Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Wiggins, Rick
Hi Joe,
Thanks. That is similar, but the design that I was describing only covers the mount and is much smaller...just big enough to surround the mount. Thanks, Rick --- In ap-gto@..., "Joseph Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...> wrote: pics and plans:wish I ofhad a link to them, but will attempt a brief description. hasthe pier and just big enough to cover the mount. The box comes in thea round cutout in the bottom to fit around the pier and spring topmount and around the pier to form the bottom of a box and then a Evenhat box that fits over the mount and clamps to the bottom. better, cover the mount first in a nice warm, breathable, non-
|
|
Re: Mach1GTO Cable Routing
Hello Bruce,
There is no right or wrong way to run the cables inside the Mach1GTO. Do whatever works best for you with your equipment and situation. I have rather large hands and fat fingers, so removing the Polar Scope Adapter makes the process a bit easier for me. My preference for the RA Axis Cover instead of the Polar Scope Hole is because I use a polar scope to get my alignment close every time I set up. I carry the mount out of my garage on its tripod with the cables attached and the polar scope already in place. I set the wood tripod feet on the "cheater" marks that I made on the driveway, and I'm usually within a minor tweak or two of adequate alignment for accurate GoTo's. The section on through-the-mount cabling in the manual was intended as a guide with some suggestions. Don't take it as a rule book! Mag. 7 skies! Howard Hedlund Astro-Physics, Inc. 815-282-1513 ________________________________ From: ap-gto@... [mailto:ap-gto@...] On Behalf Of reddbarron2000 Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 8:17 PM To: ap-gto@... Subject: [ap-gto] Mach1GTO Cable Routing 1. When running cables through the mount, is that any reason to remove the polar scope adapter rather than feeding the cables through the polar scope hole? 2. The manual recommends feeding the Y-cable out the RA Access Hole and running the control box end of the cable externally. Is there a reason not to feed the control box end of the Y-cable out the polar scope hole and just have the RA end of the cable go out through the RA Access Hole? The would permit better harnessing of all of the cables coming out of the mount. Bruce
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Roland Christen
In a message dated 4/8/2008 1:07:41 PM Central Daylight Time,
msfainc@... writes: Money saved from building a remote observatory should buy me a Prius...Save for a Chevy Volt ;^) Rolando ************** Planning your summer road trip? Check out AOL Travel Guides. (http://travel.aol.com/travel-guide/united-states?ncid=aoltrv00030000000016)
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
elraeburn
My State Farm agent told me several years ago to photograph any
"unusual" items. Replacing a TV is easy for them to do; replacing an AP refractor is not. They don't generally deal with such gems, so the more information you can provide in case of a loss, the easier it will be should you need to file a claim. I keep detailed photos of my astronomical and musical equipment locked in a drawer at work, where they won't be damaged in a catastrophic loss at home. As a possibly-useful aside, it is more difficult to document the value of a vintage saxophone than a pristine AP scope, so I periodically get my musical instruments reappraised by a qualified repair person. -Eric --- In ap-gto@..., "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> wrote: insure mounts, telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover itand I would want full replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would beappreciated. Thank You
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Dean S
I just spoke with my home owners insurance this morning, State Farm, and she
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
said my observatory contents are included with the content coverage of my house. Cameras, telescopes, computers, etc. And as long as it is just a hobby there is no additional coverage needed, assuming it is enough overall. However to be safe I am looking into adding this as an addition to be absolutely sure there would be no hidden exclusions. Dean www.doghouseastronomy.com
----- Original Message -----
From: "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:10 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment Hello,mounts, telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover it and Iwould want full replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would be appreciated.Thank You
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Dale Ghent
On Apr 7, 2008, at 9:45 PM, Joseph Zeglinski wrote:
Sounds great,Having lived in Tiger Mosquito-infested (which is in turn West Nile Virus-infested) Baltimore, MD... the big thing to do with mosquitoes is to eliminate any areas of standing water - from bird baths to catch basins under potted plants and clogged rain gutters - and inform the neighbors of the benefits of them doing the same. If you have a garden pond, stock it with Koi fish as the find mosquito larvae quite the snack. As for natural repellant, lemon grass does the job well and smells good, to boot. Grows much faster than a cedar tree and is a good landscaping grass in most north american climes... well, the ones where mosquitoes tend to be a real nuisance anyway. I'm trying to figure out how to work something AP-GTO into here to keep it at least semi-on topic but I'm failing ;) /dale
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Bill Bradford
Rick makes a good point about agents and underwriters. If you are dealing with a particular agent and cannot get the coverage you want, you need to try other agents that have better knowledge of underwriters that will cover your items or that are willing to simply work harder at finding an underwriter that will cover your items.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I use a State Farm agent that works hard to find the appropriate coverage. I had to change companies to get the coverage I wanted. Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Rick Wiggins To: ap-gto@... Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 4:03 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment Hi, I will post the short version here. Please be aware that the "Insurance Company" is rarely the company that actully writes the policy and provides the protection. This and the following explains the variation in coverage etc. 1. The consumer buys coverage from an individual or company. 2. The selling agent that we (the consumer) deal with may work for a large insurance company (i.e. State Farm), a small company, or be totally a one person operation. 3. The actual insurance policy is provided by an underwriter (the actual insuring agency) and this is usually tranparent to the consumer. This underwriter could be the large insurance company itself or any one of hundreds of underwriters all over the world. 4. It is common for agents and companies to deal with multiple underwriters to get the most appropriate and best deal for each individual policy. 5. There are state and possibly other governing bodies that legislate some restrictions in some areas. This means that "State Farm is not State Farm" and you milage may vary. The best advice is to check your policy, call around, and read any policy very carefully. If you don't understand it, get a friend (preferably an agent or broker) to help you understand the policy. Getting insurance on observatories is difficult...more difficult of off your residential property...and far more difficult if it is on someone else's property. I would be seriously concerned if your homeowner's policy did not cover a modest amount of astronomy equipment (personal property kept at home or traveling with you). If they don;'t cover this, what else don't they cover? I am not an agent and I am still looking for a good observatory policy, but this is my current understanding. Thanks, Rick --- In ap-gto@..., "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> wrote: > > Hello, > Does anyone have the name of a good insurance company that will insure mounts, > telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover it and I would want full > replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You >
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Joe Zeglinski
Sounds great,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
What kind of hedge are you selecting - that will not harbour mosquitoes, etc.? Do cedar trees discourage mosquitoes? Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Morgan Spangle" <msfainc@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 9:36 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors I had thought about this. But since I also need to screen the local
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Bill Bradford
That's a great idea, Stuart. I am going to start a similar spreadsheet.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I have to provide sales invoices to put items on the policy but I need to keep up with changing values. Bill BTW, if I buy something on AM, they just need to see a photo of the item and some documentation on its market value.
----- Original Message -----
From: S HEGGIE To: ap-gto@... Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:35 PM Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment Something else I do is maintain a spreadsheet of serial #'s and market pricing for all items. I give this to my insurance company anytime something major changes. I don't want to get into a debate on the insured value of something that gets stolen. Also, I found out that when you say "camera" or "bicycle" they assume it is cheap - some items over a particular value (bicycle over $1000 for example) they want to see a copy of the receipt. Stuart >From: "Dean S" <dean@...> >Reply-To: ap-gto@... >To: <ap-gto@...> >Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment >Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2008 00:30:18 -0400 > >I just spoke with my home owners insurance this morning, State Farm, and >she >said my observatory contents are included with the content coverage of my >house. Cameras, telescopes, computers, etc. > >And as long as it is just a hobby there is no additional coverage needed, >assuming it is enough overall. However to be safe I am looking into adding >this as an addition to be absolutely sure there would be no hidden >exclusions. > >Dean >www.doghouseastronomy.com > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> >To: <ap-gto@...> >Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:10 PM >Subject: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment > > > > Hello, > > Does anyone have the name of a good insurance company that will >insure >mounts, > > telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover it and I >would want full > > replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would be appreciated. >Thank You > > > > > > ------------------------------------ > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the ap-gto list > > see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ap-gtoYahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > > >
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Morgan Spangle <msfainc@...>
I had thought about this. But since I also need to screen the local
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
house and street lights, I'm thinking about a "secret garden" - a space enclosed by a hedge of 6' tall arborvitae, accessed by a gate in one of the hedge walls. This would provide shelter from wind and light; security; temperature equilibrium for scope and mount; and allow me to place it on the best spot on my property - without the neighborhood watch group getting upset! Even the wife has given the thumbs up...so I'll keep you all posted as I go ahead. Morgan
--- In ap-gto@..., "tucstargzr" <tucstargzr@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Bill Bradford
As I posted earlier, I also have State Farm but have a Personal Articles policy that includes not only the astronomy equipment but other high value items.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I wonder if they are putting yours under your homeowner's policy because the observatory is a structure on your property. I don't have an observatory and travel to dark sites, so I wanted something to cover my equipment anywhere it happens to be. My coverage is for replacement value and the rate is quite reasonable. Of course, I'm in Texas and we have some weird insurance regulations in this state :>), so my circumstance may not apply to those in other states. Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: Dean S To: ap-gto@... Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:30 PM Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment I just spoke with my home owners insurance this morning, State Farm, and she said my observatory contents are included with the content coverage of my house. Cameras, telescopes, computers, etc. And as long as it is just a hobby there is no additional coverage needed, assuming it is enough overall. However to be safe I am looking into adding this as an addition to be absolutely sure there would be no hidden exclusions. Dean www.doghouseastronomy.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 12:10 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment > Hello, > Does anyone have the name of a good insurance company that will insure mounts, > telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover it and I would want full > replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You > > > ------------------------------------ > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the ap-gto list > see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ap-gtoYahoo! Groups Links > > > >
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Morgan Spangle <msfainc@...>
Hi Mark,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I like the suggestion about removing the electronics to a garage or unheated building - I could do that easily. Thanks for all the tips... Morgan
--- In ap-gto@..., "Mark Clegg" <Mark63clegg@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Bill Bradford
I have State Farm and they cover my equipment as a Personal Articles policy. We also have auto and homeowners with them. Don't know if they would cover the equipment if I did not have the other policies.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Bill
----- Original Message -----
From: mizzou156 To: ap-gto@... Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 11:10 AM Subject: [ap-gto] Insurance for astronomy equipment Hello, Does anyone have the name of a good insurance company that will insure mounts, telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover it and I would want full replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would be appreciated. Thank You
|
|
Mach1GTO Cable Routing
reddbarron2000 <bbarron1@...>
1. When running cables through the mount, is that any reason to remove
the polar scope adapter rather than feeding the cables through the polar scope hole? 2. The manual recommends feeding the Y-cable out the RA Access Hole and running the control box end of the cable externally. Is there a reason not to feed the control box end of the Y-cable out the polar scope hole and just have the RA end of the cable go out through the RA Access Hole? The would permit better harnessing of all of the cables coming out of the mount. Bruce
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Dean S
I told her that and she said I should go ahead and give her some of the invoices of the more expensive items, and then she would give me a quote for them seperately as well.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
----- Original Message -----
From: "ancient.sull" <ancient.sull@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 7:14 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment --- In ap-gto@..., "Dean S" <dean@...> wrote:and she
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
ancient.sull
--- In ap-gto@..., "Dean S" <dean@...> wrote:
and she said my observatory contents are included with the content coverageof my house. Cameras, telescopes, computers, etc.I too insure with State Farm and probably everyone's policy is a little different, but did you tell your agent a ball park dollar value for the equipment? Your agent may be thinking, "Oh, a camera or similar. Maybe $500" not "$30,000 to $50,000 of mounts, cameras, computers, filters, etc." Mine is insured but with a separate rider and an added premium based on the total value. Drew Sullivan
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Joe Zeglinski
Hi Rick,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Here is a link to the Hanna City Remote Robotic Observatory, pics and plans: I think that is what you were referring to as a BOX observatory. http://www.mtco.com/~jgunn/ Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rick Wiggins" <rickwiggins@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 4:34 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors Hi Morgan,
|
|
Re: Insurance for astronomy equipment
Wiggins, Rick
Hi,
I will post the short version here. Please be aware that the "Insurance Company" is rarely the company that actully writes the policy and provides the protection. This and the following explains the variation in coverage etc. 1. The consumer buys coverage from an individual or company. 2. The selling agent that we (the consumer) deal with may work for a large insurance company (i.e. State Farm), a small company, or be totally a one person operation. 3. The actual insurance policy is provided by an underwriter (the actual insuring agency) and this is usually tranparent to the consumer. This underwriter could be the large insurance company itself or any one of hundreds of underwriters all over the world. 4. It is common for agents and companies to deal with multiple underwriters to get the most appropriate and best deal for each individual policy. 5. There are state and possibly other governing bodies that legislate some restrictions in some areas. This means that "State Farm is not State Farm" and you milage may vary. The best advice is to check your policy, call around, and read any policy very carefully. If you don't understand it, get a friend (preferably an agent or broker) to help you understand the policy. Getting insurance on observatories is difficult...more difficult of off your residential property...and far more difficult if it is on someone else's property. I would be seriously concerned if your homeowner's policy did not cover a modest amount of astronomy equipment (personal property kept at home or traveling with you). If they don;'t cover this, what else don't they cover? I am not an agent and I am still looking for a good observatory policy, but this is my current understanding. Thanks, Rick --- In ap-gto@..., "mizzou156" <mizzou156@...> wrote: insure mounts, telescopes, ccd cameras, ect. Homeowners insurance won't cover itand I would want full replacement cost, should a loss occur. Any help would beappreciated. Thank You
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
Wiggins, Rick
Hi Morgan,
Have you seen the little boxes that some people have made? I wish I had a link to them, but will attempt a brief description. Imagine the closed position of a wooden box around just the top of the pier and just big enough to cover the mount. The box comes in two pieces that fit together with overlapping weather seals. It has a round cutout in the bottom to fit around the pier and spring loaded closer hasps to seal it tight when closed. Another version has two flat pieces that fit together just below the mount and around the pier to form the bottom of a box and then a top hat box that fits over the mount and clamps to the bottom. Top off the design with a 15 watt light bulb and some bottom vent holes to allow minimum air flow and I think you have a winner. Even better, cover the mount first in a nice warm, breathable, non- hygroscopic blanket (i.e. Gore-tex fabric) first, then cover it. Just another idea. Thanks, Rick --- In ap-gto@..., "Morgan Spangle" <msfainc@...> wrote: So my choice is to leave the mount out in an area of the garden nextto the driveway that I will wall off from view with a dense hedge.I'll drop some footings in for the tripod feet (I use a Meade giantfield tripod, very solid) and plant some kind of ground cover I can walkon or grass. Run electric to it from the garage, make a path for adolly to bring the computer and other equipment out (maybe even the OTA,not sure whether I'll load it each time or leave it mounted and coveredsetup/breakdown, like you've done the the Out Haus.did goodyoucome up with? I have a C14 on mine so it would take a pretty highsized barrel or drum... intowindsand something flying in the air hit the OTA putting a dent thatit. flyingeventhese newer padded bags would still sustain damage from a object.
|
|
Re: Atmospheric Refraction, Tracking Accuracy and PulseGuide
Wiggins, Rick
Hi Ray,
I don't want to start a e-mail flame here, but would like to pose a theory (currently my belief based on years of separate guider use). I believe that there are several possibilities for flexure. One is that the configuration (permanent setup that is fixed and never changes) will always exhibit the same amount of flexure when pointed/placed in the same position. I believe that this is true only in part, but I do beliueve that there are terms that will be repeatable, again assuming a permanent rigid setup. A second flexure term may be present as well. This one would be due to flexure that changes with time. There are multiple sources for such terms such as: 1. Loose components and screws ( I have noticed that the screws in my dovetails may loosen over a couple of years time). Another source that some people have is delrin tipped rings that hold the guide scope. These flow and tend to change with time. 2. Temperature gradients in the components. Many setups are composed of various material types, all of which have different coefficients of thermal expansion that are non-zero. For example, the thermal expansion in aluminum optical tubes is one of the reasons that we must refocus periodically and it is so predictable over temperature, that many of the automated programs allow temperature compensation for focusing. This temperature factor causes flexure over temperature ranges and is completely independent of pointing position. I don't have a figure for this, as I have assumed that it was below the "3dB" SNR point for my guiding error terms. I believe that a well set up separate guider is nearly as good if not better than some off axis guiders...especially for rigs below 2000mm FL. Well set up implies near zero mechanical flexure, other than elastic metal bending (assuming use of thick rigid metals) and thermal flexure. Many off axis guiders have enough components in them to have their own internal flexure, and with a pickoff mirror, that flexure can be amplified. I don't believe that flexure is a dominant term in my tracking or guiding. I do believe that you can model out the permanent flexure terms in guiding with enough attention to detail in the software, so I am not resisting that effort. I just wanted to point out that there are still some terms that will exist after removing these terms. Let me know what you think about this. I look foward to your new software and multi-star guiders! Thanks, Rick --- In ap-gto@..., "Ray Gralak" <rgr@...> wrote: saidSorry but you had better go back and read what I typed. I never out.flexure was not significant. I did say that it has to be modeled ofThere is no way you can arbitrarily calculate the flexure of any theour amateur telescope systems without modeling their pointing on software I havesky. There are way too many variables.I guess I don't understand then... because that's how the AP been working on is going to work. It model's the telescope'sexpected position against the actual position. From that set of data (Nmapping points across the sky) differential rates from many factors,including flexure can be used to correct both pointing accuracy and thetracking rate.
|
|