Hi, as we had some discussions around the new Sony Cmos and Moravian cameras, I am attaching my first image using the combo Mach2 and Moravian C3. After a number of issues and under a poor sky , I've

Wow, a telescope like the CDK20 can have a baffling issue? I can understand the problem in lesser telescope but in the PW CDK is very strange, no? you should propose them your retrofit kit :-) Andrea

Very well done, congratulations.

In my old observatory I built an aluminum wall around the pier, 60 cm height. It was actually a defense line wide enough to include the rack with electronics. The walls were flat to avoid the mice cli

Hi, I have a thread open for something similar, also happened with 1.9.0.5 and mach2. I have attached the link to my stars closeup there. I am not saying the two cases have something in common, also b

Linwood, thank you. I agree on skyx vs NINA. I run for years a PME with skyx and CCDAP so my first instinct has been to just continue. I was studying NINA in the background, yesterday I had to step to

Hi Ray, Please try this link: https://www.dropbox.com/s/rpf86i55bezwznw/ApccZip-andrea_lucchetti-2021-09-12-182543.zip?dl=0 I am not saying APPC and skyx are not compatible, only that I had troubles.

Thanks Linwood, very helpful. Yesterday I was in hurry and very lucky to understand the basics for saving the night, the calibration happened almost by chance as I couldn't find a calibrate button :-)

hi Ray, I sent you the logs in the other thread. The tracking issue started before the modeling. I don't use skyx as planetarium only, but I use skyx camera add on for about everything: -I connect CCD

Hi Ray, thank you I am attaching the zip but I see a number of files. I see it is a big file, please let me know how to send it if attachment doesn't work. Yesterday I had a " panic moment" and starte

Hello, I had to quickly move to NINA because my skyx doesn't cooperate well with APCC Pro after 1.9. I almost used the standard setting in PHD2 and saved the night but guiding was bad. I noticed the c

Hello, second post this morning thanks to the good night. I have APCC PRO 1.9.0.5 and Mach2. When slewing or closed looping in skyx the tracking rate increase to a point that a 2 second frame is trail

Hi, can someone remind me the files needed to "share" the model? I'd like to ask for help here. I've run a small model (20 points in two dec arcs. There are some large value in the est , but the value

I've just received my Moravian C3 61000 pro.IMX455 It is very well built, as the previous 16803 I used to own. download speed is fantastic. I kept my 50x50 filters I hope to try it soon...

The behavior seems the same I reported last year with my Mach2. Will try to go back to see the details if helpful

Linwood, Can you remind me your mount type? About one year ago I saw something similar in Skyx but I thought was because the mount was new ( Mach 2). After that I learned to use the move commands in a

0ne thing I can suggest if you didn’t check already: - take a series of short frames, with some delay in between, to cover 30 min or more - do the Sum or create an animation of the series’ and check i

#APCC

Thank you Dale, I am going to try Nina soon and this is good info. One thing I don’t get, I wonder what could be the difference using plate solve images that are 4 seconds and binning 2x2. If the diff

On Fri, 20 Aug 2021 at 22:17, Rouz <rbidshahri@...> wrote: Ray, Ah, so I shouldn't use "hour angle", I can try that. I tried pointing corrections on and Dec Arc off, seemed better. It looked lik

what a dream ... fantastic you don't need much equipment , I wish I'll have the chance to get there one time. Andrea