|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
I would love to see the results with that scope. I have been considering the smaller one.
Robert
I would love to see the results with that scope. I have been considering the smaller one.
Robert
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68375
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Thanks. I have a pier set up in my backyard and can do testing. With the scope tilted up I can just lay the mask over it for the test.
Robert
Thanks. I have a pier set up in my backyard and can do testing. With the scope tilted up I can just lay the mask over it for the test.
Robert
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68374
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Wade, AG Optical makes a f/6.7 12.5” imaging Dall-Dirkham, quartz optics, just north of 40 lbs but not collapsible. I have one all ready to jump on my Mach 2 when it arrives. 😉
Wayne
Wade, AG Optical makes a f/6.7 12.5” imaging Dall-Dirkham, quartz optics, just north of 40 lbs but not collapsible. I have one all ready to jump on my Mach 2 when it arrives. 😉
Wayne
|
By
Wayne Hixson
·
#68373
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Let's put it this way, I am not a good enough optician to make a really great RC. I know a couple of people who can, but don't ask the price. A 10" - 12" RC made by expert hands can easily run you
Let's put it this way, I am not a good enough optician to make a really great RC. I know a couple of people who can, but don't ask the price. A 10" - 12" RC made by expert hands can easily run you
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68372
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Well, sometimes I don't think things thru when i suggested tape over the edge of the mirror. That, of course is bad advise.
I may be wrong about what I am seeing in your bright stars, and it may
Well, sometimes I don't think things thru when i suggested tape over the edge of the mirror. That, of course is bad advise.
I may be wrong about what I am seeing in your bright stars, and it may
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68371
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Yes, would be a sweet scope, but isn't exactly cheap to make either. There would be intense competition from overseas manufacturers.
Rolando
Yes, would be a sweet scope, but isn't exactly cheap to make either. There would be intense competition from overseas manufacturers.
Rolando
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68370
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Thanks, Roland. You said what I suspected about RC and CDK but with the expertise that I can trust and really believe.
Greg
Thanks, Roland. You said what I suspected about RC and CDK but with the expertise that I can trust and really believe.
Greg
|
By
Greg Salyer
·
#68369
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Thanks for the optics lesson.
Thanks for the optics lesson.
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68368
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
How about something like a 12” F/6 corrected Dall-Kirkham, light weight and can be broken down for transport like your 17”?
How about something like a 12” F/6 corrected Dall-Kirkham, light weight and can be broken down for transport like your 17”?
|
By
W Hilmo
·
#68367
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Actually it is not a good idea to put any tape on the reflective surface. On the Lomo RC scopes they used a metal disc which was on standoffs that were attached to the rear cell. I would make a paper
Actually it is not a good idea to put any tape on the reflective surface. On the Lomo RC scopes they used a metal disc which was on standoffs that were attached to the rear cell. I would make a paper
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68366
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
RCs have two issues that prevent me from ever making them. Both primary and secondary have heavy aspheric surfaces that are extremely difficult to make smooth, and can potentially produce a lot of
RCs have two issues that prevent me from ever making them. Both primary and secondary have heavy aspheric surfaces that are extremely difficult to make smooth, and can potentially produce a lot of
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68365
·
|
|
Re: Pointing and Error Correction turning off in APCC when parking at custom park position
You would need to run it when unparking from the driver's custom park position. I can't tell you where that would be in ACP's script logic. You'll have to ask Bob Denny how/where to call the script if
You would need to run it when unparking from the driver's custom park position. I can't tell you where that would be in ACP's script logic. You'll have to ask Bob Denny how/where to call the script if
|
By
Ray Gralak
·
#68364
·
|
|
Re: Pointing and Error Correction turning off in APCC when parking at custom park position
Thanks very much for this Ray,
I'm just a little confused as to where this should be used in ACP?
As the pointing & tracking correction turn off everytime the mount is parked, the script would need to
Thanks very much for this Ray,
I'm just a little confused as to where this should be used in ACP?
As the pointing & tracking correction turn off everytime the mount is parked, the script would need to
|
By
David Trappett
·
#68363
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Thanks for the suggestions.
Thanks for the suggestions.
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68362
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
I wouldn't use tape. It's prone to turning out to be a mess, has a high chance of not being perfectly circular, and yea the adhesive could have an effect on the coating.
I would have a mask 3D
I wouldn't use tape. It's prone to turning out to be a mess, has a high chance of not being perfectly circular, and yea the adhesive could have an effect on the coating.
I would have a mask 3D
|
By
Dale Ghent
·
#68361
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
If I were to attempt to mask the edge what kind of tape can you use that wouldn’t harm the coatings?
Robert
If I were to attempt to mask the edge what kind of tape can you use that wouldn’t harm the coatings?
Robert
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68360
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Can you start making some smaller RC’s😀Thanks for the suggestion. One of the problems is how sensitive the CMOS cameras are. It is very easy to blow out stars. With my FSQ at f/5 I can’t shoot
Can you start making some smaller RC’s😀Thanks for the suggestion. One of the problems is how sensitive the CMOS cameras are. It is very easy to blow out stars. With my FSQ at f/5 I can’t shoot
|
By
Robert Chozick
·
#68359
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
I like the resolution on that Running Man image. Very nice.
Try masking down the outer 1/8 inch of the mirror, see if that reduces the spray of light around the brightest stars. If that works, think
I like the resolution on that Running Man image. Very nice.
Try masking down the outer 1/8 inch of the mirror, see if that reduces the spray of light around the brightest stars. If that works, think
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68358
·
|
|
Re: 1200GTO worm gear thrust washer?
Tighten it hand tight (do not apply too much pressure, we use between 10 and 15 inch-Lb.). Then add a drop of superglue on the outside of the threads.
If you ever need to loosen it for any reason, it
Tighten it hand tight (do not apply too much pressure, we use between 10 and 15 inch-Lb.). Then add a drop of superglue on the outside of the threads.
If you ever need to loosen it for any reason, it
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#68357
·
|
|
Re: Close up of M81 without CCDT67
Robert, these are both super shots but the Running Man is my favorite for sure.
Stuart Heggie
http://www.stuartheggie.com/
--
Stuart
http://www.astrofoto.ca/stuartheggie/
Robert, these are both super shots but the Running Man is my favorite for sure.
Stuart Heggie
http://www.stuartheggie.com/
--
Stuart
http://www.astrofoto.ca/stuartheggie/
|
By
Stuart <stuart.j.heggie@...>
·
#68356
·
|