|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
Yep, T-ripper is good to process 1000 mosaic tiles done with 16803.
-jg
Yep, T-ripper is good to process 1000 mosaic tiles done with 16803.
-jg
|
By
dvjbaja
·
#74448
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
End-game for me is a 155/7, so this is good to know!
That's why the silicon gods granted us ThreadRipper! TRs help immensely even with the 60mp images of the IMX455 cameras. I'm waiting
End-game for me is a 155/7, so this is good to know!
That's why the silicon gods granted us ThreadRipper! TRs help immensely even with the 60mp images of the IMX455 cameras. I'm waiting
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#74447
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
Yep, the 67 flatteners that came with my 155 f/7 and 180 f/7 create a lovely 100mm image circle with minimum vignetting and great sharpness across the entire circle.
A large array for that full
Yep, the 67 flatteners that came with my 155 f/7 and 180 f/7 create a lovely 100mm image circle with minimum vignetting and great sharpness across the entire circle.
A large array for that full
|
By
dvjbaja
·
#74446
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
The 67PF flatteners will cover 67mm with hardly any vignetting. In fact any of our flatteners will do it.
Rolando
The 67PF flatteners will cover 67mm with hardly any vignetting. In fact any of our flatteners will do it.
Rolando
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#74445
·
|
|
Re: Pickering's Triangle
Thank you very much for the positive comments!
The ASI1600MM in spite of all its well known limitations is a wonderful little camera, especially for narrowband imaging. I have a QHY 294M coming that
Thank you very much for the positive comments!
The ASI1600MM in spite of all its well known limitations is a wonderful little camera, especially for narrowband imaging. I have a QHY 294M coming that
|
By
Luca Marinelli
·
#74444
·
|
|
Re: Pickering's Triangle
Excellent! The ASI1600MM sure does a fine job in the hands of an expert user.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image
Excellent! The ASI1600MM sure does a fine job in the hands of an expert user.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image
|
By
Dean Jacobsen
·
#74443
·
|
|
Re: Pickering's Triangle
Wow, that’s gorgeous, Luca. It has a wonderful artistic quality. Thank you for sharing, and we’re delighted to hear you’re making good use of your astro-gear!
Karen
AP
From:
Wow, that’s gorgeous, Luca. It has a wonderful artistic quality. Thank you for sharing, and we’re delighted to hear you’re making good use of your astro-gear!
Karen
AP
From:
|
By
Karen Christen
·
#74442
·
|
|
Re: Do NOT use ASCOM Platform v. 6.5 with APCC Pro
#APCC
#ASCOM_V2_Driver
I’ve also un-pinned this thread from the top of the Messages list on the ap-gto Groups.io group. That was probably misleading, as well.
Karen
AP
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io
I’ve also un-pinned this thread from the top of the Messages list on the ap-gto Groups.io group. That was probably misleading, as well.
Karen
AP
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io
|
By
Karen Christen
·
#74441
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
Roland,
Of course no one knows what lies in the future, but I believe FLI already offers cameras with sensor diagonals of around 87mm.
Too expensive for me at this point, but once retirement rolls
Roland,
Of course no one knows what lies in the future, but I believe FLI already offers cameras with sensor diagonals of around 87mm.
Too expensive for me at this point, but once retirement rolls
|
By
Jeffrey Patrick
·
#74440
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
The Sony IMX411 is 67mm on the diagonal, 151mp (14304x10748, 3.76um). It's the medium format version of the IMX455. I would absolutely love to be able to image with such a sensor and the fov on a 155
The Sony IMX411 is 67mm on the diagonal, 151mp (14304x10748, 3.76um). It's the medium format version of the IMX455. I would absolutely love to be able to image with such a sensor and the fov on a 155
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#74439
·
|
|
Re: 140/155 4” Field Flatteners
The PF562 field flatteners cover 65mm easily. Do you think there will ever be larger chips?
Rolando
The PF562 field flatteners cover 65mm easily. Do you think there will ever be larger chips?
Rolando
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#74438
·
|
|
140/155 4” Field Flatteners
Roland,
What about larger chips in the future?
I made the mistake of not ordering it when I received my 140 back in 2008 and have been looking out for one on Astromart for quite some time.
Jeff
Roland,
What about larger chips in the future?
I made the mistake of not ordering it when I received my 140 back in 2008 and have been looking out for one on Astromart for quite some time.
Jeff
|
By
Jeffrey Patrick
·
#74437
·
|
|
Re: 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
Nobody uses film any more.
Rolando
Nobody uses film any more.
Rolando
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#74436
·
|
|
Re: Pickering's Triangle
Beautiful Luca! Well done!
Don Anderson
On Friday, November 27, 2020, 10:48:10 a.m. MST, Luca Marinelli <photo@...> wrote:
Beautiful Luca! Well done!
Don Anderson
On Friday, November 27, 2020, 10:48:10 a.m. MST, Luca Marinelli <photo@...> wrote:
|
By
Don Anderson
·
#74435
·
|
|
Re: 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
I had written to AP back in 2019 about the correct FF for my 130 f/6 Starfire EDF and George said I needed the 67PF562. I did not purchase a 67PF562 at that time.
It seems that George may have made
I had written to AP back in 2019 about the correct FF for my 130 f/6 Starfire EDF and George said I needed the 67PF562. I did not purchase a 67PF562 at that time.
It seems that George may have made
|
By
Jerry
·
#74434
·
|
|
Re: [ap-ug] [ap-gto] 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
I’d like to second this request!
From: <main@ap-ug.groups.io> on behalf of "Jeffrey Patrick via groups.io" <Jpvettenut@...>
Reply-To: "main@ap-ug.groups.io" <main@ap-ug.groups.io>
Date: Friday,
I’d like to second this request!
From: <main@ap-ug.groups.io> on behalf of "Jeffrey Patrick via groups.io" <Jpvettenut@...>
Reply-To: "main@ap-ug.groups.io" <main@ap-ug.groups.io>
Date: Friday,
|
By
James Stone
·
#74433
·
|
|
Re: 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
Some clarification is in order:
67PF56, this is the part number for the original field flattener for the 130 f6 StarFire EDFS. This is the one that we are considering making optics for. The design
Some clarification is in order:
67PF56, this is the part number for the original field flattener for the 130 f6 StarFire EDFS. This is the one that we are considering making optics for. The design
|
By
Marj Christen
·
#74432
·
|
|
Re: [ap-ug] [ap-gto] 140/155 Starfire 4” Field Flatteners
Re-sent under new subject line...
Roland,
Re-sent under new subject line...
Roland,
|
By
Jeffrey Patrick
·
#74431
·
|
|
Re: 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
Roland,
Any interest /possibility in a run of the 4” FF for the 155/140??
Jeff
Roland,
Any interest /possibility in a run of the 4” FF for the 155/140??
Jeff
|
By
Jeffrey Patrick
·
#74430
·
|
|
Re: 130 EDF Starfire Field Flatteners
Right here:
3.5" Rotating Focuser Endcap. Required for TEC Refractors to use QUADTCC. Threads into TEC Focusers (S35RFAA) - Astro-Physics (astro-physics.com)
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Right here:
3.5" Rotating Focuser Endcap. Required for TEC Refractors to use QUADTCC. Threads into TEC Focusers (S35RFAA) - Astro-Physics (astro-physics.com)
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io
|
By
Bill Long
·
#74429
·
|