Re: Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
Konstantin v. Poschinger
Hi Roland,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
so what do you think is the best way to handle if you are working in a combination sometimes with a computer and APCC and sometimes with the hand pad. If you have a model build without the Ortho model and you build afterwards the Ortho model. Will this influence APCC when you flip sides? Grüsse Konni Konstantin v. Poschinger Hammerichstr. 5 22605 Hamburg 040/8805747 0171/1983476 Am 19.07.2022 um 18:08 schrieb Roland Christen via groups.io <chris1011@...>:
|
|
Re: Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
Ted Mickle
The installation instructions state "MUST have version VCPx-P02-09 installed" for both CP4 and CP5 control boxes.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
However, the latest version available is VCP4-P02-08. Have I missed something, or is this a typo? Ted On Jul 19, 2022, at 10:54, Marj Christen <marj@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
Roland Christen
Yes, the Ortho model is active after a power cycle.
Roland
-----Original Message-----
From: Konstantin von Poschinger <KPoschinger@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Sent: Tue, Jul 19, 2022 1:06 am Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5! Hi Roland,
what will happen if you power cycle the mount? Is the Ortho model still working?
Grüsse
Konni
Konstantin v. Poschinger
Hammerichstr. 5
22605 Hamburg
040/8805747
0171/1983476
Am 19.07.2022 um 02:41 schrieb Roland Christen via groups.io <chris1011@...>:
-- Roland Christen Astro-Physics |
|
Re: Recal when using an APPM Model
Dale Ghent
Recals under an APCC model are fine. This option in NINA is geared towards TheSkyX+T-Point users where syncs from the app can mess up the T-Point model.
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I didn't want to put this option in NINA itself because the TSX ASCOM driver itself has an option to ignore syncs from the app to protect the T-Point model - and really it should be doing this automatically since it can use the TSX API to know if T-Point is active or not, obviating the need to manually control this option there. But the user demanded that this option be in NINA because they, for some unarticulated reason, didn't trust or didn't want to use the built-in option in the TSX ASCOM driver to block syncs. They were very... vocal and insistent, to describe it diplomatically... about their belief that NINA itself needed this option and it was provided in the hopes that they'd move on. Thankfully, they did. I believe I saw them list a Paramount on Amart some months later. So goes life in this peculiar microcosm of astro software. On Jul 19, 2022, at 10:10, Andrew J <andjones132@...> wrote: |
|
CP4 Power Connector Type
W Hilmo
Does anyone know the type of connector for the power cable on a CP4?
I have a bunch of DeWalt cordless tools, so have plenty of batteries. I picked up an adapter that lets me connect a PowerPole to this type of battery, so now I have the battery sitting on the floor of the RA assembly. The standard power cord is much longer than it needs to be for this, so I would like to make one that is an appropriate length. I could just hack up the stock cable, but I would prefer to keep it intact as a spare. Thanks, -Wade |
|
Re: Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
Thanks for the report, Wade!
Clear Skies, Marj Christen Astro-Physics 11250 Forest Hills Road Machesney Park, IL 61115 Phone: 815-282-1513 www.astro-physics.com
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
On Behalf Of W Hilmo
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 10:52 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
I just thought that I'd send an update that I had a chance to play with this last night, and it works great! On 7/18/22 5:13 PM, W Hilmo wrote:
|
|
Re: Keypad V5.010 available for GTOCP4 and GTOCP5!
W Hilmo
I just thought that I'd send an update that I had a chance to play
with this last night, and it works great!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The goto accuracy on my C14 with the ortho model is much better than it was previously. And it seems that my keypad battery is still working, even after all these years. Go figure. I've updated all of my CP4 controllers with the modeling license. Normally, I do all my imaging with APCC Pro running on a NUC, but at some point, I'll probably play with the tracking models that are now available without a computer. -Wade On 7/18/22 5:13 PM, W Hilmo wrote:
I am on P02-13 and I got the same thing. The two options in the loader are code only and database only. |
|
Recal when using an APPM Model
Andrew J
Hope you all can help with some questions I have about APCC Pointing Models and Sync commands. I have started to see options show up in programs like N.I.N.A that say "Do Not Sync", with the tool tip that states "When enabled the application will never send a sync command to the telescope. This should only be used when having a good pointing model that should not be altered in any way." So does this mean that if I have a mount with encoders and I am using a Pointing Model that was created in APPM that I would turn on this option and not send Sync commands to the telescope? If you have a mount with encoders on a permenant pier, do you ever need to send a Sync command to the telescope? Does it hurt anythign if you do?
Thanks for the info. Andrew J |
|
Re: Mach2GTO-L cross-threading cw shaft?
#Mach2GTO
George
P,
Most excellent…a happy ending…
Regards,
George
George Whitney Astro-Physics, Inc. Phone: 815-222-6538 (direct line) Phone: 815-282-1513 (office) Email: george@... Video Tutorials: https://www.youtube.com/astrophysicscorp
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
On Behalf Of Peds
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2022 9:38 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Mach2GTO-L cross-threading cw shaft?
Hi all, A-P could make a fortune selling mount Dopp kits - bespoke toothbrush, scented lubes… just saying! ;) Thanks for the suggestions and hope this thread helps someone else in the future. |
|
Re: Mach2GTO-L cross-threading cw shaft?
#Mach2GTO
Hi all, A-P could make a fortune selling mount Dopp kits - bespoke toothbrush, scented lubes… just saying! ;) Thanks for the suggestions and hope this thread helps someone else in the future. |
|
Re : Re: [ap-gto] Installing GTOCP4 firmware version VCP4-P02-13
Yves Laroche
Hi Brian,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
It worked just fine for you probably because the USBserialUtilities_VSU-06.jar file was already associated to be opened with the Java platform. Mine was associated as a zip file even after installing the Java platform so I had to right-click the file and used the "Open with" associated with the Java Platform. Why the Java installer did not associate the file with the Java platform by default is a mystery. Regards, Yves Le 18/07/22 22:52, Brian Valente <bvalente@...> a écrit :
|
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Ray Gralak
Chris,
Would it be helpful for me to include the logs for the session where I collected these two test subs?Thanks, but I don't need any logs or additional testing for this issue. I can purposely polar misalign my mount to test the all-sky model. -Ray |
|
Re: Mach2GTO-L cross-threading cw shaft?
#Mach2GTO
Ted Moss
@Peds: I have been having an instructive email exchange with George Whitney. @Cytan: I as well…have read your posting. Quite the read.
1. I have used a machinist scribe with the short bend..to trace out the internal mount threading for the counter weight shaft. Next, used both a raised nylon brush…then short raised nylon brush. 2. Applied same procedure for external counter weight shaft. Wiped off excess anti seize lubricant. 3. Went 2-1/4 revolutions from having the Dec upside down and also right side up. The binding is very pronounced after 2-1/4 revolutions. I wouldn’t apply a rubber strap to go any further. From my novice observations..I’ve done all recommendations; but I have an impression that this might be something to confirm with George as far as the machining of the shaft. I wish I knew someone who had a Mach 2 locally...where upon….I could check my counter weight shaft threading to another Mach 2. I might ring up a local (Agena Astro or OPT)..to see if they have a Mach 2. 4. Thank you for everyone’s suggestions….!!
|
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Chris White
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 09:28 AM, Ray Gralak wrote:
Hi Chris, Thanks Ray. It's not urgent, just opening up the discussion in case there is something under the hood causing this. I'll do more testing when I can to try and replicate the issue. I've never done DEC arc before. I have a perm setup so always just did AllSky. I've also always guided with a non encoder Mount. Going unguided is new for me as I just received the mach2. Would it be helpful for me to include the logs for the session where I collected these two test subs? |
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Ray Gralak
Hi Chris,
Until I can investigate and find a solution, which may not be immediately, you should either disable PA or use Dec-Arc tracking, which is superior to all-sky tracking. -Ray |
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Ray Gralak
Bill,
I don’t understand the immediacy of the issue. If you are getting better tracking in all-sky mode with PA off, then do so. That’s the temporary workaround until I can look into this.
However, you should get better results using Dec Arc tracking unless the plate solve data is not accurate enough.
-Ray
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long
Sent: Monday, July 18, 2022 11:24 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Mach2 and Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
That image of CCDI was heavily shrunk:
Aspect is their metric for star roundness. I think this tells it all.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Long <bill@...>
Ray / AP,
Well, the theory sounded good, actual usage showed otherwise.
New model, much denser, 1 degree separation, the whole nine yards.
Eggy stars with PA correction enabled in APCC model terms. Eggy stars gone with it off. Confirmed in "true Dec Arc mode"
Something isn't right, and we are not talking about a minor difference here folks:
While I understand the intent of the design here, I think multiple users (Bill, Chris, Linwood) expressing problems is worth digging into.
Log Zip and FITS here: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/4sruc4u7644d8kc/AACPhhdWJeaR5tY3AbgXcGQra?dl=0
I think something is not right with the code here, please look into this with urgency.
Thanks, Bill
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Long <bill@...>
Found an object to test on now. Ray is correct there is zero change in the tracking rate no matter what I change, PA correction or refraction correction the rate remains the same.
So unchecking these boxes had nothing to do with why my stars went round.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Long <bill@...>
I found the log entry, which will work fine for now. As soon as this object gets high enough I will test again.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Ray Gralak <iogroups@...>
> Might be useful for an indicator in the UI as to which mode the tracking correction is in. |
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Ray Gralak
Hi Bill,
Eggy stars with PA correction enabled in APCC model terms.It's unclear what you are stating here. Is the issue with all-sky tracking or dec arc tracking? If the mount is in true dec arc mode, there is no tracking difference with PA correction on/off. If there is trailing in dec arc mode, then it could be that the source data points (via plate solves) are not accurate enough, or something in the setup has changed. -Ray |
|
Re: Older 1100GTO balance question
Worsel
I use the same approach as Marc.
A-P sells an inline DC meter from Powerwerx that goes downstream of your power supply. The screen is easy to read and uses Powerpole connectors. https://www.astro-physics.com/cabppwm Bryan |
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
Chris White
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 08:22 AM, Brian Valente wrote:
Brian, Yes. Unguided. |
|
Re: Eggy Stars with Polar Axis Correction
ap@CaptivePhotons.com
On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 02:16 AM, Bill Long wrote:
While I understand the intent of the design here, I think multiple users (Bill, Chris, Linwood) expressing problems is worth digging into.Just to be clear, while I am not getting the unguided performance people seem to expect, I would characterize me as still learning to drive properly rather than really saying the car is not steering correctly, yet. If I could get some clear nights I'd know more. Also, I have a different mount (no idea if that matters). I have not tried turning off and on specific aspects of the model, though I can next clear night. Possible break in the clouds Wednesday. Linwood |
|