Date   

Re: Question about meridian limits

Horia
 

If you have one AP1100 carrying the two imaging systems, you only need meridian limits on one computer – the one controlling the mount. The other computer would have no idea what to do with those limits.

 

Kind regards,

Horia

 

 

Von: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> Im Auftrag von Rick Darden
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 16. Juni 2021 00:52
An: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Betreff: [ap-gto] Question about meridian limits

 

Hi All,

I have 2 independent imaging systems on my AP110AE that have their own independent computers. I did this because I have imagers from the same mfg on both systems and was having serious driver issues using 1 computer for both. I use APCC Pro. I am going to set up a median limit map. Can I create the map on 1 system and then copy the file to the second computer?


Sync with The Sky 6 Pro

Astrobob
 

Hi All,

 

I’m having problems with my AP1200. The CP3 is updated. I have a large model that suddenly won’t sync. Tonight, after I slew to Vega it was off by several degrees so I centered it with the hand pad and  did a resync. Then when I went to Deneb and that was way off. So I parked the mount and found it pointing in the wrong direction on both axis. Then I releveled the mount and with the Sky6Pro slew to Vega and once again was off by several degrees. I’m running in circles. I’m sure I’m missing some step somewhere…

 

Bob

 

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

 


Question about meridian limits

Rick Darden
 

Hi All,

I have 2 independent imaging systems on my AP110AE that have their own independent computers. I did this because I have imagers from the same mfg on both systems and was having serious driver issues using 1 computer for both. I use APCC Pro. I am going to set up a median limit map. Can I create the map on 1 system and then copy the file to the second computer?


Re: Models #APCC

Worsel
 

It's time we stopped Continental drift...


Bryan


Re: Models #APCC

KHursh
 

Thanks Ray. I will give that a try


Re: Models #APCC

Ray Gralak
 

Hi Kevin,

I have a pretty big model in APPM and I am semi-permanently mounted. I have the Mach2 on a Losmandy HD
tripod on concrete blocks. My dirt/lawn is largely clay, so even though I am well polar aligned, it drifts often due to
the soil shrinking when it gets dry. So my question is, while there have been no other changes to my set-up, the
altitude of my PA does change, so is my model now useless? Thanks in advance.
I have the same type of soil. Small shifts in polar alignment will primarily affect all-sky pointing accuracy. You can recover all-sky pointing accuracy by refining your polar alignment, leaving everything else the same.

-Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of KHursh via groups.io
Sent: Monday, June 14, 2021 7:43 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: [ap-gto] Models #APCC

I have a pretty big model in APPM and I am semi-permanently mounted. I have the Mach2 on a Losmandy HD
tripod on concrete blocks. My dirt/lawn is largely clay, so even though I am well polar aligned, it drifts often due to
the soil shrinking when it gets dry. So my question is, while there have been no other changes to my set-up, the
altitude of my PA does change, so is my model now useless? Thanks in advance.

Kevin


Re: Models #APCC

KHursh
 

That's funny. No. More than zero?


Re: Models #APCC

Roland Christen
 

Have you measured the drift due to soil motion?

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: KHursh via groups.io <khursh@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Mon, Jun 14, 2021 9:42 pm
Subject: [ap-gto] Models #APCC

I have a pretty big model in APPM and I am semi-permanently mounted. I have the Mach2 on a Losmandy HD tripod on concrete blocks. My dirt/lawn is largely clay, so even though I am well polar aligned, it drifts often due to the soil shrinking when it gets dry. So my question is, while there have been no other changes to my set-up, the altitude of my PA does change, so is my model now useless? Thanks in advance.

Kevin

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Models #APCC

KHursh
 

I have a pretty big model in APPM and I am semi-permanently mounted. I have the Mach2 on a Losmandy HD tripod on concrete blocks. My dirt/lawn is largely clay, so even though I am well polar aligned, it drifts often due to the soil shrinking when it gets dry. So my question is, while there have been no other changes to my set-up, the altitude of my PA does change, so is my model now useless? Thanks in advance.

Kevin


Re: Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Shane Ramotowski
 

Thanks Roland.  This is 1/4th the volume that my AP1200 takes in transit!

- Shane

On 6/14/2021 10:01 AM, Roland Christen via groups.io wrote:
Very clever.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Ramotowski <kor@cotse.net>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Sun, Jun 13, 2021 11:08 am
Subject: [ap-gto] Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Hi all!

My Mach2 is finally portable!  I bought a Pelican 1560 case and adapted
it to securely hold the Mach2 during transport.

See:
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican.jpg <http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican.jpg>>
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican_empty.jpg <http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican_empty.jpg>>

The frame is 3/4 inch plywood lined with 5mm neoprene wherever it is in
contact with the mount.  The Mach2 fits (almost too) snugly and does not
move at all when in the case.  The black area on the lid contacts the
mount on the RA axis to keep it from moving in the out-of-the-case
direction when the lid is closed.  The frame is attached to the bottom
of the case by 4 L brackets and to the front and back with 4 bolts each
through the side of the case, a plastic wedge and the frame itself.  The
frame does not move in the case and the Mach2 does not move in the frame.

You can see the white plastic wedge and bolts here:
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/pelican_bolts.jpg <http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/pelican_bolts.jpg>>

I have to take the saddle off and drop the altitude all the way to fit
it in, but it's OK as the mount it only takes a minute to put the saddle
back on and only about 3 minutes to polar align, which I would have to
do anyway, since I just moved the mount.  I'm going to store the saddle
in the area to the right of the mount in a pouch.

Ready for a Star Party!

- Shane

--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@cotse.net <mailto:kor@cotse.net>
https://www.kor-astro.net <https://www.kor-astro.net/>







--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics
--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@cotse.net
https://www.kor-astro.net


Re: Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Shane Ramotowski
 

Yeah, but only if they are really light weight--I won't be putting the counterweight bar in there!  It's already pushing 60 lbs with the Mach2, case, and wood frame...

- Shane

On 6/14/2021 7:22 AM, M Hambrick wrote:
Very nice Shane

There is even room in there for a few other accessories.

Mike
--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@cotse.net
https://www.kor-astro.net


Re: Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Roland Christen
 

Very clever.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: Shane Ramotowski <kor@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Sun, Jun 13, 2021 11:08 am
Subject: [ap-gto] Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Hi all!

My Mach2 is finally portable!  I bought a Pelican 1560 case and adapted
it to securely hold the Mach2 during transport.

See:

The frame is 3/4 inch plywood lined with 5mm neoprene wherever it is in
contact with the mount.  The Mach2 fits (almost too) snugly and does not
move at all when in the case.  The black area on the lid contacts the
mount on the RA axis to keep it from moving in the out-of-the-case
direction when the lid is closed.  The frame is attached to the bottom
of the case by 4 L brackets and to the front and back with 4 bolts each
through the side of the case, a plastic wedge and the frame itself.  The
frame does not move in the case and the Mach2 does not move in the frame.

You can see the white plastic wedge and bolts here:

I have to take the saddle off and drop the altitude all the way to fit
it in, but it's OK as the mount it only takes a minute to put the saddle
back on and only about 3 minutes to polar align, which I would have to
do anyway, since I just moved the mount.  I'm going to store the saddle
in the area to the right of the mount in a pouch.

Ready for a Star Party!

- Shane

--
Shane Ramotowski







--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: Mach2 in a Pelican Case

M Hambrick
 

Very nice Shane

There is even room in there for a few other accessories.

Mike


Re: Rescue an old 400QMD?

alan137
 

Hi Anthony, 
I don't know how this groups.io thing works.  I only access it thru the web interface, so not email, and therefore I don't have your address.  But maybe you can see mine?


Mach2 in a Pelican Case

Shane Ramotowski
 

Hi all!

My Mach2 is finally portable!  I bought a Pelican 1560 case and adapted it to securely hold the Mach2 during transport.

See:
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican.jpg>
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/mach2_pelican_empty.jpg>

The frame is 3/4 inch plywood lined with 5mm neoprene wherever it is in contact with the mount.  The Mach2 fits (almost too) snugly and does not move at all when in the case.  The black area on the lid contacts the mount on the RA axis to keep it from moving in the out-of-the-case direction when the lid is closed.  The frame is attached to the bottom of the case by 4 L brackets and to the front and back with 4 bolts each through the side of the case, a plastic wedge and the frame itself.  The frame does not move in the case and the Mach2 does not move in the frame.

You can see the white plastic wedge and bolts here:
<http://www.kor-astro.net/misc/pelican_bolts.jpg>

I have to take the saddle off and drop the altitude all the way to fit it in, but it's OK as the mount it only takes a minute to put the saddle back on and only about 3 minutes to polar align, which I would have to do anyway, since I just moved the mount.  I'm going to store the saddle in the area to the right of the mount in a pouch.

Ready for a Star Party!

- Shane

--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@cotse.net
https://www.kor-astro.net


Re: Back Focus Troubles #Absolute_Encoders

M Hambrick
 

Hi David

In my sketch, item C is a custom adapter that I purchased from Precise Parts. On the Precise Parts web site I specified the A-P 92 Stowaway flattener (92FF) on the scope side, and on the camera side I specified the SBIG FW8S-STXL Filter Wheel with Dovetail noseplate. The dimension "C" on the sketch is the effective length of the adapter. The determination of this dimension is discussed below. 

If you look on the sketch you will see dimension "X". This distance (64.1 mm or 2.254") is the specified backfocus distance from the rear face of the 92FF to the CCD sensor surface. This dimension comes from the specifications for the 92FF from Astro-Physics.

This nominal backfocus distance is the sum of dimensions A + B + C + D where:
  • A = The OPTICAL backfocus distance from the face of the camera/filter wheel to the CCD surface. This dimension is fixed and comes from the specifications for the camera and filter wheel. Make sure to use the optical backfocus distance and not the mechanical backfocus. I made that mistake once and had to get the adapter modified.
  • B = The thickness of the dovetail nose piece on the filter wheel. This dimension also comes from the specifications for the camera.
  • D = The thickness of a 1 mm spacer ring (0.040"). It is recommended that the custom adapters should be designed so as to allow the actual backfocus distance to be tweaked to optimize the flatness of the images in the corners. The adapter length is therefore specified assuming that there will be one spacer ring to get the nominal backfocus. You can remove the spacer ring to get the nominal backfocus - 1 mm, and you can add an additional spacer ring to get the nominal backfocus + 1 mm.
  • C = This is the effective length of your adapter and is equal to X - (A + B + D)

I ordered the spacer rings from Precise Parts because Astro-Physics does not offer them - Yet. I believe I saw a post where they plan to do so soon. These spacer rings have to fit inside the custom adapter and rest against the shoulder. They were not cheap, and I would suggest asking Astro-Physics when they will be available before you go to Precise Parts. If you go the Precise Parts route, you will specify a washer/shim on the scope side, and on the camera side you must specify the A-P 92FF/92TCC Canon EF camera adapter. The effective length is 1.0 mm.

I hope this helps

Mike  


Re: Rescue an old 400QMD?

Tom Blahovici
 

On Sat, Jun 12, 2021 at 02:33 PM, alan137 wrote:
As long as the hand controller is missing anyway, can it be converted over to a GTO version?
Or how about adding DSC and turn it into push-TO, and then use the ST4 port for 16x crawl-TO?
If you have a 3d printer (all ATMs should have one..) it would be easy to build a push to using a Nexus II and a couple of encoders. It has WiFi, is inexpensive and will connect to Sky Safari on an Android or iOS phone..
All you need to do is build a pulley, and then a holding mechanism for the encoder. Get CUI encoders. 8092 ticks and about $20 each.
I built such a device for a home made binocular mount. 
Tom


Re: Enter time into AP polar scope software

Dale Ghent
 

What would they need signal for? Phone GPS for location and its own internal clock are all that are required.

On Jun 12, 2021, at 17:28, drgert1 via groups.io <drgert1=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote:

But do all these phone apps work when there is no signal connection at the observing location?
Cheers,
Gert


Re: Date-time format / APCC issues #APCC

Rodolphe
 

Thanks Ray, good to know.
Rodolphe


Re: Rescue an old 400QMD?

alan137
 

As long as the hand controller is missing anyway, can it be converted over to a GTO version?
Or how about adding DSC and turn it into push-TO, and then use the ST4 port for 16x crawl-TO?

5221 - 5240 of 84252