#### PulseGuide and script

Pierre Henrotay

Thank you, Ray.
Seems that I still need to have a closer look at the "Rate inversion"
theme: I cannot figure out a rule of thumb yet, sometimes the results
are excellent and sometimes I need to invert the rates. Hit and miss.

BTW, I noticed that you added check boxes for doing this; they are
presented when the measured rates results are presnted. I would
suggest to move them to the Pulse Guider page itself. But I remember
that no further version of PG in its present form is to be expected,
or ? If you change your mind, have a think of this one...

CS,
Pierre

--- In ap-gto@..., "Ray Gralak" <rgr@...> wrote:

Hi Pierre,
So, if your plate solves returns RA/Dec then you can just subtract
the RA
values divide by time and multiply by 15. So, you should not need
for declination (Cosine of Dec) in this case.

Ray Gralak <rgr@...>

Hi Pierre,

I wrote a small (and primitive) script to derive the RA and DEC drift
rates for PG.
Basically, I take two images separated by an interval of a few
minutes, plate solve each and compute the difference in plate center,
then divide by the elapsed time. Then feed to PG.

For the RA rate, is this what PG expects or should I take into
account the DEC cosine ?
PulseGuide expects the RA/Dec rate to be in units of arc-sec/sec. e.g. A
value 1.00 would move Dec axis 1 arc-sec per second, and the RA axis 1/15
arc-sec seconds per second (since RA is measured in 24H format instead of
degrees).

So, if your plate solves returns RA/Dec then you can just subtract the RA
values divide by time and multiply by 15. So, you should not need to adjust
for declination (Cosine of Dec) in this case.

And second question: I understand that one possible usage of PG is
to compensate for (some amount of) polar misalignment
- such as the difference between true and refracted pole.

Am I pushing it too far if I also apply it for a misalignement of
several minutes (say 10). Of course, I understand that
there can be many factors (exposure time, declination, latitude...).
So there might be no simple answer.
The possible rate changes are rather complex to calculate and dependent on
which direction the polar misalignment is directed. As you expected there is
no easy formula to go by. You can measure the rate and null polar
misalignment for a good interval of time, maybe as much as 30-40 minutes
before re-measuring. The problem is possible field rotation, which is not
corrected for even by a rate change.

-Ray

Pierre Henrotay

Hi all,

This one for Ray I think.

I wrote a small (and primitive) script to derive the RA and DEC drift
rates for PG.
Basically, I take two images separated by an interval of a few
minutes, plate solve each and compute the difference in plate center,
then divide by the elapsed time. Then feed to PG.

For the RA rate, is this what PG expects or should I take into
account the DEC cosine ?

And second question: I understand that one possible usage of PG is
to compensate for (some amount of) polar misalignment
- such as the difference between true and refracted pole.

Am I pushing it too far if I also apply it for a misalignement of
several minutes (say 10). Of course, I understand that
there can be many factors (exposure time, declination, latitude...).
So there might be no simple answer.

Regards,
Pierre

 1 - 3 of 3