On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 11:42 AM, Roland Christen wrote: You probably could, but the spacing would be different. I would need to run the design to see what spacing would be best. RolandI would be

On Tue, Dec 28, 2021 at 05:28 PM, Roland Christen wrote: I need to know what happens if you take a short 1 sec and a 5 second exposure. Rolando Yep, I was doing that test when the clouds attacked.

I need to know what happens if you take a short 1 sec and a 5 second exposure. Rolando

I am a retired electrical engineer that worked for a power company. Some things to look as culprits: -Too long DC runs or small gauge wire size. DC drops voltage off very quickly as either long runs

When AAP would start guiding it would nudge the mount, then nudge the mount, and nudge mount until it lost the guide star. I learned that in the hand controller to set; Button rate 1x Guide rate

I'm not an ASIAir user... however when I first got my Mach2 i would image without guiding. It seemed to work fine with the AP130GT. I don't have an observatory, so I need to setup (nearly) nightly,

Wes, For my more beginner use cases (FL<1000mm) i was just guiding without any modeling and my Mach1 worked just fine for EAA using the ASIAIR. If you have an encoder mount then modeling can be an

Last night I was able to do some tests, but the clouds interrupted the process. As preliminary results this happens on the Ra axis. Also when testing with modeling off the stars are slightly less

Thanks, Im a long time fan of Maurice’s imaging. So you had issues on cp3, Im wondering if all cp versions are dependent on an hc now.

Thanks Arvind, good to know that cp4 is working. The mount modeling is mainly beneficial if you want to avoid guiding correct? Also Im wondering, do hou need the astrophysics hc at all to automate

Wes, I can also confirm AAP works while not the greatest marriage. Took me a little fussing to get the guiding correct as those have to be set in the hand controller, but once set it works just fine

Wow that would be fantastic! I already have the QTCC and connection pieces to the focuser and would love to stay with AP Field Flattener if it would give good results. I'm using a QHY268M (APS-C)

I know people that used it with the ED version of the TEC140. I believe they used the same spacing called out for the Quad TCC and the TEC140 with good results.

You probably could, but the spacing would be different. I would need to run the design to see what spacing would be best. Roland

Curious if anyone has used the AP 13035FF with a TEC140FL? Thanks! Scott

Hi Wes, I've used ASIAIR Pro with CP4. Modeling is not supported but regular mount use including parking (default park position), GoTo, sync etc were working reliably.

Hello, I have been using the ASI Air Pro and Plus now for the last 2 years and it has really made my imaging experience a very reliable, repeatable, and failsafe process. Eliminating a PC from my

Joe Zeglinski wrote: I wonder if that “power event” was actually a daily scheduled one, for your UPS “Testing Itself”. It would be very brief, possibly just dipping its backup

Hi, I wonder if that “power event” was actually a daily scheduled one, for your UPS “Testing Itself”. It would be very brief, possibly just dipping its backup battery to make sure it

Mike I actually talked to the owner (Bob) on the day the AP group was notified. He was the second owner of that scope and had a TEC 180 and another one smaller than the 155 he was