiding corrections. Of course, this won't pose a problem for those at low latitudes, but those in higher latitudes may have no choice but to use extensions, since the cwt diameter can clip the mount postmeridian, especially the mount AZ Adjuster knob, which sticks out a bit further, beyond the pier perimeter. Some things to consider, before going for lighter weights further own the bar, for the same leverage. Joe Z.
Original Message
From: divenuts Sent: Thursday, May 03, 2012 4:46 PM To: apgto@... Subject: Re: [apgto] Re: Larger "diameter" Counterweights for AP1600 ? Don't forget you can get an extention cwt bar, which cost much less than the weights. If the 1600 couldn't use the 1200 weights..that would be a deal breaker for me. Chuck/divenuts

