Bill, I can't be sure because I don't have one of those cameras but this issue might not affect PEC acquisition since only one full frame image ever needs to be in memory at a time. From what you

Yes, extensively, step-by-step. I'll try to email you off-group. Thank you, Rick

Hi Rick, Happy for you that you feast with your Mach2 and I am only more impatient to receive mine. Wayne and Terri who received their Mach2 at the beginning of March had N ° 14 and N ° 15, do you

Roland and Marj: It seems that Ray is not interested in fixing this problem, and would rather blame Microsoft (inappropriately, and incorrectly) for this problem. A-P -- there is a huge problem with

Thanks for the history lesson. Fix the software and stop blaming Microsoft.

Bitmaps, the class in .Net Framework, is not the same as the low-level bitmaps in windows that I think you are talking about. And it's not 30 years old... only about 20 years old, which is why the

I believe that may be because you are pointed very near to the NCP. Try slewing away from the pole and see if the box gets checked.

The problem IS NOT on the .Net Framework, Ray. The camera works perfectly fine with other software that uses the same framework. Bitmaps... which PEMPro uses, should be suspect. Why the hell does

Bill, The problem is that the .NET framework cannot allocate enough memory with a camera with that many pixels. It could be fixed by Microsoft increasing the .NET Framework GDI+ memory limit above

Is non-functional. The frames even binned 4x4 do not work. The software is broken and a LOT of people depend on this to work. We need immediate fixes!

Yes. -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center): https://www.astro-physics.com/apcc-pro Author of PEMPro V3: https://www.ccdware.com Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver:

I'm using AE's and also have APPM running - but only "Enable Tracking Correction" is on by default. Should I also have "Enable Pointing Correction" on?

David, I just received my Mach 2 a few days ago and I'm very happy to report that the learning curve is minimal. Then again, I'm an IT person. The most trouble I have had was an Intel i5 windows

I have an AP1200 and I was planning to buy APCC Pro, but I was laid off from my part-time copy editing job, so hobby funds are scarce at the moment. I know APCC will improve pointing accuracy, but I

I believe if you raise your altitude axis, turn the altitude knob clockwise about 1/4 turn, you will see your RA drift diminish. You can then go from there to null it out. Roland

Roland, I ran the clock test for 12 hours and there was no drift in the time. That would indicate the crystal oscillator is well within the accuracy required since a 0.1% drift would be 43 seconds in

I've opted not to buy Pro while it was available discounted (on a time limit). Being purely a mobile setup/takedown observer, I haven't uncovered any use cases where I actually needed the Pro

Hi Steve Just a comment on your pier: Make surethat the top of the pier is perfectly flat and that you can not feel anywobble when you sit the RA axis in place and try to rock it back and forth.Once

You can do modeling, unguided imaging and a lot more. Roland

I actually have the same question. And I have been doing everything just as Steve said. I could have written that email 😎 Also lovin this mount. Mikey