Date   

Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Keith Egger
 

Yes, I've had it a while! Yes, original gear box with the two allen head screws for adjustment of the gear mesh. Still a great mount though - a workhorse.

Do you have instructions for greasing the top rotating bearing? I would probably want to re-grease the worm and wheel at the same time. Is the AeroShell 33 ok to use for both?

Keith


Re: APPM for single target #APCC #Mach2GTO

Worsel
 

David

There have been posts in the post showing that building a model along the declinaton of the single object works well.  See lengthy thread at https://ap-gto.groups.io/g/main/topic/77675005

In addition, Ray Gralak is working on an upgrade to APPC Pro that will include declination-arc tracking that is very accurate.  I defer to Ray for further info on timing for this.

Bryan


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Roland Christen
 

There are no nylon clutch plugs in the Mach1. There is nothing to stick. However, the grease in the top rotating bearing may be drying out and could use some new grease. It sounds like your Mach1 is quite old and has the original gearbox without the release lever.

Rolando

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Egger <eggerk@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Thu, Mar 4, 2021 6:57 am
Subject: [ap-gto] Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

The RA axis on my Mach1GTO (104xx series) is getting quite sticky in RA. I've searched and found reference to the nylon clutch plugs sticking (not sure it applies to this mount) and reference to documentation on the website as to how to fix. I can't find such documentation on the webpage. Can someone point me in the right direction?

It's also about time for a re-grease of the mount. I have some AeroShell #33 grease (the blue-green kind, without sulfur) but there is reference to two kinds of grease and to detailed instructions which again I have been unable to locate on the webpage.

thanks

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Keith Egger
 

I read about the grease kit, but couldn't find it on the website. So you have to phone to order then. Only issue is that I'm in Canada and, no offense Astro-Physics, but ordering from Canada is very difficult, including (at least in the past) faxing of a copy of your credit card. Maybe I can get it through a Canadian distributor (KW Telescope) but I'm not sure? Either way, getting a kit to Canada is bound to be more complex than it needs be and take some considerable amount of time. I have the AeroShell 33 which is used for the worm and wheel I take it? What kind of grease is used for the gear box? It would probably be easier to find a supplier in Canada. Are the instructions that come with the grease kit available?

Keith


APPM for single target #APCC #Mach2GTO

David Johnson
 

Just received my Mach2 and very happy with it. Until I get a permanent setup, I set up and break down my system just about every time I use it. I have APPM working, but I was thinking last night that since I tend to have one imaging target all night, I really don’t need a model for the whole sky and should be able to save considerable time by densely modeling just along the declination of the target. Can I please get some tips for using APPM for this kind of situation?  Thanks. 


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

steve711614
 

I got my mach1 about 8 weeks ago and the dec was sticking and sounded like metal rubbing against metal so I stripped it down and there wasnt any signs of grease left 
I have used lubriplate 105  on mine I saw it mentioned on a post so hopefully it will do the job 


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Keith Olsen
 

Call Astro-Physics and ask for the grease kit.  It comes with two types of grease.  One for the gear box and one for the worm and worm wheel.  It also comes with instructions.  The grease is great, and it sticks, after I regreased my Mach1 I had a hard time removing the film of grease off of my fingers :).


Re: APPM with Dome Questions

Ron Kramer
 

PS the other issue is ASTAP is vastly superior to platesolve2.  I no longer have the later configured. 
I would recommend supporting NINA and ASTAP instead since both are free.  Unlike SGP. (buy something just to configure APPM)? 


On Thu, Mar 4, 2021 at 10:01 AM Ron Kramer via groups.io <ronkramer1957=gmail.com@groups.io> wrote:
Following.  I read the thread and have experienced much the same as Shane.   APPM, scope and dome do not play together on my setup either. timing is off and it's quite a chore to revert back to SGP which I normally have deleted from my observatory drive.  I have been waiting to use APPM for when NINA is supported. 
Shane, give NINA a try (free) it's jaw-droppingly good coming from SGP. 

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:33 AM Shane Ramotowski <kor@...> wrote:
OK.  I'll see if I can install and test it.

I apologize: "depricated" was not the term they used.  POTH has been
"retired" and "will be removed in a future release".

 From the v6.5/v6.5.SP1 Version History
<https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Platform/html/FC49CB34-01CF-4D01-BE66-6D55796512D5.htm>:

    > Retired  Components

    The following Platform 5 hubs have been retired in this release and
    are replaced by the new Device Hub. We strongly recommend that you
    switch over to using the Device Hub because these components will be
    removed in a future release.

      * POTH
      * Hub
      * Pipe
      * Dome Control Hub


- Shane

On 2/28/2021 8:49 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > I was unable to test POTH, as you
>
> > suggested, since it is depricated, no longer part of the ASCOM 6.5SP1
>
> > distribution
>
> Sorry, but that is incorrect!
>
> By default, POTH is not installed, but it can be installed if you
> select it..
>
> Here’s a screenshot of the ASCOM 6.5 SP1 Setup:
>
> -Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:06 PM
>
> > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> >
>
> > Not personally, but I would think that anyone using a rotational dome
>
> > would need some way to position it so that the telescope is not blocked
>
> > by the slot. Since the "Active" mode doesn't do the geometry, unless
>
> > you have a very wide slot that goes significantly past vertical,
>
> > "Passive" is really the only option.  I was unable to test POTH, as you
>
> > suggested, since it is depricated, no longer part of the ASCOM 6.5SP1
>
> > distribution, and I could not find a download of it from a reliable
>
> > source.  I would expect, however, that it would have a similar issue,
>
> > either needing to know where the telescope is slewing to or slewing the
>
> > dome by polling the telescope's position periodically.  SGP has slaving
>
> > that works well and has a minimum polling frequency of 1 seconds.  But
>
> > it was made with the intention of some other application connecting to
>
> > SGP to query the dome slewing state.  I don't know of any other solution
>
> > than DeviceHub if you are running up-to-date ASCOM.
>
> >
>
> > Of course if you have a roll-off, open clam shell, or are just outside,
>
> > you don't need any dome support all!
>
> >
>
> > I'm guessing, based on my serial number, that there are a little over
>
> > 120 Mach2's out there that came with APPM.  I don't know how many copies
>
> > of APPM are being used by 1100 and 1600 users, nor how many of those
>
> > users along with other Mach2 owners have rotational domes (I think
>
> > roll-offs are much more popular), but I am a bit surprised that this has
>
> > not been brought up before.  The Mach2 is fairly compact and I am using
>
> > a 4" refractor, so my geometry ought to be about as optimal as it gets.
>
> > The slot in my dome looks to be a similar proportion to other domes I've
>
> > seen; it is by no means overly narrow.  And yet, in Active mode, for
>
> > most of the sample points, the dome ends up covering more than half of
>
> > the telescopes view, so I need to use Passive mode.  Maybe I really am
>
> > doing something totally wrong and stupid, but I sure don't know what
>
> > that would be...
>
> >
>
> > - Shane
>
> >
>
> > On 2/28/2021 7:19 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > > Shane,
>
> > >
>
> > >> As far as the APPM specific commands, could you allow a connection to
>
> > >> DeviceHub to send the info necessary for the slew and then send the
>
> > >> "special sauce" directly to the AP V2 driver?
>
> > > I would have to bring this up with Marj to see if this is something A-P would want
> to have implemented and
>
> > supported. Are you aware of any others thatwould want this feature?
>
> > >
>
> > > -Ray
>
> > >
>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:29 PM
>
> > >> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>
>
> > >> When using DeviceHub, if you are connected to both DeviceHub's telescope
>
> > >> and dome drivers, then when you issue a telescope slew, DeviceHub knows
>
> > >> the target RA and DEC and can start a dome slew to the azimuth that the
>
> > >> telescope will end at.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> If you cannot connect to the DeviceHub telescope and/or dome, then
>
> > >> DeviceHub uses a polling scheme to ask where the telescope is and then
>
> > >> send the dome to the correct azimuth.The polling period,
>
> > >> unfortunately, seems to have a minimum of 5 seconds.So, during an APPM
>
> > >> run, APPM will tell the telescope to slew.Sometime less than 5 seconds
>
> > >> later, DeviceHub will retrieve the current RA/DEC from the telescope and
>
> > >> start the dome slewing to that position.For longer slews, the
>
> > >> telescope may still be moving.5 seconds after the dome arrives at the
>
> > >> indicated position, it finds that the telescope has moved again (in
>
> > >> acutality, the telescope never stopped moving, simply completing its
>
> > >> original slew.So DeviceHub issues a second slew to get to the final
>
> > >> position.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> So for the Passive settings in APPM, I have to use timeouts long enough
>
> > >> to account for 2 polling periods plus 2 slew times to ensure that the
>
> > >> dome is really in position before imaging starts.I can't let APPM
>
> > >> catch the dome in a stopped state between two dome slews. I hope that
>
> > >> makes sense.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> I ran a large model last night using DeviceHub.I lost 5 points in
>
> > >> total, which isn't that bad.Three of them were because of the
>
> > >> bodaciously bright almost full moon and the other two were bad luck in
>
> > >> the timing of long slews from the end of on string of points to the
>
> > >> start of the next.I was concerned that DeviceHub would not position
>
> > >> properly for the counterweight-up points, but it did so correctly.The
>
> > >> model run took a lot longer than I expected since I was waiting 40
>
> > >> seconds (usually unnecessarily) for each point to give the dome time to
>
> > >> get into position in case it was a long slew.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> I really don't know if supporting DeviceHub's telescope driver will
>
> > >> work.I'm assuming that if the SideOfPier property is set correctly
>
> > >> when the slew is issued, DeviceHub will go to the correct location even
>
> > >> if it ends up counterweight-up.But I haven't tested that and I really
>
> > >> don't know how--well I guess I could write a little program to do that.
>
> > >> I will do so if you are considering adding such support and the results
>
> > >> of that test would help.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> As far as the APPM specific commands, could you allow a connection to
>
> > >> DeviceHub to send the info necessary for the slew and then send the
>
> > >> "special sauce" directly to the AP V2 driver?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> - Shane
>
> > >>
>
> > >> On 2/28/2021 8:10 AM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>> Hi Shane,
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>> One more question, Ray:In APPM, is there a way to connect to the
>
> > >>>> DeviceHub telescope or is it locked to the AP ASCOM driver?
>
> > >>> You would not want to connect APPM to the DeviceHub telescope. APPM uses
> some commands that the
>
> > >> DeviceHub would not be able to pass through to the AP V2 driver.
>
> > >>> That said, what is the use case for this?
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> -Ray
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf
> Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:52 AM
>
> > >>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> One more question, Ray:In APPM, is there a way to connect to the
>
> > >>>> DeviceHub telescope or is it locked to the AP ASCOM driver?
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> On 2/27/2021 8:09 PM, Shane Ramotowski wrote:
>
> > >>>>> Ahh, I think it understand.I use DeviceHub to do the slaving, but
>
> > >>>>> still connect to the DeviceHub dome with APPM.I will try that and
>
> > >>>>> see what happens.
>
> > >>>>>
>
> > >>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>
>
> > >>>>> On 2/27/2021 5:27 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> OK.I'll wait for the ASCOM folks to add the APIs that you
> want before
>
> > >>>>>>> I try to use "Active" mode again.
>
> > >>>>>> I think you misunderstood. ASCOM is not planning to add those
> APIs.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> For the second part of my reply, I guess I did not make it
> clear enough
>
> > >>>>>>> that I was using DeviceHub not allowing APPM to connect to
> the dome,
>
> > >>>>>>> since APPM cannot send the dome to the correct position an
> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>> can. _I am simply trying to understand what I'm doing wrong when
>
> > >>>>>>> setting
>
> > >>>>>>> up "Passive" parameters in the "Dome Settings" box.__
>
> > >>>>>> In passive mode, APPM only needs to poll the Dome's slewing
> state to
>
> > >>>>>> work. If you can't do that then APPM won't be able to tell
> when the
>
> > >>>>>> dome is done slewing.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> If Device Hub won't let APPM connect to the Dome driver you
> can use
>
> > >>>>>> the older ASCOM POTH application, which allows multiple
> applications
>
> > >>>>>> to connect to an ASCOM driver.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> So can you please tell me what settings I can use for "Delay
> before
>
> > >>>>>>> staring dome slew check" and "Settle time after dome stops
> slewing" to
>
> > >>>>>>> ensure that I end up with at least 30 seconds between the end
> of the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope slew and the start of imaging?
>
> > >>>>>> First, the two parameters only have meaning when you are
> connected to
>
> > >>>>>> a Dome driver. If you are not connected they won't be used.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> "Delay before starting dome slew checking"
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> The number of seconds before APPM will start checking the dome
>
> > >>>>>> driver's slew state. This delay allows the dome driver time to
>
> > >>>>>> initiate dome movement that will be reflected by reading
> "True" from
>
> > >>>>>> the Dome driver's "Slewing" property. If the value is False when
>
> > >>>>>> read, then dome slewing will be considered completed.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> "Settle time after dome stops slewing"
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> The number of seconds to delay slew completion after the Dome
>
> > >>>>>> driver's "Slewing" property reads "False".
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
> Behalf
>
> > >>>>>>> Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 2:16 PM
>
> > >>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> OK.I'll wait for the ASCOM folks to add the APIs that you
> want before
>
> > >>>>>>> I try to use "Active" mode again.
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> For the second part of my reply, I guess I did not make it
> clear enough
>
> > >>>>>>> that I was using DeviceHub not allowing APPM to connect to
> the dome,
>
> > >>>>>>> since APPM cannot send the dome to the correct position an
> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>> can. _I am simply trying to understand what I'm doing wrong when
>
> > >>>>>>> setting
>
> > >>>>>>> up "Passive" parameters in the "Dome Settings" box.__
>
> > >>>>>>> _
>
> > >>>>>>> So can you please tell me what settings I can use for "Delay
> before
>
> > >>>>>>> staring dome slew check" and "Settle time after dome stops
> slewing" to
>
> > >>>>>>> ensure that I end up with at least 30 seconds between the end
> of the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope slew and the start of imaging?Assume that I did not
> change
>
> > >>>>>>> the default telescope slew of 900X.The log entry I posted is
> from a
>
> > >>>>>>> session that used DeviceHub with "Delay before starting dome slew
>
> > >>>>>>> check"
>
> > >>>>>>> set to 30 seconds and "Settle time after dome stops slewing"
> set to 10
>
> > >>>>>>> seconds.You can see that the time between the start of the
> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>> slew and the the start of imaging is about 12 seconds.So,
> clearly, I
>
> > >>>>>>> am not understanding how these two parameters work.
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> Thank you - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 2:16 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, so how does that work?What part of the ASCOM dome API
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> be?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> <https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Developer/html/T_ASCOM_DriverAccess_Dome.htm>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>> Again, APPM does not do dome calculations (nor is there a
> plan for
>
> > >>>>>>>> it to do that). IMO, the ASCOM Dome API
>
> > >>>>>>> is missing a way to send scope Ra/Dec/pierside to the Dome
> driver.
>
> > >>>>>>> ASCOM makes such a big deal about
>
> > >>>>>>> abstracting away telescope applications from the hardware,
> but the
>
> > >>>>>>> incomplete Dome API pretty much forces
>
> > >>>>>>> the use of a third-party application.
>
> > >>>>>>>> I think each dome manufacturer should each create their own
> drivers
>
> > >>>>>>>> that should take into account the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope and mount dimensions. It would have made life much
> easier
>
> > >>>>>>> for each application developer that has
>
> > >>>>>>> had to implement dome coordinate transformations in their
> applications.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> That is exactly what I expected.What should I set the two
> passive
>
> > >>>>>>>>> values to to ensure that the imaging doesn't start for,
> say, 1 minute
>
> > >>>>>>>>> after the scope stops slewing?Or am I not understanding the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> meaning of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> those two fields and their documentation in the manual?
>
> > >>>>>>>> To use passive mode the dome driver or application must be
> slaved
>
> > >>>>>>>> to the telescope. In this case APPM just
>
> > >>>>>>> polls the slewing state until dome slewing stops. If slaving
> can't
>
> > >>>>>>> be done, there is an option in APPM to pause
>
> > >>>>>>> after each point, which would allow you to position the dome
> opening.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The total time between the start of the point's processing and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> start of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> it's imaging is about 12 seconds.Shouldn't that be at least 40
>
> > >>>>>>>>> seconds
>
> > >>>>>>>>> to allow the dome delay and settle times to happen?What am I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> misunderstanding?.
>
> > >>>>>>>> There are no dome messages in your post so I can't tell you what
>
> > >>>>>>>> happened. Are you sure that you had
>
> > >>>>>>> APPM connected to your Dome application?
>
> > >>>>>>>> BTW, the problem might be that you are using the ASCOM
> Device Hub
>
> > >>>>>>>> instead of the older POTH dome
>
> > >>>>>>> handling. The behavior is dome behavior is different in
> Device Hub,
>
> > >>>>>>> and it sounds like the author left out some
>
> > >>>>>>> old functionality.
>
> > >>>>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 11:32 AM
>
> > >>>>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Ray, thanks for the reply, but I don't really see anything that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> will help.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, so how does that work?What part of the ASCOM dome API
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> be?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> <https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Developer/html/T_ASCOM_DriverAccess_Dome.htm>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> I am definitely returning false fort the CanSlave and Slaved
>
> > >>>>>>>>> properties,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> since there is no hardware-based slaving capability in the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> controller.And I don't see way to "send the telescope's
> destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>> coordinates" to the ASCOM driver.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The call that the ASCOM driver receives from APPM is
>
> > >>>>>>>>> "SlewToAzimuth()"
>
> > >>>>>>>>> but I think you are basing that azimuth on the center of
> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> rather
>
> > >>>>>>>>> than the position of the telescope, which can be significantly
>
> > >>>>>>>>> different--consider the initial slew to zenith in which the
> RA axis
>
> > >>>>>>>>> rotates west and level and the DEC axis point strait up. The
>
> > >>>>>>>>> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>> is several inches West of the center of the mount.From what I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> understand, if you are going to use SlewToAzimuth(), you
> need to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> consider this.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> If you look at ASCOM's DeviceHub, written by Rick and Pete, who
>
> > >>>>>>>>> answer
>
> > >>>>>>>>> most of the dome-related questions posted to the ASCOM
> Driver and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Application Development Support Forum, it has a whole
> section for
>
> > >>>>>>>>> dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> and mount geometry in it's setup section to allow slaving.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> That is exactly what I expected.What should I set the two
> passive
>
> > >>>>>>>>> values to to ensure that the imaging doesn't start for,
> say, 1 minute
>
> > >>>>>>>>> after the scope stops slewing?Or am I not understanding the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> meaning of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> those two fields and their documentation in the manual?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Here is a log excerpt from one of my attempts last night. Under
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Settings->Dome Settings, Passive is selected, "Delay before
> starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> dome slew checking" is set to 30 seconds and "Settle time
> after dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> stops slewing" is set to 10 seconds.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467221 2021-02-26 20:46:21.965:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=SlewNext
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467222 2021-02-26 20:46:22.103:Info, SlewNext, Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Slew to Point 3 RA: 08h 30m 06.56s, HA: -01h 20m 00.00s,
> Dec: -10°
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00'
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467223 2021-02-26 20:46:22.105:Info,Slew Next,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> East=True,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Dec=-10, HA=-1.33333333333333, MerDelay=-0.25, MerOffset=0
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467224 2021-02-26 20:46:22.105:Info, Meridian, Setting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Meridian Delay to -0.25 (-00h 15m 00.00s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467225 2021-02-26 20:46:22.144: Info, SlewAsync, Begin
>
> > >>>>>>>>> UnSAFE Slew to RA/Dec:8.501824 / -10.000000 ( 08h 30m 06.56s /
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -10°
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467226 2021-02-26 20:46:22.215:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=PreSlewing
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467227 2021-02-26 20:46:25.482:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=Slewing
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467228 2021-02-26 20:46:30.722:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=StartSettle
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467229 2021-02-26 20:46:30.741:Info, StartSettle, Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Settle wait time
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467230 2021-02-26 20:46:30.970:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=WaitSettle
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467231 2021-02-26 20:46:32.974:Info, WaitSettle, Settling
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Time Complete
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467232 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, Finished
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Slew to Point 3
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467233 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, RA/Dec:
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 8.501833 / -10.000000 ( 08h 30m 06.60s /-10° 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467234 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, HA/Dec:
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -1.329942 / -10.000000 (-01h 19m 47.79s /-10° 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467235 2021-02-26 20:46:33.226:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=StartImage
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467236 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Exposure, Duration=5 LST=7.17191416666667 (07h 10m 18.89s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467237 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info,State Machine, LST mid
>
> > >>>>>>>>> image=7.1727475 (07h 10m 21.89s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467238 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info, StartTakeImage, Sequence
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Generator Pro: Binning=1, Subframe Type: 0, Duration=5,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> IsDarkFrame=False
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The total time between the start of the point's processing and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> start of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> it's imaging is about 12 seconds.Shouldn't that be at least 40
>
> > >>>>>>>>> seconds
>
> > >>>>>>>>> to allow the dome delay and settle times to happen?What am I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> misunderstanding?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The dome controller and ASCOM driver do handle Slewing property
>
> > >>>>>>>>> correctly, returning TRUE from the time that the
> slewToAzimuth() is
>
> > >>>>>>>>> issued until the dome is stopped at the requested position,
> then
>
> > >>>>>>>>> returning FALSE until the next slew is issuedSometimes,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> DeviceHub or
>
> > >>>>>>>>> SGP will end up issuing more than one slew to get the dome
> to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> final
>
> > >>>>>>>>> position.The slaving software notices that the telescope has
>
> > >>>>>>>>> moved and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> starts an azimuth slew to where is while the telescope is still
>
> > >>>>>>>>> moving.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Once the dome arrives at that position, another azimuth slew to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> get to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> where the telescope finally stopped.Last night, the longest
> time
>
> > >>>>>>>>> that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> such multiple slews took was about 20 seconds.That is why I
> set the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> "Delay before starting dome slew checking" to 30 seconds. I
> though
>
> > >>>>>>>>> that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would make APPM not even check for a dome slew until the
> dome was in
>
> > >>>>>>>>> place and had stopped moving.Instead, it seemed to have made no
>
> > >>>>>>>>> difference: the imaging started almost as soon as the telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>> arrived
>
> > >>>>>>>>> at its position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 10:06 AM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to
>
> > >>>>>>> the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>> application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> So, it seems that your dome's ascom driver (or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application) may not be correctly indicating
>
> > >>>>>>> when
>
> > >>>>>>>>> the dome is slewing.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:19 PM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi gang,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am the proud owner of a brand new (well 2 weeks) Mach2 and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tried to do
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> my first APPM model tonight.I'm having problems with the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> control
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and hope someone can point in the right direction.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> My observatory is a ClearSkys (I don't think they are around
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anymore) 8
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ft dome.The pier is centered and the bottom of the mount is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> just about
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> even with the bottom of the dome.The rotation control is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> homemade (my
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> COVID quarantine project) and works very will with both ASCOM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and SGP.I'm using SGP for image capture and plate solve.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can't figure out how to set up APPM to control the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> properly. If I
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> use "Active" in the "AP Point Mapper - Dome Settings" panel,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> APPM seems
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to do it's calculations based on the center of the dome
> instead
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of where
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the telescope is.This is not surprising since I can't seem to
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> find any
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> where in the program or the documentation to set the
> mount and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> geometry.I suppose, since APCC knows that I'm using a
> Mach2, it
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> _could_ already know roughly how far from the center of the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> RA/DEC axes
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> intersection the bottom of my telescope is.But I don't see
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anyway that
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> it could know where the center of my OTA is.I really don't
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> think it's
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> using the parameters from 3D view; I haven't set that up,
> but the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> default is a much larger diameter telescope than mine.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>Anyway, when I use "Active", I end up imaging across the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> edge of the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> slot because the slot is positioned for the center of the
> mount
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> instead
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of where the telescope is.Most of the images ended up plate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> solving
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anyway, but sincethe stars are all diffraction spikes, I
> don't
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> know
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the quality of those solutions.The initial slew to
> meridian is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> probably the worst because the dome is in the exact opposite
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> position
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> than it should be and my slot just goes barely past
> vertical.I
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> checked the ASCOM logs on the PC and my ASCOM debug screen on
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> controller.The dome _is_ slewing to the position that APPM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> requests;
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that position just doesn't seem to be based on where the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> telescope is.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?Where do I enter the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> offsets for
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the mount/scope geometer so that APPM can got to the correct
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> position?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> So, after trying "Active", I swiched to "Passive" and
> tried with
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> two
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> different dome slaving programs: ASCOM Device Hub and SGP.For
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Delay
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> before starting dome slew checking", I used values
> ranging from
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 5 to 30
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> seconds.For "Settle time after dome stops slewing", I used
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> values from
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1 to 20 seconds.I didn't see any effect when changing these
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> settings;
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in all cases the the telescope slewed to the next
> position and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> started
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> imaging a few seconds after it got there--many seconds before
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> was in position.None of those images solved since the
> dome was
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> way.Again, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong--it's like
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> even changing the values.Is there another setting that I'm
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> missing
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that enables these timeouts?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure someone else has successfully done an APPM run
> from an
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> automated dome!What am I missing?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>> --
>
> > >>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >> --
>
> > >> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >> kor@...
>
> > >> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Shane Ramotowski
>
> > kor@...
>
> > https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>

--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@...
https://www.kor-astro.net








--




Re: APPM with Dome Questions

Ron Kramer
 

Following.  I read the thread and have experienced much the same as Shane.   APPM, scope and dome do not play together on my setup either. timing is off and it's quite a chore to revert back to SGP which I normally have deleted from my observatory drive.  I have been waiting to use APPM for when NINA is supported. 
Shane, give NINA a try (free) it's jaw-droppingly good coming from SGP. 

On Mon, Mar 1, 2021 at 8:33 AM Shane Ramotowski <kor@...> wrote:
OK.  I'll see if I can install and test it.

I apologize: "depricated" was not the term they used.  POTH has been
"retired" and "will be removed in a future release".

 From the v6.5/v6.5.SP1 Version History
<https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Platform/html/FC49CB34-01CF-4D01-BE66-6D55796512D5.htm>:

    > Retired  Components

    The following Platform 5 hubs have been retired in this release and
    are replaced by the new Device Hub. We strongly recommend that you
    switch over to using the Device Hub because these components will be
    removed in a future release.

      * POTH
      * Hub
      * Pipe
      * Dome Control Hub


- Shane

On 2/28/2021 8:49 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > I was unable to test POTH, as you
>
> > suggested, since it is depricated, no longer part of the ASCOM 6.5SP1
>
> > distribution
>
> Sorry, but that is incorrect!
>
> By default, POTH is not installed, but it can be installed if you
> select it..
>
> Here’s a screenshot of the ASCOM 6.5 SP1 Setup:
>
> -Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
>
> > From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 7:06 PM
>
> > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> >
>
> > Not personally, but I would think that anyone using a rotational dome
>
> > would need some way to position it so that the telescope is not blocked
>
> > by the slot. Since the "Active" mode doesn't do the geometry, unless
>
> > you have a very wide slot that goes significantly past vertical,
>
> > "Passive" is really the only option.  I was unable to test POTH, as you
>
> > suggested, since it is depricated, no longer part of the ASCOM 6.5SP1
>
> > distribution, and I could not find a download of it from a reliable
>
> > source.  I would expect, however, that it would have a similar issue,
>
> > either needing to know where the telescope is slewing to or slewing the
>
> > dome by polling the telescope's position periodically.  SGP has slaving
>
> > that works well and has a minimum polling frequency of 1 seconds.  But
>
> > it was made with the intention of some other application connecting to
>
> > SGP to query the dome slewing state.  I don't know of any other solution
>
> > than DeviceHub if you are running up-to-date ASCOM.
>
> >
>
> > Of course if you have a roll-off, open clam shell, or are just outside,
>
> > you don't need any dome support all!
>
> >
>
> > I'm guessing, based on my serial number, that there are a little over
>
> > 120 Mach2's out there that came with APPM.  I don't know how many copies
>
> > of APPM are being used by 1100 and 1600 users, nor how many of those
>
> > users along with other Mach2 owners have rotational domes (I think
>
> > roll-offs are much more popular), but I am a bit surprised that this has
>
> > not been brought up before.  The Mach2 is fairly compact and I am using
>
> > a 4" refractor, so my geometry ought to be about as optimal as it gets.
>
> > The slot in my dome looks to be a similar proportion to other domes I've
>
> > seen; it is by no means overly narrow.  And yet, in Active mode, for
>
> > most of the sample points, the dome ends up covering more than half of
>
> > the telescopes view, so I need to use Passive mode.  Maybe I really am
>
> > doing something totally wrong and stupid, but I sure don't know what
>
> > that would be...
>
> >
>
> > - Shane
>
> >
>
> > On 2/28/2021 7:19 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > > Shane,
>
> > >
>
> > >> As far as the APPM specific commands, could you allow a connection to
>
> > >> DeviceHub to send the info necessary for the slew and then send the
>
> > >> "special sauce" directly to the AP V2 driver?
>
> > > I would have to bring this up with Marj to see if this is something A-P would want
> to have implemented and
>
> > supported. Are you aware of any others thatwould want this feature?
>
> > >
>
> > > -Ray
>
> > >
>
> > >> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of
> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 4:29 PM
>
> > >> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>
>
> > >> When using DeviceHub, if you are connected to both DeviceHub's telescope
>
> > >> and dome drivers, then when you issue a telescope slew, DeviceHub knows
>
> > >> the target RA and DEC and can start a dome slew to the azimuth that the
>
> > >> telescope will end at.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> If you cannot connect to the DeviceHub telescope and/or dome, then
>
> > >> DeviceHub uses a polling scheme to ask where the telescope is and then
>
> > >> send the dome to the correct azimuth.The polling period,
>
> > >> unfortunately, seems to have a minimum of 5 seconds.So, during an APPM
>
> > >> run, APPM will tell the telescope to slew.Sometime less than 5 seconds
>
> > >> later, DeviceHub will retrieve the current RA/DEC from the telescope and
>
> > >> start the dome slewing to that position.For longer slews, the
>
> > >> telescope may still be moving.5 seconds after the dome arrives at the
>
> > >> indicated position, it finds that the telescope has moved again (in
>
> > >> acutality, the telescope never stopped moving, simply completing its
>
> > >> original slew.So DeviceHub issues a second slew to get to the final
>
> > >> position.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> So for the Passive settings in APPM, I have to use timeouts long enough
>
> > >> to account for 2 polling periods plus 2 slew times to ensure that the
>
> > >> dome is really in position before imaging starts.I can't let APPM
>
> > >> catch the dome in a stopped state between two dome slews. I hope that
>
> > >> makes sense.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> I ran a large model last night using DeviceHub.I lost 5 points in
>
> > >> total, which isn't that bad.Three of them were because of the
>
> > >> bodaciously bright almost full moon and the other two were bad luck in
>
> > >> the timing of long slews from the end of on string of points to the
>
> > >> start of the next.I was concerned that DeviceHub would not position
>
> > >> properly for the counterweight-up points, but it did so correctly.The
>
> > >> model run took a lot longer than I expected since I was waiting 40
>
> > >> seconds (usually unnecessarily) for each point to give the dome time to
>
> > >> get into position in case it was a long slew.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> I really don't know if supporting DeviceHub's telescope driver will
>
> > >> work.I'm assuming that if the SideOfPier property is set correctly
>
> > >> when the slew is issued, DeviceHub will go to the correct location even
>
> > >> if it ends up counterweight-up.But I haven't tested that and I really
>
> > >> don't know how--well I guess I could write a little program to do that.
>
> > >> I will do so if you are considering adding such support and the results
>
> > >> of that test would help.
>
> > >>
>
> > >> As far as the APPM specific commands, could you allow a connection to
>
> > >> DeviceHub to send the info necessary for the slew and then send the
>
> > >> "special sauce" directly to the AP V2 driver?
>
> > >>
>
> > >> - Shane
>
> > >>
>
> > >> On 2/28/2021 8:10 AM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>> Hi Shane,
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>> One more question, Ray:In APPM, is there a way to connect to the
>
> > >>>> DeviceHub telescope or is it locked to the AP ASCOM driver?
>
> > >>> You would not want to connect APPM to the DeviceHub telescope. APPM uses
> some commands that the
>
> > >> DeviceHub would not be able to pass through to the AP V2 driver.
>
> > >>> That said, what is the use case for this?
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>> -Ray
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf
> Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>> Sent: Sunday, February 28, 2021 3:52 AM
>
> > >>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> One more question, Ray:In APPM, is there a way to connect to the
>
> > >>>> DeviceHub telescope or is it locked to the AP ASCOM driver?
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>> On 2/27/2021 8:09 PM, Shane Ramotowski wrote:
>
> > >>>>> Ahh, I think it understand.I use DeviceHub to do the slaving, but
>
> > >>>>> still connect to the DeviceHub dome with APPM.I will try that and
>
> > >>>>> see what happens.
>
> > >>>>>
>
> > >>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>
>
> > >>>>> On 2/27/2021 5:27 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>> Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> OK.I'll wait for the ASCOM folks to add the APIs that you
> want before
>
> > >>>>>>> I try to use "Active" mode again.
>
> > >>>>>> I think you misunderstood. ASCOM is not planning to add those
> APIs.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> For the second part of my reply, I guess I did not make it
> clear enough
>
> > >>>>>>> that I was using DeviceHub not allowing APPM to connect to
> the dome,
>
> > >>>>>>> since APPM cannot send the dome to the correct position an
> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>> can. _I am simply trying to understand what I'm doing wrong when
>
> > >>>>>>> setting
>
> > >>>>>>> up "Passive" parameters in the "Dome Settings" box.__
>
> > >>>>>> In passive mode, APPM only needs to poll the Dome's slewing
> state to
>
> > >>>>>> work. If you can't do that then APPM won't be able to tell
> when the
>
> > >>>>>> dome is done slewing.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> If Device Hub won't let APPM connect to the Dome driver you
> can use
>
> > >>>>>> the older ASCOM POTH application, which allows multiple
> applications
>
> > >>>>>> to connect to an ASCOM driver.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> So can you please tell me what settings I can use for "Delay
> before
>
> > >>>>>>> staring dome slew check" and "Settle time after dome stops
> slewing" to
>
> > >>>>>>> ensure that I end up with at least 30 seconds between the end
> of the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope slew and the start of imaging?
>
> > >>>>>> First, the two parameters only have meaning when you are
> connected to
>
> > >>>>>> a Dome driver. If you are not connected they won't be used.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> "Delay before starting dome slew checking"
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> The number of seconds before APPM will start checking the dome
>
> > >>>>>> driver's slew state. This delay allows the dome driver time to
>
> > >>>>>> initiate dome movement that will be reflected by reading
> "True" from
>
> > >>>>>> the Dome driver's "Slewing" property. If the value is False when
>
> > >>>>>> read, then dome slewing will be considered completed.
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> "Settle time after dome stops slewing"
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> The number of seconds to delay slew completion after the Dome
>
> > >>>>>> driver's "Slewing" property reads "False".
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
> Behalf
>
> > >>>>>>> Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 2:16 PM
>
> > >>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> OK.I'll wait for the ASCOM folks to add the APIs that you
> want before
>
> > >>>>>>> I try to use "Active" mode again.
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> For the second part of my reply, I guess I did not make it
> clear enough
>
> > >>>>>>> that I was using DeviceHub not allowing APPM to connect to
> the dome,
>
> > >>>>>>> since APPM cannot send the dome to the correct position an
> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>> can. _I am simply trying to understand what I'm doing wrong when
>
> > >>>>>>> setting
>
> > >>>>>>> up "Passive" parameters in the "Dome Settings" box.__
>
> > >>>>>>> _
>
> > >>>>>>> So can you please tell me what settings I can use for "Delay
> before
>
> > >>>>>>> staring dome slew check" and "Settle time after dome stops
> slewing" to
>
> > >>>>>>> ensure that I end up with at least 30 seconds between the end
> of the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope slew and the start of imaging?Assume that I did not
> change
>
> > >>>>>>> the default telescope slew of 900X.The log entry I posted is
> from a
>
> > >>>>>>> session that used DeviceHub with "Delay before starting dome slew
>
> > >>>>>>> check"
>
> > >>>>>>> set to 30 seconds and "Settle time after dome stops slewing"
> set to 10
>
> > >>>>>>> seconds.You can see that the time between the start of the
> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>> slew and the the start of imaging is about 12 seconds.So,
> clearly, I
>
> > >>>>>>> am not understanding how these two parameters work.
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> Thank you - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 2:16 PM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>> Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, so how does that work?What part of the ASCOM dome API
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> be?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> <https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Developer/html/T_ASCOM_DriverAccess_Dome.htm>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>> Again, APPM does not do dome calculations (nor is there a
> plan for
>
> > >>>>>>>> it to do that). IMO, the ASCOM Dome API
>
> > >>>>>>> is missing a way to send scope Ra/Dec/pierside to the Dome
> driver.
>
> > >>>>>>> ASCOM makes such a big deal about
>
> > >>>>>>> abstracting away telescope applications from the hardware,
> but the
>
> > >>>>>>> incomplete Dome API pretty much forces
>
> > >>>>>>> the use of a third-party application.
>
> > >>>>>>>> I think each dome manufacturer should each create their own
> drivers
>
> > >>>>>>>> that should take into account the
>
> > >>>>>>> telescope and mount dimensions. It would have made life much
> easier
>
> > >>>>>>> for each application developer that has
>
> > >>>>>>> had to implement dome coordinate transformations in their
> applications.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> That is exactly what I expected.What should I set the two
> passive
>
> > >>>>>>>>> values to to ensure that the imaging doesn't start for,
> say, 1 minute
>
> > >>>>>>>>> after the scope stops slewing?Or am I not understanding the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> meaning of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> those two fields and their documentation in the manual?
>
> > >>>>>>>> To use passive mode the dome driver or application must be
> slaved
>
> > >>>>>>>> to the telescope. In this case APPM just
>
> > >>>>>>> polls the slewing state until dome slewing stops. If slaving
> can't
>
> > >>>>>>> be done, there is an option in APPM to pause
>
> > >>>>>>> after each point, which would allow you to position the dome
> opening.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The total time between the start of the point's processing and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> start of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> it's imaging is about 12 seconds.Shouldn't that be at least 40
>
> > >>>>>>>>> seconds
>
> > >>>>>>>>> to allow the dome delay and settle times to happen?What am I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> misunderstanding?.
>
> > >>>>>>>> There are no dome messages in your post so I can't tell you what
>
> > >>>>>>>> happened. Are you sure that you had
>
> > >>>>>>> APPM connected to your Dome application?
>
> > >>>>>>>> BTW, the problem might be that you are using the ASCOM
> Device Hub
>
> > >>>>>>>> instead of the older POTH dome
>
> > >>>>>>> handling. The behavior is dome behavior is different in
> Device Hub,
>
> > >>>>>>> and it sounds like the author left out some
>
> > >>>>>>> old functionality.
>
> > >>>>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Sent: Saturday, February 27, 2021 11:32 AM
>
> > >>>>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Ray, thanks for the reply, but I don't really see anything that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> will help.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Hmmm, so how does that work?What part of the ASCOM dome API
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> be?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> <https://ascom-standards.org/Help/Developer/html/T_ASCOM_DriverAccess_Dome.htm>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> I am definitely returning false fort the CanSlave and Slaved
>
> > >>>>>>>>> properties,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> since there is no hardware-based slaving capability in the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> controller.And I don't see way to "send the telescope's
> destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>> coordinates" to the ASCOM driver.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The call that the ASCOM driver receives from APPM is
>
> > >>>>>>>>> "SlewToAzimuth()"
>
> > >>>>>>>>> but I think you are basing that azimuth on the center of
> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> rather
>
> > >>>>>>>>> than the position of the telescope, which can be significantly
>
> > >>>>>>>>> different--consider the initial slew to zenith in which the
> RA axis
>
> > >>>>>>>>> rotates west and level and the DEC axis point strait up. The
>
> > >>>>>>>>> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>> is several inches West of the center of the mount.From what I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> understand, if you are going to use SlewToAzimuth(), you
> need to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> consider this.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> If you look at ASCOM's DeviceHub, written by Rick and Pete, who
>
> > >>>>>>>>> answer
>
> > >>>>>>>>> most of the dome-related questions posted to the ASCOM
> Driver and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Application Development Support Forum, it has a whole
> section for
>
> > >>>>>>>>> dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> and mount geometry in it's setup section to allow slaving.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> That is exactly what I expected.What should I set the two
> passive
>
> > >>>>>>>>> values to to ensure that the imaging doesn't start for,
> say, 1 minute
>
> > >>>>>>>>> after the scope stops slewing?Or am I not understanding the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> meaning of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> those two fields and their documentation in the manual?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Here is a log excerpt from one of my attempts last night. Under
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Settings->Dome Settings, Passive is selected, "Delay before
> starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> dome slew checking" is set to 30 seconds and "Settle time
> after dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>> stops slewing" is set to 10 seconds.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467221 2021-02-26 20:46:21.965:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=SlewNext
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467222 2021-02-26 20:46:22.103:Info, SlewNext, Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Slew to Point 3 RA: 08h 30m 06.56s, HA: -01h 20m 00.00s,
> Dec: -10°
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00'
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467223 2021-02-26 20:46:22.105:Info,Slew Next,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> East=True,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Dec=-10, HA=-1.33333333333333, MerDelay=-0.25, MerOffset=0
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467224 2021-02-26 20:46:22.105:Info, Meridian, Setting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Meridian Delay to -0.25 (-00h 15m 00.00s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467225 2021-02-26 20:46:22.144: Info, SlewAsync, Begin
>
> > >>>>>>>>> UnSAFE Slew to RA/Dec:8.501824 / -10.000000 ( 08h 30m 06.56s /
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -10°
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467226 2021-02-26 20:46:22.215:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=PreSlewing
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467227 2021-02-26 20:46:25.482:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=Slewing
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467228 2021-02-26 20:46:30.722:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=StartSettle
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467229 2021-02-26 20:46:30.741:Info, StartSettle, Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Settle wait time
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467230 2021-02-26 20:46:30.970:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=WaitSettle
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467231 2021-02-26 20:46:32.974:Info, WaitSettle, Settling
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Time Complete
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467232 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, Finished
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Slew to Point 3
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467233 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, RA/Dec:
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 8.501833 / -10.000000 ( 08h 30m 06.60s /-10° 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467234 2021-02-26 20:46:33.022:Info, WaitSettle, HA/Dec:
>
> > >>>>>>>>> -1.329942 / -10.000000 (-01h 19m 47.79s /-10° 00' 00.0")
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467235 2021-02-26 20:46:33.226:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Entering
>
> > >>>>>>>>> State=StartImage
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467236 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info,State Machine,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Starting
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Exposure, Duration=5 LST=7.17191416666667 (07h 10m 18.89s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467237 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info,State Machine, LST mid
>
> > >>>>>>>>> image=7.1727475 (07h 10m 21.89s)
>
> > >>>>>>>>> 0467238 2021-02-26 20:46:33.260:Info, StartTakeImage, Sequence
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Generator Pro: Binning=1, Subframe Type: 0, Duration=5,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> IsDarkFrame=False
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The total time between the start of the point's processing and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> start of
>
> > >>>>>>>>> it's imaging is about 12 seconds.Shouldn't that be at least 40
>
> > >>>>>>>>> seconds
>
> > >>>>>>>>> to allow the dome delay and settle times to happen?What am I
>
> > >>>>>>>>> misunderstanding?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> The dome controller and ASCOM driver do handle Slewing property
>
> > >>>>>>>>> correctly, returning TRUE from the time that the
> slewToAzimuth() is
>
> > >>>>>>>>> issued until the dome is stopped at the requested position,
> then
>
> > >>>>>>>>> returning FALSE until the next slew is issuedSometimes,
>
> > >>>>>>>>> DeviceHub or
>
> > >>>>>>>>> SGP will end up issuing more than one slew to get the dome
> to the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> final
>
> > >>>>>>>>> position.The slaving software notices that the telescope has
>
> > >>>>>>>>> moved and
>
> > >>>>>>>>> starts an azimuth slew to where is while the telescope is still
>
> > >>>>>>>>> moving.
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Once the dome arrives at that position, another azimuth slew to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> get to
>
> > >>>>>>>>> where the telescope finally stopped.Last night, the longest
> time
>
> > >>>>>>>>> that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> such multiple slews took was about 20 seconds.That is why I
> set the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> "Delay before starting dome slew checking" to 30 seconds. I
> though
>
> > >>>>>>>>> that
>
> > >>>>>>>>> would make APPM not even check for a dome slew until the
> dome was in
>
> > >>>>>>>>> place and had stopped moving.Instead, it seemed to have made no
>
> > >>>>>>>>> difference: the imaging started almost as soon as the telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>> arrived
>
> > >>>>>>>>> at its position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> On 2/27/2021 10:06 AM, Ray Gralak wrote:
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Hi Shane,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> APPM's "Active mode" sends the telescope's destination
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> coordinates to the dome ASCOM driver. In this
>
> > >>>>>>>>> case, it is the responsibility of the driver or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>> application to translate the RA/Dec coordinates to
>
> > >>>>>>> the
>
> > >>>>>>>>> appropriate dome position.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> In "Passive mode" APPM waits for the dome to finish slewing by
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> polling the dome's driver (or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>> application).
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> So, it seems that your dome's ascom driver (or intermediate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> application) may not be correctly indicating
>
> > >>>>>>> when
>
> > >>>>>>>>> the dome is slewing.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>> -Ray
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Behalf Of Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Sent: Friday, February 26, 2021 9:19 PM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: [ap-gto] APPM with Dome Questions
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hi gang,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I am the proud owner of a brand new (well 2 weeks) Mach2 and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> tried to do
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> my first APPM model tonight.I'm having problems with the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> control
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and hope someone can point in the right direction.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> My observatory is a ClearSkys (I don't think they are around
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anymore) 8
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> ft dome.The pier is centered and the bottom of the mount is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> just about
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> even with the bottom of the dome.The rotation control is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> homemade (my
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> COVID quarantine project) and works very will with both ASCOM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> DeviceHub
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> and SGP.I'm using SGP for image capture and plate solve.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I can't figure out how to set up APPM to control the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> properly. If I
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> use "Active" in the "AP Point Mapper - Dome Settings" panel,
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> APPM seems
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> to do it's calculations based on the center of the dome
> instead
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of where
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the telescope is.This is not surprising since I can't seem to
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> find any
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> where in the program or the documentation to set the
> mount and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> telescope
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> geometry.I suppose, since APCC knows that I'm using a
> Mach2, it
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> _could_ already know roughly how far from the center of the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> RA/DEC axes
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> intersection the bottom of my telescope is.But I don't see
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anyway that
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> it could know where the center of my OTA is.I really don't
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> think it's
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> using the parameters from 3D view; I haven't set that up,
> but the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> default is a much larger diameter telescope than mine.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>Anyway, when I use "Active", I end up imaging across the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> edge of the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> slot because the slot is positioned for the center of the
> mount
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> instead
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> of where the telescope is.Most of the images ended up plate
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> solving
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> anyway, but sincethe stars are all diffraction spikes, I
> don't
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> know
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the quality of those solutions.The initial slew to
> meridian is
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> probably the worst because the dome is in the exact opposite
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> position
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> than it should be and my slot just goes barely past
> vertical.I
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> checked the ASCOM logs on the PC and my ASCOM debug screen on
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> controller.The dome _is_ slewing to the position that APPM
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> requests;
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that position just doesn't seem to be based on where the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> telescope is.
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Can anyone tell me what I'm missing?Where do I enter the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> offsets for
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the mount/scope geometer so that APPM can got to the correct
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> position?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> So, after trying "Active", I swiched to "Passive" and
> tried with
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> two
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> different dome slaving programs: ASCOM Device Hub and SGP.For
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> "Delay
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> before starting dome slew checking", I used values
> ranging from
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 5 to 30
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> seconds.For "Settle time after dome stops slewing", I used
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> values from
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> 1 to 20 seconds.I didn't see any effect when changing these
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> settings;
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in all cases the the telescope slewed to the next
> position and
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> started
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> imaging a few seconds after it got there--many seconds before
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> the dome
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> was in position.None of those images solved since the
> dome was
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> in the
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> way.Again, I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong--it's like
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm not
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> even changing the values.Is there another setting that I'm
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> missing
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> that enables these timeouts?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> I'm sure someone else has successfully done an APPM run
> from an
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> automated dome!What am I missing?
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks - Shane
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>> --
>
> > >>>>>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>>>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>>>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>>>>
>
> > >>>> --
>
> > >>>> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >>>> kor@...
>
> > >>>> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >>>
>
> > >> --
>
> > >> Shane Ramotowski
>
> > >> kor@...
>
> > >> https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >>
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> > >
>
> >
>
> > --
>
> > Shane Ramotowski
>
> > kor@...
>
> > https://www.kor-astro.net
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
> >
>
>

--
Shane Ramotowski
kor@...
https://www.kor-astro.net









Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Keith Egger
 

Ah, then maybe it just needs a re-greasing.

thanks, Keith


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Konstantin von Poschinger
 

Hi,

the Mach1 has no nylon clutch plugs!

Grüsse

Konstantin v. Poschinger


Hammerichstr. 5
22605 Hamburg
040/8805747
0171/1983476

Am 04.03.2021 um 13:58 schrieb Keith Egger <eggerk@...>:

The RA axis on my Mach1GTO (104xx series) is getting quite sticky in RA. I've searched and found reference to the nylon clutch plugs sticking (not sure it applies to this mount) and reference to documentation on the website as to how to fix. I can't find such documentation on the webpage. Can someone point me in the right direction?

It's also about time for a re-grease of the mount. I have some AeroShell #33 grease (the blue-green kind, without sulfur) but there is reference to two kinds of grease and to detailed instructions which again I have been unable to locate on the webpage.

thanks


Re: Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Sébastien Doré
 

Hi Keith,

The documentation page for legacy AP product might help if you haven't looked up : https://www.astro-physics.info/tech_support/tech_support_legacy.htm

Clear skies,
Sébastien

De : main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> de la part de Keith Egger <eggerk@...>
Envoyé : 4 mars 2021 07:57
À : main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>
Objet : [ap-gto] Mach1GTO RA axis sticking
 
The RA axis on my Mach1GTO (104xx series) is getting quite sticky in RA. I've searched and found reference to the nylon clutch plugs sticking (not sure it applies to this mount) and reference to documentation on the website as to how to fix. I can't find such documentation on the webpage. Can someone point me in the right direction?

It's also about time for a re-grease of the mount. I have some AeroShell #33 grease (the blue-green kind, without sulfur) but there is reference to two kinds of grease and to detailed instructions which again I have been unable to locate on the webpage.

thanks


Mach1GTO RA axis sticking

Keith Egger
 

The RA axis on my Mach1GTO (104xx series) is getting quite sticky in RA. I've searched and found reference to the nylon clutch plugs sticking (not sure it applies to this mount) and reference to documentation on the website as to how to fix. I can't find such documentation on the webpage. Can someone point me in the right direction?

It's also about time for a re-grease of the mount. I have some AeroShell #33 grease (the blue-green kind, without sulfur) but there is reference to two kinds of grease and to detailed instructions which again I have been unable to locate on the webpage.

thanks


Re: Problem with first startup of Mach2 -- obstruction / grinding sound

Terri Zittritsch
 

Hi Marty,
The first thing I ran into that flipped me out a bit is what happens when the clutches are loose.   I could not reliably hand tighten enough and need to use an allen wrench to snug them up (just a bit).
As I recall I had noise and stoppage ensued.   I also saw some messages in APCC.      

Terri


Re: Small mount was Recent encoder discussion on CN

Vito Rotondi
 

I checked out the Rainbow Astro 135. Its pretty sweet, considering the load capacity and the weight of the mount. Its definitely portable and affordable.


Re: Firmware Update Password

Roland Christen
 

Marj will send you the password.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: W Hilmo <y.groups@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Wed, Mar 3, 2021 6:07 pm
Subject: [ap-gto] Firmware Update Password

We have the first clear night that we've had in a while.  I noticed that APCC had been updated, so I installed it.

When I started the latest version, it flagged my CP4 firmware as out of date.  I would like to update it, but don't remember the credentials to download it.  George has sent it to me in the past, but I have somehow lost it.

I called Astro-Physics, but got the answering machine.  I suspect that it's already after hours there.

I would appreciate it if anyone from Astro-Physics sees this, that they could send it to me.

Thanks,
-Wade

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics


Re: Firmware Update Password

W Hilmo
 

And I’ve got it.

 

Thanks!

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> On Behalf Of W Hilmo
Sent: Wednesday, March 3, 2021 4:08 PM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: [ap-gto] Firmware Update Password

 

We have the first clear night that we've had in a while.  I noticed that APCC had been updated, so I installed it.

When I started the latest version, it flagged my CP4 firmware as out of date.  I would like to update it, but don't remember the credentials to download it.  George has sent it to me in the past, but I have somehow lost it.

I called Astro-Physics, but got the answering machine.  I suspect that it's already after hours there.

I would appreciate it if anyone from Astro-Physics sees this, that they could send it to me.

Thanks,
-Wade


Firmware Update Password

W Hilmo
 

We have the first clear night that we've had in a while.  I noticed that APCC had been updated, so I installed it.

When I started the latest version, it flagged my CP4 firmware as out of date.  I would like to update it, but don't remember the credentials to download it.  George has sent it to me in the past, but I have somehow lost it.

I called Astro-Physics, but got the answering machine.  I suspect that it's already after hours there.

I would appreciate it if anyone from Astro-Physics sees this, that they could send it to me.

Thanks,
-Wade


Re: Problem with first startup of Mach2 -- obstruction / grinding sound

mjb87@...
 
Edited

Tried to send you my email address. Maybe this third try will go through.

Speed doesn't affect it. I'm hearing the grinding noise at all speeds: 64x to 1200x.

Running v1.8.8.17 of APCC Pro. (Downloaded it today.) 


Re: Problem with first startup of Mach2 -- obstruction / grinding sound

Roland Christen
 

Try running at a lower slew rate, 600x and 1000x. If it works without stopping then that's a clue for me.

I can work with you more effectively if you send me your e-mail address.

Rolando



-----Original Message-----
From: mjb87 via groups.io <mjb87@...>
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Sent: Wed, Mar 3, 2021 11:55 am
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Problem with first startup of Mach2 -- obstruction / grinding sound

I've installed APCC Pro. Daleen was kind enough to resend me the license key. The software is up and running. I notice that it thought I was using my 1100 and wonder if I still have deleted the earlier data.

The Dec axis works fine -- no issues. The RA axis hits the stop (sort of a "raspberry" sound) as it starts to move west from Park 3. Moving east is fine -- only happens when I move west.  However, if I then release the clutches and move the mount, say, 15 degrees further west, it "moves" the point at which the conflict occurs further along. I've done that repeatedly and can now move the mount from counterweight bar up on one side to counterweight bar up on the other. I still get the conflict but it is now at a point where I don't plan to send the mount.

--
Roland Christen
Astro-Physics

10161 - 10180 of 86825