|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
I have left my AP900 98% of the year outside just covered in
Tarpoline. I only bring it in when a typhoon is coming! Never had a
problem with my mount. Although I don't have snow, I do get a lot
I have left my AP900 98% of the year outside just covered in
Tarpoline. I only bring it in when a typhoon is coming! Never had a
problem with my mount. Although I don't have snow, I do get a lot
|
By
Christopher Go
·
#21293
·
|
|
Re: Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
I've had my AP 1200 and RCOS 12.5 in a portable shelter for a few years. I haven't had an issue - other then heavy winds banging the shelter around. The system is fairly bombproof from the humidity
I've had my AP 1200 and RCOS 12.5 in a portable shelter for a few years. I haven't had an issue - other then heavy winds banging the shelter around. The system is fairly bombproof from the humidity
|
By
Klein, Adam <atk@...>
·
#21292
·
|
|
Leaving as GTO mount outdoors
I'm considering leaving my APO 1200 GTO outdoors over the winter, so that setup/knockdown time is lessened, and since I use it by remote control to image anyway. I'm in the Northeast, so we do get
I'm considering leaving my APO 1200 GTO outdoors over the winter, so that setup/knockdown time is lessened, and since I use it by remote control to image anyway. I'm in the Northeast, so we do get
|
By
Morgan Spangle <msfainc@...>
·
#21291
·
|
|
Can't connect AP600E GTO through ASCOM
Hi gang,
Sorry for any cross-posts from the ASCOM group, but here's my problem:
I've recently acquired a 600E GTO CP2 (D chip series) and cannot
connect to it through any ASCOM platforms. I used to
Hi gang,
Sorry for any cross-posts from the ASCOM group, but here's my problem:
I've recently acquired a 600E GTO CP2 (D chip series) and cannot
connect to it through any ASCOM platforms. I used to
|
By
Bob Benamati
·
#21290
·
|
|
Re: First Light with my new Mach1
Thanks Rick.
I have to confess, I have processed and re-processed this image until
I was happy with it. I got a new laptop at the same time and am
having a little trouble calibrating the screen.
Thanks Rick.
I have to confess, I have processed and re-processed this image until
I was happy with it. I got a new laptop at the same time and am
having a little trouble calibrating the screen.
|
By
hewholooks
·
#21289
·
|
|
Re: First Light with my new Mach1
Hi Hunter,
That is an impressive image. Great details and good color. I am
really impressed that this was done with a DSLR.
Thanks, Rick
be
shots
image
Hi Hunter,
That is an impressive image. Great details and good color. I am
really impressed that this was done with a DSLR.
Thanks, Rick
be
shots
image
|
By
Wiggins, Rick
·
#21287
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Hi Hunter,
I have a few questions if you don't mind.
Maybe I am having a senior moment, but what is PHD?
Antoher question or confirmation is "Is aggressiveness set to 60 "
equivalent to 60% correction
Hi Hunter,
I have a few questions if you don't mind.
Maybe I am having a senior moment, but what is PHD?
Antoher question or confirmation is "Is aggressiveness set to 60 "
equivalent to 60% correction
|
By
Wiggins, Rick
·
#21286
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
rickwiggins@... writes:
You will always have some drift in both axes, even with perfect polar
alignment. Unless you are pointing straight up, the stars do not move at exactly the
rickwiggins@... writes:
You will always have some drift in both axes, even with perfect polar
alignment. Unless you are pointing straight up, the stars do not move at exactly the
|
By
Roland Christen
·
#21288
·
|
|
The New Mount
'Afternoon,
Just got out in the sun today and got some documentary shots of the new
mount. I thought I would share it here, so you nice folks could see
'Afternoon,
Just got out in the sun today and got some documentary shots of the new
mount. I thought I would share it here, so you nice folks could see
|
By
hewholooks
·
#21285
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Bob,
The results with the little Orion SSAG and the AP900 are so good that of course all it has done is to show up faults elsewhere in my system. Ten minute exposures have produced tack-sharp stars -
Bob,
The results with the little Orion SSAG and the AP900 are so good that of course all it has done is to show up faults elsewhere in my system. Ten minute exposures have produced tack-sharp stars -
|
By
Woodwind
·
#21283
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Yes.
It is mostly unreadable with text and images piled one on top of another.
dan
___
"William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@...> wrote: dan kowall wrote:
Dan,
The
Yes.
It is mostly unreadable with text and images piled one on top of another.
dan
___
"William R. Mattil" <wrmattil@...> wrote: dan kowall wrote:
Dan,
The
|
By
dan kowall
·
#21284
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
I'm at 1680 x 1050 (Apple Cinema).
The overwriting occurs at all font sizes.
I'm a novice at html (actually below novice if that's possible), but the source code at Starfish shows a lot of absolute
I'm at 1680 x 1050 (Apple Cinema).
The overwriting occurs at all font sizes.
I'm a novice at html (actually below novice if that's possible), but the source code at Starfish shows a lot of absolute
|
By
dan kowall
·
#21282
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Bob Piatek <bobtek@...> wrote:
Displays fine here, IE7 and Vista, 1900x1200.
"Full text available to premium subscribers only"
Paul Gustafson
Bob Piatek <bobtek@...> wrote:
Displays fine here, IE7 and Vista, 1900x1200.
"Full text available to premium subscribers only"
Paul Gustafson
|
By
Paul Gustafson
·
#21281
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Alan,
No problem here - I'm using IE7 @ 1280 x 800 and 96 dpi. The links display correctly.
You may have to change screen settings, if there is overlap. Some websites have this kind of problem - e.g.
Alan,
No problem here - I'm using IE7 @ 1280 x 800 and 96 dpi. The links display correctly.
You may have to change screen settings, if there is overlap. Some websites have this kind of problem - e.g.
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#21280
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
The site was fine by me running a vista and firefox set-up.
Murray
Bob Piatek <bobtek@...> wrote: Well, the WEB page being messed up is puzzling. I've tested with
The site was fine by me running a vista and firefox set-up.
Murray
Bob Piatek <bobtek@...> wrote: Well, the WEB page being messed up is puzzling. I've tested with
|
By
Woodwind
·
#21279
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Well, the WEB page being messed up is puzzling. I've tested with IE, Firefox, and Safari and it looks good on my system. I presume this means it is not a browser related issue.
Maybe differences
Well, the WEB page being messed up is puzzling. I've tested with IE, Firefox, and Safari and it looks good on my system. I presume this means it is not a browser related issue.
Maybe differences
|
By
Bob
·
#21278
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
In a message dated 03/31/08 13:38:40 Central Daylight Time, mphammick@... writes:
Would not the the best of both worlds be a system that allows you to select both the exposure time and the
In a message dated 03/31/08 13:38:40 Central Daylight Time, mphammick@... writes:
Would not the the best of both worlds be a system that allows you to select both the exposure time and the
|
By
Kent Kirkley
·
#21275
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
dan kowall wrote:
Dan,
The following page ?
http://www.fishcamp.com/starfish_shootout.html
Regards
Bill
dan kowall wrote:
Dan,
The following page ?
http://www.fishcamp.com/starfish_shootout.html
Regards
Bill
|
By
William R. Mattil <wrmattil@...>
·
#21274
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
Dan, Alan, Bob,
FYI, I don't have any problems with the Fishcamp website, either with
Firefox (2.0.0.13) nor with IE 6.0.2900.xxxx on an IBM Thinkpad T43 Laptop
running XP 1024x768...all pretty much
Dan, Alan, Bob,
FYI, I don't have any problems with the Fishcamp website, either with
Firefox (2.0.0.13) nor with IE 6.0.2900.xxxx on an IBM Thinkpad T43 Laptop
running XP 1024x768...all pretty much
|
By
Hank Sielski
·
#21276
·
|
|
Re: Autoguider correction frequency
I've seen these problems before and it had to do with screen resolution. Try
maybe 1024x768. On my monitors at the suggested max 1680x1050, all is well.
Are you using normal font size or larger?
I've seen these problems before and it had to do with screen resolution. Try
maybe 1024x768. On my monitors at the suggested max 1680x1050, all is well.
Are you using normal font size or larger?
|
By
Steve Reilly <sreilly@...>
·
#21277
·
|