Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Hi Peter,
> I entered them in the ASCOM driver. Finally I rechecked that driver and they were there.
If you are using APCC with the ASCOM driver, then APCC will initialize the mount. So, the place you should set up the lat/long coordinates is in the Sites dialog in APCC. Here's a screenshot:
-Ray
|
|
Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Los Osos
35° 18' 36.54'' N
120° 49' 31.5804'' W I entered them in the ASCOM driver. Finally I rechecked that driver and they were there.
|
|
Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Where did you enter your lat/lon numbers?
I did manually enter the lat and longitude, and also powered the mount off several times and restarted APCC. The problem persisted. It mostly affected the DEC axis, but once the RA also did not correct. The cables look good, as usual. No other obvious problems. I will not be able to try again until I return from vacation in 3 weeks. What else do you suggest? I send an email to George.
|
|
Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
I did manually enter the lat and longitude, and also powered the mount off several times and restarted APCC. The problem persisted. It mostly affected the DEC axis, but once the RA also did not correct. The cables look good, as usual. No other obvious problems. I will not be able to try again until I return from vacation in 3 weeks. What else do you suggest? I send an email to George.
I made a previous post about PHD not being able to make DEC corrections, but assumed that was a problem with the guide star.
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
KHursh
The 'HOME' button does not exist on a mount without AE. It is on the AE tab of APCC pro.
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Horia
Hi Bill,
>> Home would work even with the mount lost.
does this also apply to a mount without absolute encoders?
Kind Regards, Horia
Von: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Im Auftrag von Bill Long
Park does not clear the recal/sync. Home does. A lost mount would not return to park 3 correctly via a park command. Home would work even with the mount lost. Once it returned home and cleared the errant recal/sync the mount is no longer lost. Major difference.
If you were to recal or sync the mount on a known star the 3D model would display correctly.
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Bill Long
Should add that it is time for a new CDK14. Gotta test the maximum out!
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Bill Long <bill@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:33 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Looks like its performing nicely and is only limited by the seeing conditions you have there. A 540mm FL scope is small and light so I doubt the 1100 even knew it was on the mount at all.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:10 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions I’m still not sure I understand the fine points here, but thought I would share this. It was unexpectedly clear all night (hazy but image-able), so the new mount got its first light (if that can apply to mounts).
It started at 0.30” which was the worst all night, by the morning it was guiding at 0.22” (at 540mm image/guide focal length (OAG)).
So the mount understands even if I don’t. 😊
Happy round stars. Happy sleep deprived user.
AP, you folks build well!
Linwood
_,_
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Bill Long
Looks like its performing nicely and is only limited by the seeing conditions you have there. A 540mm FL scope is small and light so I doubt the 1100 even knew it was on the mount at all.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 4:10 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions I’m still not sure I understand the fine points here, but thought I would share this. It was unexpectedly clear all night (hazy but image-able), so the new mount got its first light (if that can apply to mounts).
It started at 0.30” which was the worst all night, by the morning it was guiding at 0.22” (at 540mm image/guide focal length (OAG)).
So the mount understands even if I don’t. 😊
Happy round stars. Happy sleep deprived user.
AP, you folks build well!
Linwood
_,_
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
ap@CaptivePhotons.com
I’m still not sure I understand the fine points here, but thought I would share this. It was unexpectedly clear all night (hazy but image-able), so the new mount got its first light (if that can apply to mounts).
It started at 0.30” which was the worst all night, by the morning it was guiding at 0.22” (at 540mm image/guide focal length (OAG)).
So the mount understands even if I don’t. 😊
Happy round stars. Happy sleep deprived user.
AP, you folks build well!
Linwood
_,_
|
|
Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Bill is correct. Not only that, both Latitude and Longitude are incorrectly set to 0 at one point:
0000050 2021-08-01 00:40:54.250: Debug, Command Thread, TX = ':Gt#' 0000051 2021-08-01 00:40:54.250: Debug, UDP Send, --> :Gt# Timeout(msecs)= 100 0000052 2021-08-01 00:40:54.252: Debug, UDPReply, <-- +00*00:00# (1 msecs) 0000053 2021-08-01 00:40:54.252: Debug, Command Thread, TX=':Gt#'|RX='+00*00:00#' 0000054 2021-08-01 00:40:54.253: Debug, Command Thread, TX = ':Gg#' 0000055 2021-08-01 00:40:54.253: Debug, UDP Send, --> :Gg# Timeout(msecs)= 100 0000056 2021-08-01 00:40:54.255: Debug, UDPReply, <-- +00*00:00# (2 msecs) 0000057 2021-08-01 00:40:54.255: Debug, Command Thread, TX=':Gg#'|RX='+00*00:00#'
Power off the mount if it is not off already. Then power on the mount and run APCC . Watch APCC to make sure that it initializes the mount with the proper Lat/Long values. If something else initializes the mount first (e.g. the keypad?) you will not see APCC’s popup initialization window, and APCC will not set the mount’s latitude and longitude. You can check thevalues set in the mount on APCC’s Site tab.
-Ray
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Bill Long
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 2:14 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Not sure this is causing your problem, but this warning entry is all over the place in the log:
Is your site information correct? If not, update it and reboot the mount and try again.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Peter Bresler via groups.io <PABresler@...>
Plate solve corrections generated by SGP are not being made by my 1200. The plate solve may work as a blind solve or direct solve by PS2, the error is shown, but on the next try there is no change in the error. I tried a couple of different computers, thinking there might be some problem with the settings.
|
|
Re: 1200 not taking SGP corrections
Bill Long
Not sure this is causing your problem, but this warning entry is all over the place in the log:
Is your site information correct? If not, update it and reboot the mount and try again.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of Peter Bresler via groups.io <PABresler@...>
Sent: Sunday, August 1, 2021 2:01 AM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Subject: [ap-gto] 1200 not taking SGP corrections Plate solve corrections generated by SGP are not being made by my 1200. The plate solve may work as a blind solve or direct solve by PS2, the error is shown, but on the next try there is no change in the error. I tried a couple of different computers,
thinking there might be some problem with the settings.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/v2simav8cflq749/ApccZip-Peter_Bresler-2021-08-01-011435.zip?dl=0
|
|
1200 not taking SGP corrections
Plate solve corrections generated by SGP are not being made by my 1200. The plate solve may work as a blind solve or direct solve by PS2, the error is shown, but on the next try there is no change in the error. I tried a couple of different computers, thinking there might be some problem with the settings.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/v2simav8cflq749/ApccZip-Peter_Bresler-2021-08-01-011435.zip?dl=0
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
ap@CaptivePhotons.com
@Wade:
> I hope that this makes sense,
Very helpful. Thank you.
Linwood
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
W Hilmo
My suggestion is to regard “find home” as a recovery tool.
In about 10 years of using Astro-Physics mounts, I’ve never actually used the “find home” feature. In my normal workflow, I have my automation set to park the mount in Park 4 at the end of a session. If I am going to remove the OTA, I manually park it at Park 3. And as Roland says, there’s no need to park the mount at all. Just power it down when you are done. I have my mounts configured to unpark from “last parked”, so when I want to star a session, I just turn them on and go.
I have had a handful of cases in that time where I managed to get a mount lost. It was never in a normal workflow. Most of the time, it was when I was experimenting with some unreleased mount control software. Since I’m not a remote imager, I just recovered the mount manually, although “find home” would have worked as well.
I also never loosen the clutches, unless I’m recovering from a lost situation.
Regarding sync versus recalibrate, recalibrate is your friend. Recalibrate works like a sync on most other mounts. Essentially, it says “forget where you think you are pointed, you are pointed here.” Sync is similar, but adds one more nuance. Specifically, sync is just like a recal, but in addition to saying “you are here”, it also says “and the counterweights are down”. It’s not immediately obvious why you would want to tell the mount whether the counterweights are up or down. The reason is that, for any position in the sky, there are two ways that the mount can point there. One way is what we usually see, with the telescope above the mount and counterweights below. But you can also point at any position in the sky with the counterweights above the mount and the telescope below. An Astro-Physics mount is very flexible, and will point with the counterweights up if you want it to. The purpose of a sync, as opposed to a recal, is so to tell the mount that the counterweights are down. The gotcha here is that if you are pointed near the meridian, the counterweight shaft is nearly parallel to the ground. If you are not careful, and do a sync near the meridian, you might accidentally do the sync with the counterweights imperceptibly up. When that happens, the mount will always slew with the counterweights up and scope down.
My suggestion is to avoid doing a sync, ever. The exception is if you are recovering from being lost. I can’t remember the last time I did a sync. The ASCOM driver has a feature to convert “sync” commands to “recal”. The feature is enabled by default, and you should probably never disable it.
I hope that this makes sense, -Wade
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> On Behalf Of ap@...
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 5:16 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Thanks.
@Roland said:
Thanks, I understood that. I want to park because it’s an easier load/unload point to disassemble the OTA. Also, Park 2 will be less likely to accumulate rain or dew if it parks due to some failure while imaging and I’m asleep.
See that’s where I am confused. The mount and APCC seem to think it is right (or close). I fired up Pempro (I’m still in daylight) and started the polar align, which goes to 5 west of meridian at dec 0. The mount slewed to what looked like that position exactly. The Telescope Position in APCC showed the red dot in the right place. Wouldn’t a sync actually just refine this from a plate solve? The 3D model is almost upside down, it’s not off a few degrees . Or is it just plain completely wrong until at least one sync is done?
Can I impose also: Sync vs Recal?
Linwood
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
ap@CaptivePhotons.com
Thanks.
@Roland said:
Thanks, I understood that. I want to park because it’s an easier load/unload point to disassemble the OTA. Also, Park 2 will be less likely to accumulate rain or dew if it parks due to some failure while imaging and I’m asleep.
See that’s where I am confused. The mount and APCC seem to think it is right (or close). I fired up Pempro (I’m still in daylight) and started the polar align, which goes to 5 west of meridian at dec 0. The mount slewed to what looked like that position exactly. The Telescope Position in APCC showed the red dot in the right place. Wouldn’t a sync actually just refine this from a plate solve? The 3D model is almost upside down, it’s not off a few degrees . Or is it just plain completely wrong until at least one sync is done?
Can I impose also: Sync vs Recal?
Linwood
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
W Hilmo
I believe that the “known parking positions” are all based on how the mount thinks it’s oriented with respect to the sky. I believe that the “find home” will position the mount relative to a known axis position, independent of the sky. With an encoder mount like your AE, “find home” will use the encoders and will be very, very accurate. It will also recalibrate the mount so that it knows where it’s pointed with respect to the sky.
The implications here are that if you do an errant recalibrate or sync, the known park positions will no longer be correct. The find home feature is intended to recover from that.
Regarding the clutches, if you have an AP1100AE or AP1600AE, then releasing the clutches and moving the mount will be something that the encoders don’t “see”, so you will need to re-establish the home position if you do that. With a Mach2, I believe that the encoders are always correct, even if you release the clutches and move the mount, so there is never a need to re-establish the home position.
I hope that makes sense, -Wade
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> On Behalf Of ap@...
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 4:56 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
@Roland said:
OK. I did that. I can see that it sort of worked (3D is still wacky), but… is it just a more convenient form of Park/unPark?
I.e. if I park-3 it, make sure it is in that orientation, and unpack – is that any different?
Or is one gross using just human alignment (i.e. if I am placing it there) and the other uses the encoders?
This isn’t keeping me from making it all work, it seems to just do the right thing with what I have done so far. I just am trying to understand all the tools and settings.
Oh… any reason why 3D is hosed? I unparked from Park-2 a bit ago, I can visually see the scope is still pointing basically due east at the horizon (tracking for a few minutes). The A/A on the position seems to agree. Why is the 3D model so wrong?
Linwood
PS. About 60% overcast but I have it set up and leveled and waiting for dark to give it the first run. Hoping I get a few stars. Attachments:
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Bill Long
Park does not clear the recal/sync. Home does. A lost mount would not return to park 3 correctly via a park command. Home would work even with the mount lost. Once it returned home and cleared the errant recal/sync the mount is no longer lost. Major difference.
If you were to recal or sync the mount on a known star the 3D model would display correctly.
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of ap@... <ap@...>
Sent: Saturday, July 31, 2021 4:56 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions @Roland said:
OK. I did that. I can see that it sort of worked (3D is still wacky), but… is it just a more convenient form of Park/unPark?
I.e. if I park-3 it, make sure it is in that orientation, and unpack – is that any different?
Or is one gross using just human alignment (i.e. if I am placing it there) and the other uses the encoders?
This isn’t keeping me from making it all work, it seems to just do the right thing with what I have done so far. I just am trying to understand all the tools and settings.
Oh… any reason why 3D is hosed? I unparked from Park-2 a bit ago, I can visually see the scope is still pointing basically due east at the horizon (tracking for a few minutes). The A/A on the position seems to agree. Why is the 3D model so wrong?
Linwood
PS. About 60% overcast but I have it set up and leveled and waiting for dark to give it the first run. Hoping I get a few stars.
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Roland Christen
Homing is an effective tool for remote operation. Of course if you are there next to the mount you can fix any anomaly like a wrong sync by simply moving the mount manually to your favorite park position and then starting the next session from that park position. Homing is not needed if you do that. Remote operation is not hands-on and needs a way to home if the mount is lost.
You actually do not ever need to park the mount. You can turn the power off any place in the sky. When you resume the next session, the mount will know exactly where it is because the encoders are absolute (as long as the clutches are never moved because the encoders on the 1100 are not attached to the clutches). Simply unpark the mount from its present position. I do this all the time and most often never really park the mount.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: ap@... <ap@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Sent: Sat, Jul 31, 2021 6:56 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions @Roland said:
OK. I did that. I can see that it sort of worked (3D is still wacky), but… is it just a more convenient form of Park/unPark?
I.e. if I park-3 it, make sure it is in that orientation, and unpack – is that any different?
Or is one gross using just human alignment (i.e. if I am placing it there) and the other uses the encoders?
This isn’t keeping me from making it all work, it seems to just do the right thing with what I have done so far. I just am trying to understand all the tools and settings.
Oh… any reason why 3D is hosed? I unparked from Park-2 a bit ago, I can visually see the scope is still pointing basically due east at the horizon (tracking for a few minutes). The A/A on the position seems to agree. Why is the 3D model
so wrong?
Linwood
PS. About 60% overcast but I have it set up and leveled and waiting for dark to give it the first run. Hoping I get a few stars.
-- Roland Christen Astro-Physics
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
ap@CaptivePhotons.com
@Roland said:
OK. I did that. I can see that it sort of worked (3D is still wacky), but… is it just a more convenient form of Park/unPark?
I.e. if I park-3 it, make sure it is in that orientation, and unpack – is that any different?
Or is one gross using just human alignment (i.e. if I am placing it there) and the other uses the encoders?
This isn’t keeping me from making it all work, it seems to just do the right thing with what I have done so far. I just am trying to understand all the tools and settings.
Oh… any reason why 3D is hosed? I unparked from Park-2 a bit ago, I can visually see the scope is still pointing basically due east at the horizon (tracking for a few minutes). The A/A on the position seems to agree. Why is the 3D model so wrong?
Linwood
PS. About 60% overcast but I have it set up and leveled and waiting for dark to give it the first run. Hoping I get a few stars.
|
|
Re: New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
Roland Christen
How is that different from just parking to a known park position and unparking? Unparking does not recalibrate the mount. Homing recalibrates the mount and clears your errant syncs/recals so that the mount is not permanently lost. Parking it won't do that. In fact, if your sync is off by 3 hours in RA, then all parks will also e off by 3 hours. Home, on the other hand will be dead nuts on.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: ap@... <ap@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Sent: Sat, Jul 31, 2021 4:45 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] New AP1100, indoor practice, lots of little questions
How is that different from just parking to a known park position and unparking?
So my main reason for getting encoders was to better battle wind – during dry season here, it is often more windy, and I was losing lots of subs as the wind went from, say, 3mph to 8mph. I know there’s no complete solution for wind, but
I understood AE’s would help a lot. Hope that’s true?
OK. Agreed. But does that affect how they work for wind?
I don’t understand how the mount can slew to the right position in the sky (in daylight, so “right” here means “by eye right direction”) but the 3D model shows it grossly off, maybe even upside down type wrong. The good news is the mount
is right, I just don’t know where I’m going wrong to confuse the 3D model.
When I say “slew to the right position” I mean I use NINA, pick a star that’s high in daylight, and do a slew. The mount looks like it is in the right position and pointing to where the star would be. Clearly it has not been sync’d to
a plate solve.
Linwood
-- Roland Christen Astro-Physics
|
|