|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
Joseph Zeglinski wrote:
How could S&T make this announcement if they were not aware of it ? Sheesh. There are plenty of things to flame them for so that we need not resort to making things
Joseph Zeglinski wrote:
How could S&T make this announcement if they were not aware of it ? Sheesh. There are plenty of things to flame them for so that we need not resort to making things
|
By
William R. Mattil <wrmattil@...>
·
#19576
·
|
|
Re: GTO Keypad Firmware
Hi Larry,
We are planning to finish up the 4.2 keypad code soon, then will
release it to the beta group. After beta, we will have it available
on our website for downloading.
Marj
Hi Larry,
We are planning to finish up the 4.2 keypad code soon, then will
release it to the beta group. After beta, we will have it available
on our website for downloading.
Marj
|
By
Marj Christen
·
#19575
·
|
|
Anybody have an AP 10 pound weight they will part with?
Please respond off list.
Thanks
Tom
Sings with the Stars
Please respond off list.
Thanks
Tom
Sings with the Stars
|
By
tucstargzr
·
#19574
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
Dean,
One final S&T criticism before I stop (my off topic rant).
I too complained to the editor that it was really dumb on the part of their
new owners, to make the magazine changes in mid year.
Dean,
One final S&T criticism before I stop (my off topic rant).
I too complained to the editor that it was really dumb on the part of their
new owners, to make the magazine changes in mid year.
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#19572
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
I e-mail and raised all sorts of fuss when my first issue came with the
cheaper binding. Really cheapens the magazine, and like you said, not
having the spline means we can't easily reference older
I e-mail and raised all sorts of fuss when my first issue came with the
cheaper binding. Really cheapens the magazine, and like you said, not
having the spline means we can't easily reference older
|
By
Dean S
·
#19571
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007 OT
Yeah, I remember in 1979 being outraged that a new Jeep 4x4 cost $10K.
Greg
Yeah, I remember in 1979 being outraged that a new Jeep 4x4 cost $10K.
Greg
|
By
Gregory Nottingham <gnpnotti@...>
·
#19598
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
Hi Dean,
That is one thing that has always really bugged me about S&T magazine -
now, recently another, that they have gone back to stapling, and you can't
find an old issue since there is no
Hi Dean,
That is one thing that has always really bugged me about S&T magazine -
now, recently another, that they have gone back to stapling, and you can't
find an old issue since there is no
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#19569
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
Magazine dates make about as much sense as buying 2008 model cars in 2007???
Magazine dates make about as much sense as buying 2008 model cars in 2007???
|
By
Dean S
·
#19568
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
Your December issue is the one that should have just arrived. The
November issue has been out for a month.
Larry
Your December issue is the one that should have just arrived. The
November issue has been out for a month.
Larry
|
By
Larry Phillips
·
#19567
·
|
|
Re: TEC 140 + 14" LX200R on an AP1200
Gavin --
I have a Losmandy dovetail attached to the top of my Parallax rings
holding a Meade 16" LX200GPS OTA. On the rail rides a Tak FC-100.
The FC-100 is a doublet, and considerably smaller
Gavin --
I have a Losmandy dovetail attached to the top of my Parallax rings
holding a Meade 16" LX200GPS OTA. On the rail rides a Tak FC-100.
The FC-100 is a doublet, and considerably smaller
|
By
Jeff Young <jey@...>
·
#19566
·
|
|
Re: TEC 140 + 14" LX200R on an AP1200
Gavin Bray wrote:
It is certainly feasible. Many others have done exactly that and it's doubtful that you'd be getting anywhere near the capacity of your AP1200.
Just don't be too surprised if you
Gavin Bray wrote:
It is certainly feasible. Many others have done exactly that and it's doubtful that you'd be getting anywhere near the capacity of your AP1200.
Just don't be too surprised if you
|
By
William R. Mattil <wrmattil@...>
·
#19565
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
In a message dated 11/1/2007 11:44:35 AM Central Daylight Time,
J.Zeglinski@... writes:
Back to topic - I am surprised that S&T didn't scoop the astro publishing
world with such a major
In a message dated 11/1/2007 11:44:35 AM Central Daylight Time,
J.Zeglinski@... writes:
Back to topic - I am surprised that S&T didn't scoop the astro publishing
world with such a major
|
By
Kent Kirkley
·
#19573
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
The Mach 1 is reviewed in New Products in the Dec. issue, page 37, entitled "Staying on Track" ...
A good read ....
Dave
The Mach 1 is reviewed in New Products in the Dec. issue, page 37, entitled "Staying on Track" ...
A good read ....
Dave
|
By
Dr. David Toth
·
#19564
·
|
|
TEC 140 + 14" LX200R on an AP1200
Hello
I have a 14" LX200R attached to an AP1200 using a set of Parallax
Instruments rings. The setup is housed in my observatory and I'm very
happy with it.
I was wondering whether I could attach a
Hello
I have a 14" LX200R attached to an AP1200 using a set of Parallax
Instruments rings. The setup is housed in my observatory and I'm very
happy with it.
I was wondering whether I could attach a
|
By
Gavin Bray
·
#19563
·
|
|
Re: Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007 OT
In a message dated 11/1/2007 9:59:36 AM Central Daylight Time,
J.Zeglinski@... writes:
Does any other monthly magazine publish months in advance?
For me, it's more annoying than supposedly
In a message dated 11/1/2007 9:59:36 AM Central Daylight Time,
J.Zeglinski@... writes:
Does any other monthly magazine publish months in advance?
For me, it's more annoying than supposedly
|
By
Kent Kirkley
·
#19570
·
|
|
Mach1 critique in S&T Dec 2007
The Nov issue of S&T has just arrived and the "next month's contents"
does not mention it. Likewise the contents list for the Dec issue of
Sky &Telescope, vol 114, No 6 on the "www.skypub.com"
The Nov issue of S&T has just arrived and the "next month's contents"
does not mention it. Likewise the contents list for the Dec issue of
Sky &Telescope, vol 114, No 6 on the "www.skypub.com"
|
By
Gerald Sargent <sargentg@...>
·
#19562
·
|
|
Re: portable pier height for 1200GTO
Hi Dean,
I have the 48" port. pier that I use when I go to my ranch. My
imaging scope is either my TOA 130 or the FSQ. Check out my web
site.
www.astrodave.com/oharra
Tom O'Harra
about the
Hi Dean,
I have the 48" port. pier that I use when I go to my ranch. My
imaging scope is either my TOA 130 or the FSQ. Check out my web
site.
www.astrodave.com/oharra
Tom O'Harra
about the
|
By
tomoharra <toharra@...>
·
#19561
·
|
|
Re: Pier design and sand
Hi Joe,
I come from the school of thought in astrophotography that there is
no substitude for stiffness, like in auto racing there's no
substitute for cubic inches. A lot of ideas for astro
Hi Joe,
I come from the school of thought in astrophotography that there is
no substitude for stiffness, like in auto racing there's no
substitute for cubic inches. A lot of ideas for astro
|
By
dmwmpd <westergren@...>
·
#19560
·
|
|
Re: Pier design and sand
Hi Don,
My engineering background reminds me of these pitfalls as well, and it is
a concern at the back of my mind, but I still wonder how much stiffness in
this application, is really enough.
Hi Don,
My engineering background reminds me of these pitfalls as well, and it is
a concern at the back of my mind, but I still wonder how much stiffness in
this application, is really enough.
|
By
Joe Zeglinski
·
#19559
·
|
|
Re: Pier design and sand
Hi Joe,
I really don't think PVC pipe buried in the soil is going to be a
very good pier. The ringing that you mention is a high frequency
tone, that the PVC pipe wouldn't have compared to a metal
Hi Joe,
I really don't think PVC pipe buried in the soil is going to be a
very good pier. The ringing that you mention is a high frequency
tone, that the PVC pipe wouldn't have compared to a metal
|
By
dmwmpd <westergren@...>
·
#19558
·
|