Now ImageLink using TSX Camera Addon works. The problem is I have to input "Common Setting" for x-arcsec and y-arc-sec. Then I got success for plate solve. Thank you. POP ---In ap-gto@...,

Hi I run APPM and TSX as Administrator as you suggested. It works. I can connect to the camera. Then, I try to do platesolve using Image Link in "Plate Solve Setting" tab. Then I click "Image Link

I try to connect the camera using SkyX Camera Add-on in APPM Run tab. When I click Connect button, I got message below Fail to connect to Camera: Cannot create ActiveX component. And in "Plate Solve

I am a new in APCC Pro which I intend to use with AP1100AE. In the Run tab, I want to use TheSkyX Camera Add-on as a camera. And Use ImageLink for PlateSolver. I have license for TSX with Tpoint and

Windows XP is very mature. Should we just stop developing new OS's since XP is very mature? When 7 came out, way more people were using XP. XP was more stable, more mature, and had more users. I know

Yes, we have homing feature implemented in APCC for all mounts. Rolando

Hi Michael, every of that The reasoning is simple. ASCOM drivers for most of the major mounts have been refined and updated for 15 years. They have been used by thousands of users with hundreds of

Maybe this feature is already deprecated in face of APCC? Can someone from AP elaborate?

Dale, good be zero all. If they wanted I'm pretty one. And programmers are leaving LINUX for better waters, so you better hope that .Net Core helps. :-) Quoting: "Putting it in another way, the

Mike, no one is asking you to change. If ASCOM on Windows is what you have and what you like, then you should stick with it. It'll continue to be there for you and you can disregard everything else to

That's nice. I use vi as well. In fact, I use it pretty much exclusively except for times when TextMate on a Mac helps with dealing with someone's poorly-fomatted code. It's common (my emacs brethren

Hi Michael, OK, is there anything missing in the INDI driver that is in the ASCOM driver that you need help with? -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command

For your use case with your requirements I don't think you would benefit from changing anything. But there are use cases where your solution does not meet the requirements and for

I have a 900 CP 3 and also a new 1100 mount with CP 4....one for home observatory and the other for travel. I use the same hand controller for both so that means loading the PEC run appropriate for

The future you are projecting with cross-platform ASCOM would be very welcome as I always like to have multiple options. And it isn't too hard to write code to support multiple platforms -

producing GUI web and have a menu means PHP bindings to a Windows there is a An IDE isn't just used for developing GUI apps on Windows. Don't you use Eclipse on LINUX? (I have). There are many other

Gabe, I would say compared to a year ago the current INDI driver is on much better footing that before! If you have a spare machine or laptop I'd recommend giving it a shot. You

A lot of us don't depend on IDEs - a lot of us aren't even interested in producing GUI applications. If I want to make a CLI for a telescope control system, or a web interface, or anything like that -

Where the RA and Dec intersect. For dome geometry you need to be fairly precise so 'anywhere near the middle of the mount' may not cut it. On 2/20/2018 11:06 PM,

On our website under technical Support: http://www.astro-physics.com/tech_support/mounts/latitude-dimension-calc.xls