Date   

Re: Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

Ray Gralak
 

Hi Eric,

The right side of this is with guiding OFF. I believe it shows polar alignment isn't perfect, but it's pretty close. Note
the scale is +/- 4px.
According to the pointing model, the mount's polar alignment is over 10 arc-minutes off in elevation and over 20 arc-minutes off in azimuth. Since you say that the polar alignment is now good, it might be that polar alignment shifted or was manually adjusted afterward, which would cause drift when tracking correction is enabled. I think you should improve polar alignment and then redo the model in either case.

Also, for a refractor, the pointing model's RMS is high. It should be closer to 10 arc-seconds for East and West. You might want to check that all fittings are tight and cables are not interfering or tight, which can cause random or unmodeled errors. Lastly, enable Dec Arc Tracking if your license allows for that. This will usually produce better tracking accuracy than the full-sky model does because it accounts for pointing errors outside of the full-sky model's pointing terms.

-Ray


Re: Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

Roland Christen
 

1) are you sure that you were guiding when you took the image?
2) If you did a model but the scope drifted in RA and Dec it appears that you did not activate the model
3) What is your guiding setup? Off-axis or separate guide scope?
4) We may want you to run a simple test on the CP4 to see what software version and internal settings are. Will check with you tomorrow during office hours.

Rolando

-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Claeys <AstroEric@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Sun, Apr 24, 2022 5:58 am
Subject: [ap-gto] Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

I have a TEC 140 refractor on a 1100GTO with encoders on a permanent pier.  I ran a 378 point model, and am getting excellent guiding with SGP and PHD2; mostly +/-  0.25 pixels, but getting very oval stars.  I'm not sure how that can happen, and don't know how to fix it.

Full-size pictures and additional information, including full setup, is at https://eccssw.com/AstroIssues/OvalStars/.

Here's the model results.  I have no idea if this is "good" or not.


Here's guiding with tracking corrections On, then Off.  Even when Off I'm getting pretty good guiding.  Note the scale is +/- 1px.

The right side of this is with guiding OFF.  I believe it shows polar alignment isn't perfect, but it's pretty close.  Note the scale is +/- 4px.

And hear are the oval stars:

How can I be getting very oval stars with extremely good guiding and pretty good polar alignment?

This just started happening recently.

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

 

Hi Eric

I can offer a few observations:

On your model, you may have a few errant points (max error on east is 174 which seems high to me)
I suggest you enable these two options
image.png

Second, enabling/disabling your guiding should not be that dramatic, especially for an encoder mount.  your comment "although checking later showed azimuth off by about 15 minutes and altitude about 1 minute." sounds to me like something may have slipped or settled? maybe time to check things over and do another polar alignment

Finally, anytime I hear "great guiding, but oblong stars" my first reaction is differential flexure. Not sure what is your guiding setup, but if you are guiding on a separate scope, that is definitely a suspect

Brian


On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 3:58 AM Eric Claeys <AstroEric@...> wrote:
I have a TEC 140 refractor on a 1100GTO with encoders on a permanent pier.  I ran a 378 point model, and am getting excellent guiding with SGP and PHD2; mostly +/-  0.25 pixels, but getting very oval stars.  I'm not sure how that can happen, and don't know how to fix it.

Full-size pictures and additional information, including full setup, is at https://eccssw.com/AstroIssues/OvalStars/.

Here's the model results.  I have no idea if this is "good" or not.


Here's guiding with tracking corrections On, then Off.  Even when Off I'm getting pretty good guiding.  Note the scale is +/- 1px.

The right side of this is with guiding OFF.  I believe it shows polar alignment isn't perfect, but it's pretty close.  Note the scale is +/- 4px.

And hear are the oval stars:

How can I be getting very oval stars with extremely good guiding and pretty good polar alignment?

This just started happening recently.



--
Brian 



Brian Valente


Re: Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

Jeff B
 

What Mike says but when I look closely at some of the dimmer stars, they look like very tight double stars to me.

Odd.

Keep us posted.

Jeff

On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 8:47 AM M Hambrick <mhambrick563@...> wrote:
Are you seeing the oval stars across the whole image ? If so, it could be that your imaging train is tilted ? If you are only seeing the oval stars in the corners you may have some field curvature.

Mike


Re: APCC - APPM and NINA

Jack Huerkamp
 

Last night, it was cloudy. So, I set up APPM and connected it to my AP1600 mount.  For the camera option, I selected NASA SkyView so I could see how the procedure works.  It took about 25 minutes for the mount to go to the 36 points.  

Since I am in a manual domed observatory, I will select the "Pause after each Slew" option to ensure that the scope is aimed through the shutter opening before capturing an image.

But for doing my first APPM run, should I choose "Plate Solve" or "Plate Solve and Recal" for acquiring the data for my mount/scope configuration?

Also, I do not own third party applications like Maxim DL, CCDSoft, SGP, etc. and will be using the "NINA camera" option my cameras have native NINA drivers.  In using the "NINA Camera" option, does APPM control the camera thru NINA, take the exposures and call up ASTAP to do the plate solving.

Finally after APPM has run its course and gone to all the points in the APPM routine, does it prompt you to save the acquired data and use it to create a model?  I did not see that occur after running a 36 point APPM yesterday using NASA SkyView option.

Jack Huerkamp


Re: New Videos on the AP YouTube Channel

M Hambrick
 

Thanks Karen. More great videos.

I will throw another one into the suggestion list. How about a video demonstrating how to set up meridian delays with APCC and the Keypad. Maybe this would be better as two separate videos. The idea would be to demonstrate how to set the delays up in the software and to show how the mount behaves once they are set up.

Mike


Re: Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

M Hambrick
 

Are you seeing the oval stars across the whole image ? If so, it could be that your imaging train is tilted ? If you are only seeing the oval stars in the corners you may have some field curvature.

Mike


Very oval stars with excellent guiding - how?

Eric Claeys
 
Edited

I have a TEC 140 refractor on a 1100GTO with encoders on a permanent pier.  I ran a 378 point model, and am getting excellent guiding with SGP and PHD2; mostly +/-  0.25 pixels, but getting very oval stars.  I'm not sure how that can happen, and don't know how to fix it.

Full-size pictures and additional information, including full setup, is at https://eccssw.com/AstroIssues/OvalStars/.

Here's the model results.  I have no idea if this is "good" or not.


Here's guiding with tracking corrections On, then Off.  Even when Off I'm getting pretty good guiding.  Note the scale is +/- 1px.

The right side of this is with guiding OFF.  I believe it shows polar alignment isn't perfect, but it's pretty close.  Note the scale is +/- 4px.

And hear are the oval stars:

How can I be getting very oval stars with extremely good guiding and pretty good polar alignment?

This just started happening recently.


Re: DOVELM162 on Mach2

Jeffc
 

RTFM of course...



On Apr 23, 2022, at 7:13 PM, Jeffc via groups.io <jeffcrilly@...> wrote:

I’ve been swapping saddles around and installing a DOVELM162 on the Mach2 today.

Of course, finding the correct bolts is a bit of a challenge.


Shows:

      1/4-20 x 1" SHCS [for mounting to 900, 1100, 1200, 1600 or Mach1 (M1 uses 4),


Does the Mach2 have the same DEC saddle threads as the Mach1?

I used 1/4-20 x 1”, but they did “look” a bit long.   That said, I don’t feel any play and the DOVELM162 looks seated well.

Just wanted to double check.   

<PastedGraphic-2.png>


Ps.  The faster chart could use an update.

-Jeff






DOVELM162 on Mach2

Jeffc
 

I’ve been swapping saddles around and installing a DOVELM162 on the Mach2 today.

Of course, finding the correct bolts is a bit of a challenge.


Shows:

      1/4-20 x 1" SHCS [for mounting to 900, 1100, 1200, 1600 or Mach1 (M1 uses 4),


Does the Mach2 have the same DEC saddle threads as the Mach1?

I used 1/4-20 x 1”, but they did “look” a bit long.   That said, I don’t feel any play and the DOVELM162 looks seated well.

Just wanted to double check.   



Ps.  The faster chart could use an update.

-Jeff





Re: Setting a Fixed DHCP Lease to a Mach1

Jerome A Yesavage
 

I think I got it.  My router would not allow me to assign the same number as already being used by the mount... had a lease already.  So I made a fixed lease for another UNUSED number, then assigned that in APCC, and it connects.... on and off a couple times....


Re: AP1100 Play in Dec Axis #Guiding

Roland Christen
 

Little Moose ok, BIG Moose, no! Smile

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: Harley Davidson <astrocnc@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Sat, Apr 23, 2022 2:42 pm
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100 Play in Dec Axis #Guiding

Roland

Would a "little MOOSE" be okay to use (as shown below) to tighten those screws :)

tony


On 4/21/2022 11:54 AM, Roland Christen via groups.io wrote:

Can I have overtightened the 8x bearing bolts?
You problem appears to have been loose clutches.
Overtightening the 8 screws is not an issue unless you used an 8ft cheater wrench with a Moose pushing on the end.

Rolando

-----Original Message-----
From: Rouz <rbidshahri@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Thu, Apr 21, 2022 10:17 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100 Play in Dec Axis #Guiding

I tightened the 8 Dec and Ra bolts. they were pretty tight to begin with.
  •  
  • I then tightened the clutch knobs all the way down with an Allen key.
  •  
  • The gap on the dec axis no longer opened up and the Dec' plate was parallel  to the axis which is good news.
  •  
  • However, making a model (same points as before) showed the error to much worse.

I did change the camera configuration so the balance was off:

  1. I'm not sure if the balance being off caused such a larger error? (will rebalance and try again)
  2. Can I have overtightened the 8x bearing bolts?



--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: New Videos on the AP YouTube Channel

Harley Davidson
 

Excellent videos Karen. You make the ones I do look 3rd rate :)

Is it possible to do a video showing (with a mount) how to do a complete daytime alignment of the mount? It would be much appreciated. Maybe get Roland in the video while he takes a break from making lenses.

thanks   tony

On 4/22/2022 4:35 PM, Karen Christen wrote:

Happy Friday Astronuts!

Just a quick announcement to let you know there are 2 new videos on the AP YouTube channel.  Per your request, we’re working hard to provide more instructional videos on a wide range of topics.  The latest editions cover:

  • Setting East Limits for Both Pier Sides in APCC: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAOo87tDngA
    • Review this video to learn how to utilize APCC to start imaging in a counterweight-up position so you can image through the meridian and avoid a meridian flip.
  • How to Adjust the Backstop on Self-Adjusting Gearboxes: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rGAxog2xTf4
    • This is rarely needed but since we produced the video for a customer we thought we’d make it available to everyone. 

We suggest Subscribing to the channel to be informed of new videos and changes in real time.  We hope you find these helpful.  And a quick shoutout to our team members who are making these videos possible – Dave, Paige, Ray, and Brian! 

Clear skies!

Karen & the Astro-Folks

 


--
Karen Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: AP1100 Play in Dec Axis #Guiding

Harley Davidson
 

Roland

Would a "little MOOSE" be okay to use (as shown below) to tighten those screws :)

tony


On 4/21/2022 11:54 AM, Roland Christen via groups.io wrote:


Can I have overtightened the 8x bearing bolts?
You problem appears to have been loose clutches.
Overtightening the 8 screws is not an issue unless you used an 8ft cheater wrench with a Moose pushing on the end.

Rolando

-----Original Message-----
From: Rouz <rbidshahri@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Thu, Apr 21, 2022 10:17 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP1100 Play in Dec Axis #Guiding

I tightened the 8 Dec and Ra bolts. they were pretty tight to begin with.
  •  
  • I then tightened the clutch knobs all the way down with an Allen key.
  •  
  • The gap on the dec axis no longer opened up and the Dec' plate was parallel  to the axis which is good news.
  •  
  • However, making a model (same points as before) showed the error to much worse.

I did change the camera configuration so the balance was off:

  1. I'm not sure if the balance being off caused such a larger error? (will rebalance and try again)
  2. Can I have overtightened the 8x bearing bolts?



--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: Windows 11

Patrick Sparkman
 

Everything has worked fine for me so far.  I did the upgrade from from 10 to 11 using the Software Update in Windows.


Re: Setting a Fixed DHCP Lease to a Mach1

Ray Gralak
 

Hi Jerry,

I set it on my router with the right MAC address but almost at random the Mach1 wants another IP address so if it is
set to 192.168.0.88 that may work for a while, but then it goes to 192.168.0.89 and I have to modify the connection.

Am I missing something in APCC?
APCC does not control the IP address settings of your mount. The best way is to log back into your router and make sure it is assigning a *static* IP address to the mount.

-Ray


Re: Setting a Fixed DHCP Lease to a Mach1

Christopher Erickson
 

The CP4 has wired and wireless Internet ports and each has its own unique MAC address and each will get it's own DHCP IP assignment.

I hope that helps.

"Always take the high road. There's less traffic."

-Christopher Erickson
Observatory Engineer
Summit Kinetics
Waikoloa, Hawaii


Virus-free. www.avg.com


On Sat, Apr 23, 2022 at 7:58 AM Jerome A Yesavage <yesavage@...> wrote:
Hi,

Am using APCC latest version and for the life of me cannot get the system to accept a fixed DHCP lease for its TCP connection. 

I set it on my router with the right MAC address but almost at random the Mach1 wants another IP address so if it is set to 192.168.0.88 that may work for a while, but then it goes to 192.168.0.89 and I have to modify the connection.

Am I missing something in APCC?

Jerry Y


Setting a Fixed DHCP Lease to a Mach1

Jerome A Yesavage
 

Hi,

Am using APCC latest version and for the life of me cannot get the system to accept a fixed DHCP lease for its TCP connection. 

I set it on my router with the right MAC address but almost at random the Mach1 wants another IP address so if it is set to 192.168.0.88 that may work for a while, but then it goes to 192.168.0.89 and I have to modify the connection.

Am I missing something in APCC?

Jerry Y


Re: Windows 11

Pete Tuson
 

I bought a mini pc which came preinstalled with Win 11. I had no intention of trying it prior to that, but absolutely everything astro related works with no issues whatsoever.

I can see no advantage to Win 11 over 10 but it's not a disaster if you have it. 

On Sat, 23 Apr 2022, 00:19 midmoastro, <teche70@...> wrote:
I will echo Brian, no issues here running Win11. (NINA, SharpCap, APCC, ASCOM, etc.)
Todd


Re: Forgot to Park last night

Roland Christen
 

Loosen the clutches, send it to Park3, let it go where it wants. Then move it manually to Park3. That's it.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: michael mccann via groups.io <mmccawsprojects@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Fri, Apr 22, 2022 8:20 pm
Subject: [ap-gto] Forgot to Park last night

Darn, I forgot to park my AP900 last night. Started at pointing to zenith to do flats .  So what actually happens to the clutches when it goes a few hours pushing scope against pier for a few hours?  I suspect if I set the clutch at the right tension there’s probably no damage.  Also, what’s the best way to recover? Do I try parking at CWD, or best to recal ? (I’m using N.I.N.A.)

Thanks ahead

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics