|
Re: V2 Driver not connecting to APCC Pro
Hi Ray,
Thanks for you quick reply. The only software installed in a long time (months) besides unavoidable Windows 10 updates, was the update to APCC Pro 1.7.1.5. But I did try something for the
Hi Ray,
Thanks for you quick reply. The only software installed in a long time (months) besides unavoidable Windows 10 updates, was the update to APCC Pro 1.7.1.5. But I did try something for the
|
By
Forrest Sims
·
#67650
·
|
|
Re: ? response on CP3 bottom serial port
Hi William,
Have you tried the same set of commands while connected to the top port?
-Ray Gralak
Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
Hi William,
Have you tried the same set of commands while connected to the top port?
-Ray Gralak
Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
|
By
Ray Gralak
·
#67649
·
|
|
Re: V2 Driver not connecting to APCC Pro
Hi Forrest,
That error has nothing to do with APCC. The error means that the VB6 runtime used by the driver is old, perhaps because of something else you installed. You might be able to fix this be
Hi Forrest,
That error has nothing to do with APCC. The error means that the VB6 runtime used by the driver is old, perhaps because of something else you installed. You might be able to fix this be
|
By
Ray Gralak
·
#67648
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Hi Maarten,
I've installed and tried out NoMachine. Very impressive! It's fast as well. I think I'll be using NoMachine to during my next imaging session.
Thanks for the recommendation.
cytan
Hi Maarten,
I've installed and tried out NoMachine. Very impressive! It's fast as well. I think I'll be using NoMachine to during my next imaging session.
Thanks for the recommendation.
cytan
|
By
Cheng-Yang Tan
·
#67647
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
When I spoke with TV's customer service to find out why I was cut off, they expressly told me that their application detects whether quickbooks or certain other applications are running as part of
When I spoke with TV's customer service to find out why I was cut off, they expressly told me that their application detects whether quickbooks or certain other applications are running as part of
|
By
Victoria Berger
·
#67646
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Hi all,
I've read this thread with some amusement, as there are some pretty wild theories and terminology being put forth as fact. I'm not a TV user and have avoided using it to save myself from the
Hi all,
I've read this thread with some amusement, as there are some pretty wild theories and terminology being put forth as fact. I'm not a TV user and have avoided using it to save myself from the
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#67645
·
|
|
Re: Quickest way to get accurate goto's with a Mach1??
These issues usually boil down to a configuration issue.
It's important to think of the keypad as another client to the control box for the mount, as your computer and the Astro-Physics ASCOM driver
These issues usually boil down to a configuration issue.
It's important to think of the keypad as another client to the control box for the mount, as your computer and the Astro-Physics ASCOM driver
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#67644
·
|
|
Re: Quickest way to get accurate goto's with a Mach1??
These issues usually boil down to a configuration issue.
It's important to think of the keypad as another client to the control box for the mount, as your computer and the Astro-Physics ASCOM driver
These issues usually boil down to a configuration issue.
It's important to think of the keypad as another client to the control box for the mount, as your computer and the Astro-Physics ASCOM driver
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#67643
·
|
|
V2 Driver not connecting to APCC Pro
Hi Ray,
I am out of business.
I updated to version 1.7.1.5 and now I get this error msg every time I try to connect the V2 drive to APCC Pro.
Thank you
Forrest Sims
Hi Ray,
I am out of business.
I updated to version 1.7.1.5 and now I get this error msg every time I try to connect the V2 drive to APCC Pro.
Thank you
Forrest Sims
|
By
Forrest Sims
·
#67642
·
|
|
Re: ? response on CP3 bottom serial port
Ray,
I was just trying to troubleshoot an invalid response coming from the CP3 for some commands.
Was trying to slave my AP900 CP3 to another mount. Everything works great 99.99% of the time.
But
Ray,
I was just trying to troubleshoot an invalid response coming from the CP3 for some commands.
Was trying to slave my AP900 CP3 to another mount. Everything works great 99.99% of the time.
But
|
By
William
·
#67641
·
|
|
Re: Quickest way to get accurate goto's with a Mach1??
Peter,
As before it really helps if you address all the questions. How sure are you about the keypad settings? Have you double checked the date, time, and location settings? Do you have a copy of
Peter,
As before it really helps if you address all the questions. How sure are you about the keypad settings? Have you double checked the date, time, and location settings? Do you have a copy of
|
By
Steve Reilly
·
#67640
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Hi Maarten,
I use it behind a firewall so I it should be ok. But I'll look at NoMachine.
Thanks!
cytan
Hi Maarten,
I use it behind a firewall so I it should be ok. But I'll look at NoMachine.
Thanks!
cytan
|
By
Cheng-Yang Tan
·
#67639
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
UltraVNC is not secure, even when using an encryption plugin. The password can only be 8 characters (embedded in protocol) so a brute force attack is quite easy.
Take a look at NoMachine
UltraVNC is not secure, even when using an encryption plugin. The password can only be 8 characters (embedded in protocol) so a brute force attack is quite easy.
Take a look at NoMachine
|
By
Maarten Vanleenhove
·
#67638
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Hi Joe,
I found TV definition of "non-commercial" to be too onerous.
Anyhow, I'd suggest looking at UltraVNC. At least on my home network, it's not only a lot faster, it is also stable.
As
Hi Joe,
I found TV definition of "non-commercial" to be too onerous.
Anyhow, I'd suggest looking at UltraVNC. At least on my home network, it's not only a lot faster, it is also stable.
As
|
By
Cheng-Yang Tan
·
#67637
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Hi Cheng,
You probably weren’t cut off by TV, for simply “reading email” – BUT rather ... for reading email “on a corporate site”.
That sets off TV alarm bells! The Snooper program
Hi Cheng,
You probably weren’t cut off by TV, for simply “reading email” – BUT rather ... for reading email “on a corporate site”.
That sets off TV alarm bells! The Snooper program
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#67636
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
Same happened to me a few times, I explained them a few times I am not a commercial user but all in vane and so I deleted TeamViewer and since then I am using AnyDesk
regards Rainer
Same happened to me a few times, I explained them a few times I am not a commercial user but all in vane and so I deleted TeamViewer and since then I am using AnyDesk
regards Rainer
|
By
Rainer
·
#67635
·
|
|
Re: Off Topic - repetitive TeamViewer Screw-ups
I had this problem with Team Viewer last year and it took a written statement from me to prove that I was using TV for private, non-commercial use. About a month later, they approved my use and turned
I had this problem with Team Viewer last year and it took a written statement from me to prove that I was using TV for private, non-commercial use. About a month later, they approved my use and turned
|
By
dvjbaja
·
#67634
·
|
|
Re: Quickest way to get accurate goto's with a Mach1??
I have a permanent setup....Mach1 on a concrete pier; Celestron Edge HD1100 with a focal reducer is currently mounted. I really "upgraded" (hopefully) from the CGEM to enable long exposures with that
I have a permanent setup....Mach1 on a concrete pier; Celestron Edge HD1100 with a focal reducer is currently mounted. I really "upgraded" (hopefully) from the CGEM to enable long exposures with that
|
By
Peter Bresler
·
#67633
·
Edited
|
|
Re: ? response on CP3 bottom serial port
Hi William,
You wrote:
Assuming you checked the baud rate settings are correct (9600 baud, 8 bits, 1 stop bit, no parity), what is the entire command sequence you are trying to send including the
Hi William,
You wrote:
Assuming you checked the baud rate settings are correct (9600 baud, 8 bits, 1 stop bit, no parity), what is the entire command sequence you are trying to send including the
|
By
Ray Gralak
·
#67632
·
|
|
Re: ? response on CP3 bottom serial port
The commands are formatted correctly.
After sending the following as a test it sent back a ? after several hundred.
Sent :Sr 07:07:00.0#
Received: ?
Previous and next sending of the same command
The commands are formatted correctly.
After sending the following as a test it sent back a ? after several hundred.
Sent :Sr 07:07:00.0#
Received: ?
Previous and next sending of the same command
|
By
William
·
#67631
·
|