|
Method for scope balancing with minimum risk.
I had a situation where i added a heavy reducer and camera making the scope quite back-heavy. I couldn't slide the tube any further in the rings, so needed to loosen the dovetail to slide the bar
I had a situation where i added a heavy reducer and camera making the scope quite back-heavy. I couldn't slide the tube any further in the rings, so needed to loosen the dovetail to slide the bar
|
By
Wayne Hixson
·
#55487
·
|
|
Re: 130GTX Autofocus
Thanks Don, to the best of my measurements, it's about 0.96 microns/step. I'm going to round it out to 1. It's used by my autofocus software in it's calculations
Thanks Don, to the best of my measurements, it's about 0.96 microns/step. I'm going to round it out to 1. It's used by my autofocus software in it's calculations
|
By
Wayne Hixson
·
#55486
·
|
|
Re: 130GTX Autofocus
Wayne
I have the Focus BossII system as well and run two focusers from the hub. Works very well.
The step size is a function of the gear ratio of the focuser you are running. The best way to figure
Wayne
I have the Focus BossII system as well and run two focusers from the hub. Works very well.
The step size is a function of the gear ratio of the focuser you are running. The best way to figure
|
By
Don Anderson
·
#55485
·
|
|
130GTX Autofocus
Just installed an Optec Focus Boss II with HSM motor on my 130GTX - what a sweet combination. Smooth as silk and handles my cameras with ease.
Just a minor question for those who may have the same
Just installed an Optec Focus Boss II with HSM motor on my 130GTX - what a sweet combination. Smooth as silk and handles my cameras with ease.
Just a minor question for those who may have the same
|
By
Wayne Hixson
·
#55484
·
|
|
Re: INDI Support for Extended LX200 AP Commands?
there are indi drivers in the wild and in the works using the lx200 command set already. It's being developed for different mounts but the lx200 protocol is pretty universal. Should work with ap
there are indi drivers in the wild and in the works using the lx200 command set already. It's being developed for different mounts but the lx200 protocol is pretty universal. Should work with ap
|
By
dave@...
·
#55483
·
|
|
INDI Support for Extended LX200 AP Commands?
Hello all,
I am curious if there are plans to allow for non-Windows systems to take advantage of the commands that the CP4 guide and Hand Control mention are not released at this time. While I am a
Hello all,
I am curious if there are plans to allow for non-Windows systems to take advantage of the commands that the CP4 guide and Hand Control mention are not released at this time. While I am a
|
By
Bill Long
·
#55482
·
|
|
Re: Using Two Guiders on One AP-1200
Greg
JUST as I sent this, it dawned on me. You have a camera mounted!!
Sorry
bryan
Greg
JUST as I sent this, it dawned on me. You have a camera mounted!!
Sorry
bryan
|
By
Worsel
·
#55481
·
|
|
Re: Using Two Guiders on One AP-1200
Greg
Maybe I am missing something.
Use a bright star, for example, that is easy to ID even naked eye. Sirius, Procyon, Capella are good right now.
Bryan
---In ap-gto@..., <fyrframe@...> wrote
Greg
Maybe I am missing something.
Use a bright star, for example, that is easy to ID even naked eye. Sirius, Procyon, Capella are good right now.
Bryan
---In ap-gto@..., <fyrframe@...> wrote
|
By
Worsel
·
#55480
·
|
|
Re: Mounting a Green Laser
Greg,
Since Bryan wrote that the spreading green laserbeam would be visible in the FOV of the OTA, why not try adjusting thelaser pointing while taking quick focus snapshots through the main
Greg,
Since Bryan wrote that the spreading green laserbeam would be visible in the FOV of the OTA, why not try adjusting thelaser pointing while taking quick focus snapshots through the main
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#55479
·
|
|
Re: Mounting a Green Laser
Thanks Bryan.
That would require me to identify which star I am looking at, through the scope, using my naked eye. Unlike a finder which adds a little magnification to assist in that
Thanks Bryan.
That would require me to identify which star I am looking at, through the scope, using my naked eye. Unlike a finder which adds a little magnification to assist in that
|
By
Gregory <fyrframe@...>
·
#55478
·
|
|
Pempro 1st time use
I did my my first run at trying to collect data on my mount the other night and ran into a problem. I would start the cycle of collecting the data and it would just stop taking samples sometimes in
I did my my first run at trying to collect data on my mount the other night and ran into a problem. I would start the cycle of collecting the data and it would just stop taking samples sometimes in
|
By
Adam Ament
·
#55477
·
|
|
Re: pointing models and sync
On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:05 PM, leporej@... [ap-gto] <ap-gto@...> wrote:
After building a pointing model and enabling it should you do a sync after a plate solve while using focus max or
On Mar 8, 2017, at 11:05 PM, leporej@... [ap-gto] <ap-gto@...> wrote:
After building a pointing model and enabling it should you do a sync after a plate solve while using focus max or
|
By
Mark Dearing
·
#55476
·
|
|
pointing models and sync
After building a pointing model and enabling it should you do a sync after a plate solve while using focus max or any other program after a plate solve?
Thanks
Joe
After building a pointing model and enabling it should you do a sync after a plate solve while using focus max or any other program after a plate solve?
Thanks
Joe
|
By
Joseph Lepore
·
#55475
·
|
|
APCC Send Limit to SGPro and West Limits
I'm starting to use SGPro and clicked on "Send Limit to SGPro" in the "Meridian" tab of APCC. The help message that pops up says "Counterweight Up Slews within West Limits must be enabled", so I
I'm starting to use SGPro and clicked on "Send Limit to SGPro" in the "Meridian" tab of APCC. The help message that pops up says "Counterweight Up Slews within West Limits must be enabled", so I
|
By
Eric Claeys
·
#55474
·
|
|
Pointing Model in APCC Pro 1.5.0.20
I am still running the last official release of APCC Pro v1.0.3.4 ("never touch a running system"), but I do consider an update to the latest public beta. Before updating, I would like to know if the
I am still running the last official release of APCC Pro v1.0.3.4 ("never touch a running system"), but I do consider an update to the latest public beta. Before updating, I would like to know if the
|
By
Karsten.Schindler@...
·
#55473
·
|
|
Re: Mach1GTO DEC axis not working
Most common problem of a used mount being shipped to a new owner is damage during shipping due to less than ideal packing. What happens is the motor boxes get pushed hard into the worm wheel which
Most common problem of a used mount being shipped to a new owner is damage during shipping due to less than ideal packing. What happens is the motor boxes get pushed hard into the worm wheel which
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#55472
·
|
|
Re: Mach1GTO DEC axis not working
I would check the Y cable first , next check if Dec axis I jammed
Suresh
I would check the Y cable first , next check if Dec axis I jammed
Suresh
|
By
Suresh Mohan
·
#55471
·
|
|
Re: Mach1GTO DEC axis not working
Remesh the DEC axis. You can find a instruction on the website.
Grüsse
Konstantin v. Poschinger
Hammerichstr. 5
22605 Hamburg
040/8805747
0171/1983476
Am 08.03.2017 um 03:26 schrieb radial195@...
Remesh the DEC axis. You can find a instruction on the website.
Grüsse
Konstantin v. Poschinger
Hammerichstr. 5
22605 Hamburg
040/8805747
0171/1983476
Am 08.03.2017 um 03:26 schrieb radial195@...
|
By
Konstantin von Poschinger
·
#55469
·
|
|
Re: Mach1GTO DEC axis not working
First thing I would check (after pinging the previous owner aboutwhat he/she might know about it) would be the motor Y-cable. Allconnections tight? Does one end looked pulled from the connector a
First thing I would check (after pinging the previous owner aboutwhat he/she might know about it) would be the motor Y-cable. Allconnections tight? Does one end looked pulled from the connector a
|
By
Christopher Erickson
·
#55470
·
|
|
Re: MACH1 GTOCP4 - BALANCE QUESTION
Ideally it would be best to get both axes balanced, however the best tracking will be with the RA axis balanced. The motors can handle quite a bit of unbalance, but the RA wants to have smooth
Ideally it would be best to get both axes balanced, however the best tracking will be with the RA axis balanced. The motors can handle quite a bit of unbalance, but the RA wants to have smooth
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#55467
·
|