Re: Counterweight carriers?
Hi, Morgan:
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I carry three counterweights for my AP900/AP1200 in a Bucket Boss GateMouth tool bag: <http://tinyurl.com/669zru> I cut a piece of 1/8-in. Masonite to firm up and support the bag's floor, added a sheet of open-cell foam to pad the floor, and cut arched-top pieces of foam for interleaves between the three counterweights. Works like a charm. The tool bag has very strong handles, and opens wide to easily remove the weights. The only improvement that I can see would be to use closed-cell Ethafoam instead of open-cell foam, but I had a ready supply of the latter on hand. If you're coming to NEAF next weekend and the weather is decent, I will have my scope set up in the courtyard for the Solar Star Party, so you could have a look at my counterweight bag. Eric Baumgartner Redding, CT USA
On 04/18/08 9:01 AM, "Morgan Spangle" <msfainc@...> wrote:
I need a simple but effective way to carry my counterweights for the
|
|
Re: Counterweight carriers?
Bryon Schwartz <bryonnmissy@...>
How about a small camera bag that has moveable dividers. I just bought
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
a nice cheapy at Sam's Club for a new camera and the first thing I thought of when I opened it up was, "hey, this will be great for counterweights." I guess I'm making another trip back to Sam's. You can use the side pockets for all of your wires and filters. Bryon
--- In ap-gto@..., "Morgan Spangle" <msfainc@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
Dale Ghent
Rick, please excuse my naiveté with AP mounts as I'm only now
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
receiving my first one, so my question wasn't at all intended to touch a nerve and fluster those with years of experience. My reasoning was this - Seeing as how JMI offers both a USB- and RS232- controller box[1] with ASCOM driver[2] for their Motofocus, I just wanted to know if the GTOCP3 could be co-opted in place of one of those interface boxes concurrent with driving the mount itself - saving money and another thing to feed power to in one fell swoop. I figured that since the GTOCP3 has not only one but two RS232 ports and a DC output port explicitly for driving a Motofocus... I thought it would be worth a shot to at least ask. John kindly points out that such a configuration works for him, so I'll give it a go. If it doesn't end up working, I don't lose anything... I'd just need to bite the bullet and get one of JMI's motofocus USB/serial interface boxes. /dale [1] http://www.jimsmobile.com/buy_motor_controls.htm [2] http://www.jimsmobile.com/software_pcfc.htm
On Apr 19, 2008, at 1:48 AM, Rick K wrote:
Did you perhaps read through the entire message and the rest of the
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
Did you perhaps read through the entire message and the rest of the
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
messages pertaining to this issue? I even described the commands to control a DC motor driven focuser (JMI style) in one of those messages where one serial port connection could both control the mount and drive a DC motor driven focuser such as a JMI but not a servomotor or stepper driven set-up such as a Robofocus or FeatherTouch system. Now unless something drastic has changed I CANNOT hook up my ASCOM driver on my computer through the ONE serial port on it, connect it to one of the RS232 ports on the GTOCPx, run a planetarium program connected to that serial port and expect to contol a Robofocus, Feathertouch or other RS232 enabled focuser connected to the other RS232 port on the GTOCPx. If there were USB connections and a hub on the GTOCPx, that COULD make that scenario possible. As it stands right now, in order to control a Robofocus or other RS232 serial port connected focuser, it must be connected directly to the computer with the control software running on it, either through a direct serial port or, in most cases lately, with a USB to serial port converter of some sort since most newer computers no longer have serial ports. If you want to run a planetarium program such as TheSky6 or StarryNight and connect it to the GTOCPx it will require a serial cable. If you want to control a Robofocus, FeatherTouch or other RS232 enabled focuser, you will need another serial port for real time control. If you want to run Pulseguide, you will need yet another serial port as, at this time, it is not ASCOM compliant. If you want to run a camera platform rotator it will require yet another serial port. If you have a JMI DC motor driven focuser there apparently is an ASCOM driver available for it. I have no idea if or how well it works. It is supposed to be available on the Jim's Mobile website here: http://www.jimsmobile.com/top_software.htm
--- In ap-gto@..., "John Winfield" <winfij@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
John Winfield
That's not what he's asking - he's asking if he can control his JMI
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
from a PC connected to a serial port. That certainly is possible. You also don't need to connect to a different serial port to control the focuser - the ASCOM driver can control both the mount and the focuser over a single serial link - that's how I use the mount. John
--- In ap-gto@..., "Rick K" <JunkMailGoesHere@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Counterweight carriers?
Dean S
I use a couple of those soft sided 6 pack coolers for my weights. Works ok
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
but make sure the straps are strong enough. Dean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Morgan Spangle" <msfainc@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Friday, April 18, 2008 9:01 AM Subject: [ap-gto] Counterweight carriers? I need a simple but effective way to carry my counterweights for the
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
In the context of the complete response, it cannot. I cannot hook up
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
my Feathertouch or Robofocus to one of the serial ports of the AP GTOCPx controller and expect to control it from software running on an computer connected to the other serial port.
--- In ap-gto@..., chris1011@... wrote:
|
|
Compact Precision Telescope (CPT) 12.5 F4 on a 900GTO?
mvkalex
Hello,
I am new to this forum, and I was wondering if anybody has experience or have seen other folks using a 12.5 F4 CPT on a 900GTO mount. I found a thread of somebody using a 1200 with an 18 CPT, so it may be doable for a 12.5 to be mounted on a 900. My scope has a solid strut that can be used for mounting. The total weight of the scope + camera will probably be around 45lbs. Per specs, the 900GTO should not have any problems with it. At this point, I am trying to decide if I should purchase the 900GTO or place myself in the list for a Mach1 and possibly buy a small apo for astrophotography. Thanks for your help, Alex
|
|
Re: Counterweight carriers?
Morgan Spangle <msfainc@...>
Thanks for the idea about the counterweights.
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The FT is humming right along, now on my Borg 76ED...liked it so much I bought another one for my C14. Morgan
--- In ap-gto@..., "Bruce Reuben" <kroral@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
Dale Ghent
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:51 PM, chris1011@... wrote:
Alright then... would a setup such as the following be kosher?The focuser can NOT be controlled by the GTOCP3 serial ports.Yes it can. http://elektronkind.org/outbox/GTOwiring.png Thanks for the guidance, all /dale
|
|
Re: RA Axis Stiffness (talking 900s as well)
Woodwind
Rolando,
Is there no merit at all in keeping some continuous tension on one side or other of the mount for smother tracking ? I run a 900 and have always tried to keep a few pounds on the counterbalance. Perhaps it's just being a former tank gunner where you were taught to "end your lay in elevation" to take up the slack in the system before you took the shot. Murray chris1011@... wrote: In a message dated 4/17/2008 1:49:56 PM Central Daylight Time, hewholooks@... writes: > I noticed this on my new Mach1 as well. I had all the clutches > loose, and the axes moved smoothly, but had enough resistance that I > couldn't really be precise about the balance. Like you, I have had > no trouble with movenemt or guiding, however. > The Mach1 will be stiff with the clutches loose. We have always had that as a "feature" because I believe in not allowing the axes of a GEM to swing freely. It has to do with internal damping and resistance to wind load. It is absolutely not necessary to perfectly balance any of our mounts. They do not care one way or another which way you have balanced. I pay very little attention to perfect balance, even on my permanently mounted setups. It is not necessary. The motors are strong enough to pull an unbalanced load. It will NOT affect guiding or tracking, contrary to popular belief. Rolando ************** Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
If you are connecting a DC motor controlled JMI focuser to the GTOCP3
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
focuser output then yes, the focuser can be controlled from external software communicating with the mount through the serial interface. All this is in the Keypad manual as well and the pertinent commands all start with :F Whether the software you have uses and sends these commands is a different issue.
--- In ap-gto@..., Dale Ghent <daleg@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
The focuser can NOT be controlled by the GTOCP3 serial ports. Both
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
these ports are pretty much receive only except for specific commands which are requests for a response. They also do not 'daisy chain' commands which are sent to one port and out the other. If you have a serial controlled focuser it MUST be controlled from a serial port on an external computer.
--- In ap-gto@..., Dale Ghent <daleg@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
Yes, focuser control will work using a focuser connected to the GTOCPx
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
port on a supported focuser (JMI or DC motor compatible only) that responds to pulsed voltages. Any other RS232 controlled or stepper motor controlled focuser will not work connected to the serial or focuser ports on the GTOCPx controller. If you are using ASCOM to control an RS232 controlled focuser you will require a dedicated serial port on your computer for it. In addition, each instance of a serial controlled device being controlled via the ASCOM interface will require its own serial port. This is why most people try to get a USB to multi-port serial device. One port connects to and runs the focuser. Two ports are connect to the AP mount. PulseGuide gets one which replaces the hand controller and the other gets slaved to the Planetarium control program (ONE of TheSky6 or StarryNight or others) through ASCOM or directly. The final port of 4 can be used for a CCD rotator. Rick.
--- In ap-gto@..., Dale Ghent <daleg@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
Dale Ghent
On Apr 18, 2008, at 2:00 PM, Rick K wrote:
The RS232 ports on the mount are for the servo to communicate with theThat's what I thought - I just wanted to be clear on whether the focuser could also be controlled over the serial ports, not just the mount servos. ASCOM control of the focuser would be a nice feature to roll in, though. One less box to have velcro'd to the pier. /dale
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
observe_m13
It is just there to provide a variable level of power depending on the
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
keypad settings - no more and no less. The RS232 ports on the mount are for the servo to communicate with the outside world. I am almost certain they cannot be used to communicate with a focuser. They are there to talk to mount control software such as Pulseguide and the ASCOM interface which can be used by various other pieces of software. All this is detailed in the Keypad v4.12 or later (v4.15 if it is available online) documentation.
--- In ap-gto@..., Dale Ghent <daleg@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
Dale Ghent
I should qualify this further - I know that an attached focuser could then be controlled via the keypad.. but how about from an external source over a serial connection (ie, ASCOM) ?
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
/dale
On Apr 18, 2008, at 1:46 PM, Dale Ghent wrote:
|
|
CP's focuser port
Dale Ghent
Here's a question about the GTO CP's focuser port...
I know it's designed for the JMI microfocus, but I'd like some clarity on its capabilities vis a vis focuser control. It's not just there to provide power, correct? Could an attached JMI focuser be controlled via the second RS232 port (say, if the mount itself was controlled via RS232 port 1 and the focuser via RS232 port 2) Do I have this right? /dale
|
|
Re: CP's focuser port
Roland Christen
In a message dated 4/18/2008 4:01:29 PM Central Daylight Time,
daleg@... writes: Alright then... would a setup such as the following be kosher?Probably, assuming this ASCOM has the necessary focus commands in it. Rolando ************** Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos. (http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
|
|
Re: Counterweight carriers?
Bruce Reuben
Hi Morgan: I use a soft rounded tool bag sold at hardware stores for
about $5. It is about 8" diameter. I then cut 2 rounded pices of heavy rubber excercise mat and put one on the bottom, a weight on top of it, then another piece of the rubber mat, and finally the last weight. Like a sandwich. It has drawstrings at the top and takes up no room at all. You may want to add some crazy glue to the handle seams for strength. Have used it for 3 years without any problems. By the way- how is the feather-touch focuser you purchased from me on astromart?
|
|