A quick question... I operate an 1100GTO and years ago purchased APCC Pro, though I currently do not have it installed. I may very well decide to install it in the future for that mount on a new compu

#APCC

Thank you for pointing me in the right direction. I had to change the graphics setting and now things are working well. Regards, David

#APCC

Hi David, That is a pretty unusual error that probably has nothing to do with APCC specifically, but something needed to present 3D graphics. It might be something related to your graphics card driver

#APCC

Everything is working very well with my new Mach2GTO and APCC Pro except for the 3D View feature. When I click on the 3D View button I get a pop-up that states, "Load Library failed with error 1114. A

#APCC

Hi Andrea In my experience APPM does not work that way at all, but it's much easier. You define a set of points in the sky, run the model, sit back and it finishes. You only get one shot at the model

#APCC

Hello, I am going to use APPM, and I have experience with tpoint. In Tpoint you can define a set of points close together to quickly start with the corrections and then continue on more distant points

#APCC

I have been using v6.5SP1 (RC1) with no issues thus far although I am still using a 197 point APPM model from a couple of weeks ago which was created with 6.4 installed.

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Some clarification: 1) ASCOM Platform v6.4SP1 is okay to still use. 2) ASCOM Platform v6.5 had a serious bug in the Transform class that would cause APPM to produce bad models. 3) You can now *optiona

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Ray had noted that we should use v6.5SP1 but Karen’s email references v6.4SP1. Should we not use any version of 6.5 at this time?

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

I’ve also un-pinned this thread from the top of the Messages list on the ap-gto Groups.io group. That was probably misleading, as well. Karen AP

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

The website is now updated. Thank you for this discussion. Clear Skies, Marj Christen Astro-Physics, Inc 11250 Forest Hills Rd Machesney Park, IL 61115 Phone: 815-282-1513 Fax: 815-282-9847 www.astro-

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

I think Ray pointed us to the ASCOM Initiative site, which lists v6.5 SP1 and has this information: <https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Platform/html/FC49CB34-01CF-4D01-BE66-6D55796512D5.htm> Maybe the

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Below is what is currently shown on the AP website (my goto when determining what version of ASCOM Platform to use): ASCOM V2 Driver & Platform ASCOM V2 Driver current version ASCOM V6.4SP1 Platform f

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

I agree, it is confusing, but technically it is correct. You do not want to use ASCOM Platform 6.5, but you do want ASCOM Platform 6.5SP1, which is now available on the ASCOM website. I must have eith

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Is this thread now obsolete? If so, then the title is confusing/misleading.

#APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

The documentation Field_CP4_Download-browser.pdf doesn't mention what to do with the .wif file so mentioning that would be a good idea in the documentation review.

#APCC

Although I wouldn't recommend it, our first setup polar alignment was several *hundred* arcmin off and APCC was still able to correct it reasonably well.

#Mach2GTO #APCC

That's amazing. Thanks Roland

#Mach2GTO #APCC

You could be worse than that and APPM will correct it nicely. Rolando

#Mach2GTO #APCC

Let's assume somewhere between 1 and 2 arc-min of error. Will APPM correct that or does it need to be tighter?

#Mach2GTO #APCC