Date   

Comm Error APCC Pro

Matthew Hughes
 

Hi everyone,

All of a sudden I am getting COMM ERRORS when I start up APCC Pro. The mount won’t move. I can park and I park however.



I was running ASCOM 6.4 and then updated to 6.5 SP1. Getting errors on both versions.
GTOCP4
I have VCP4-P01-13 Firmware
Encoder A01-13
V1.8.7.1
ASCOM 6.5 SP1 6.5.1.3174 but same issue with 6.4

Log files.



Issue two is a common one that I hear about on this forum. My default slew speed in APCC Pro is 1200x I can’t seem to set it to 600x.

Any support would be appreciated.

Matt Hughes


Re: guiding min/max question

Don Anderson
 

Hello Richar
I use the 50mm Borg and an SX LodestarX2. I image and guide with MaximDL 6.11 and use the default settings (Min .0 /Max 2.0 on X & Y, Aggressiveness 8 both axis).
Works flawlessly. I image from a large city with severe light pollution so do mostly narrow band. Seeing is poor most of the time. I get round but often bloated stars which I attribute to the poor seeing. 

Don Anderson


On Saturday, November 7, 2020, 08:21:14 a.m. MST, richard payne <rpayne85392@...> wrote:


Hi, I have a simple question, first I have a 11000 mount, guiding with a 50mm f5 Borg
and a Starlight Express Costar.  Using either the Sky X or Maxim   for camera control,
if anyone is using something close what are your min/ max settings and aggressive #'s?
I understand seeing affects everything just curious to what others are using.  I have tried
several different numbers .02/.2 min/ max to higher numbers. Thanks
Richard


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Dale Ghent
 

On Nov 7, 2020, at 8:56 AM, Terri Zittritsch <theresamarie11@gmail.com> wrote:

Dale, thank you for the detailed and thoughtful response and information... like you, the focuser is my biggest concern, second is dew control. I like the Dew Busters capability and will have to take a look at the manual for the Pegasus.
The auto-dew feature on the UPBv2 is a bit ham-fisted at the moment, but it will get some improvements according to Evan of Pegasus.

I was also contemplating a Dew Buster as well before getting this, with the Dew Buster's auto-dew logic and that it places thermocouples up where the dew straps are to take the OTA temperatures and base its power level on that. The UPBv2 is different in that it has its own temperature+humidity sensor but it's not near the optics (although you can place it wherever its length of cable allows you); it's very much reflective of the ambient air around the OTA, not the temperature /of/ the OTA.

But really, in the end that doesn't seem to matter. The UPBv2 seems to ramp up the dew strap power output early enough such that dewing has never been a problem. Like I mentioned before, I'll set my rig up in the afternoon and just let it chill until it's time to start imaging later in the night. I just set the auto-dew to on and go about my day, have dinner, play with the kid, wrestle him to bed, clean up, and finally when it's astro-dark and I can turn my attention back to imaging, the dew heaters are already on with power output in accordance with the how close ambient temperature is to converging with the dewpoint.

I say it's ham-fisted in that it's very coarse in its incremental ramp up, and it seems sometimes that it will ramp up too fast and drive the dew straps at higher outputs that is really necessary for the conditions. One tactic is to let it auto-dew early in the evening, then turn the feature off and manually set the power output for each strap in accordance with your own intuition. The next version of the UPBv2 control app will have a new "Auto-Dew Aggressiveness" setting which will let you control this more. It's already available in an update to their smaller PPA product, and Evan at Pegasus says that it'll appear in a UPBv2 update soon as well. For what it's worth, I use Dew-Not and Kendrick straps, and the dewing levels I experience are typical of what you'd find in a mid-Atlantic suburban environment.

/dale


guiding min/max question

richard payne
 

Hi, I have a simple question, first I have a 11000 mount, guiding with a 50mm f5 Borg
and a Starlight Express Costar.  Using either the Sky X or Maxim   for camera control,
if anyone is using something close what are your min/ max settings and aggressive #'s?
I understand seeing affects everything just curious to what others are using.  I have tried
several different numbers .02/.2 min/ max to higher numbers. Thanks
Richard


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Terri Zittritsch
 

Dale, thank you for the detailed and thoughtful response and information... like you, the focuser is my biggest concern, second is dew control.    I like the Dew Busters capability and will have to take a look at the manual for the Pegasus.

best,
Terri


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Terri Zittritsch
 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 04:49 PM, <alex@...> wrote:
Hi Terri,

Thanks for the info! I will also take a look at the printed stuff Dale pointed out.

To answer your question, yes, please enclose a pic if it is not too much trouble?

The pics from Dale and Bruce were very helpful.

Best,
Alex
Hi Axel, you should be able to see it here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1jQXRltbI9mJDYR5YmSh3fTPXKPKJgC7X/view?usp=drivesdk

I've had the MDS dovetail on the top of all of my scopes for years, it's light and it allows me to add my larger guide scope, with MDS clamps, to any scope.   With the advent of smaller guidescopes and small pixel guide cameras, I use a small, focuser mounted,  60mm guidescope for many of the smaller scopes now, but still have a need for the larger guide scope, which keeps me from implementing a general solution of all top mounted accessories.  I really want '1' thing I can move from scope to scope.
This plate uses MDS clamps bolted to a piece of aluminum (1/8") which is overkill and adds about 15 ounces.    The bend in the plate is limited to my  largest diameter scope which is what it's on now, an 11" Edge.   On the plate are an 8 position powerpole strip, a focus boss ii (rugged but heavy), a reliable usb hub and a dew buster controller.     After reading Dale's post, I may take the plunge and give Pegasus a try.   Being an EE and 'tinkerer', it's kind of in my DNA.    The current setup is very reliable for me.. so reliability is important.    With the through mount cabling on the Mach2, the cables on the tele don't bother me so much.    This setup with the 11" is for planetary imaging and not deep sky imaging.. so nothing is really tied down very neatly right now and as long as it doesn't drag, i don't worry because I change scopes pretty often.



Terri


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Alex
 

Hi William,

I'm going to check out VHB.

Also, I ended up buying a a 3D plate from Joel. He had one in stock with the right hole locations. The plate it is light, strong enough to support my gear and highly affordable ($18). In addition, he sells thumb screws 1/4-20 for $2 to secure the plate to your rings.

Now, I just need to see when I can afford a UPBv2?

Best,
Alex


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

William L
 
Edited

Hah! I used 3M VHB (very high bonding)! That suckah ain’t going nowhere! After all, that’s what they use to attach architectural panels to the outside of skyscrapers!

 VHB™ Architectural Panel Tapes are commonly used in architectural panel applications. It reliably bonds a variety of materials with strength and speed for permanent applications. 3M™ VHB™ Architectural Panel Tapes utilize multi-purpose acrylic adhesive on both sides of a conformable, foam core.”
— 3M


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

William L
 

Why don’t you buy one from ADM Accessories (admaccessories.com)? He makes them himself, are high quality, and I think he’s got lots of stock (if not, he can make more)


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Alex
 

Hi Terri,

Thanks for the info! I will also take a look at the printed stuff Dale pointed out.

To answer your question, yes, please enclose a pic if it is not too much trouble?

The pics from Dale and Bruce were very helpful.

Best,
Alex


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Alex
 

Hi Ron,

Thanks for the link to the Celestron plate on Amazon. Right now, the link leads to a Amazon page with the Celestron Universal Mounting plate but it mentions the plate is currently unavailable. Later, I will check out the Celestron store on Amazon and see if I can locate something similar that is in stock. 


Thanks,
Alex


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Alex
 

Hi Dale,

Like Brian, I was wondering about how well the built focus controller works versus the Boss II unit. It appears to work fine, which is making me seriously consider this path to minimize clutter.

Thanks for all of the info!

Alex 


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Alex
 

Hi Brian,

This is a impressive unit. I like the brackets for a Losmandy plate and the software interface, plus it can control my starlight focuser. My only issue is I already have some hardware I plan on using in my system like a USB hub, starlight boss II, rigrunner, etc. If I had seen this first, I might have gone for it. I might still, if I run into problems.

Thanks again,
Alex


Re: Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Dean Jacobsen
 

Thanks for the info Liam.  I appreciate the detailed reply.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image Gallery - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/ 
Amateur Radio Call Sign - W6DBJ


Re: Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

 

It really depends on your setup. If what you have works, there is very little compelling reason to change. Here is the change list from the release notes that users can be concerned with, from the release notes. Personally, I would update because I know what a pain it is to support software when everyone uses outdated versions. For users, there have been some quality of life improvements and some very minor updates to precession precision. Since there is a clean revision to the 6.4 platform, I don’t think there is any significant harm.

Changes for Everyone

  • Device Hub
    • Side Of Pier and Destination Side Of Pier will now be calculated by Device Hub if not available from the downstream driver.
    • The dome shutter can now be opened and closed when slaved.
    • Exceptions are now trapped and logged during dome slaving calculations.
  • All references to the Yahoo ASCOM Talk forum have been replaced with references to the new Groups.IO forum.
  • All links referencing the ascom-standards.org web site now use HTTPS instead of HTTP.
  • DeltaT predictions, good to December 2021, have been revised based on the latest IERS predictions.
  • The SOFA component has been updated to use the latest IAU 21st July 2020 - Version 16 SOFA release.
  • Chooser Properties Button - detailed failure information will now be provided if a driver does not connect correctly.

Platform Issues fixed

  • A serious bug was introduced in the Astrometry.Transform class during Platform 6.5 implementation, which prevented a single instance from being used for multiple transforms. The bug has been fixed and Transform now works as it did in Platform 6.4.
  • Clients will now see the correct type of NotImplementedException (PropertNotImplementedExceptiony or MethodNotImplementedException) when Alpaca devices report that a member is not implemented.
  • Diagnostics:
    • Now correctly reports the Windows 10 operating system version.
    • A rare exception that occurred when recursing registry keys has been fixed.
  • Corrected a typo on in the message given if a disconnect fails when using the Choose and Connect to Device form. Thanks Marco!
  • Platform installer:
    • Works properly on machines whose PC Name contains a space character.
    • Handles unregistering drivers more gracefully.
    • Checks that the Windows Task Scheduler is enabled before attempting to create the earth rotation data update scheduled task.
    • Sets the required registry Profile store ACL on every install rather than assuming that it is correctly set when upgrading from a previous Platform version. Access to the Profile store is confirmed after setting the ACL and any issues will be reported by the installer.
    • Now detects whether controlled folder access is enabled on the user's Documents folder and aborts installation in this scenario.
    • Removes simulator COM entries when uninstalled.
    • Provides clean reversion back to Platform 6.4.
  • Device Hub
    • Improved support for locales that use comma as the decimal separator.
    • Profile settings will now be preserved when upgrading.
    • SideofPier exceptions will now be forwarded to the client.
    • SlewDomeToAzimuth now responds with the correct exception if an invalid azimuth value is requested.
    • The telescope Slewing flag is now correctly maintained when the mount is pulse guiding.

Basically, update if any of this sounds important.

 

Liam

 

From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> On Behalf Of Brian Valente
Sent: Friday, November 6, 2020 11:53 AM
To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

 

>>> Is there a compelling reason why I should upgrade?  I am in the "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" camp.

 

no, not in my opinion

 

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:52 AM Dean Jacobsen <deanjacobsen@...> wrote:

My setup runs fine now with ASCOM 6.4 SP1 so I am reluctant to be an early adopter and lose imaging time if I can't get APPM/SGPro/PlateSolve2 to work.

Is there a compelling reason why I should upgrade?  I am in the "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" camp.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image Gallery - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/ 
Amateur Radio Call Sign - W6DBJ


 

--

Brian 

 

 

 

Brian Valente


Re: Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

 

>>> Is there a compelling reason why I should upgrade?  I am in the "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" camp.

no, not in my opinion

On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 9:52 AM Dean Jacobsen <deanjacobsen@...> wrote:
My setup runs fine now with ASCOM 6.4 SP1 so I am reluctant to be an early adopter and lose imaging time if I can't get APPM/SGPro/PlateSolve2 to work.

Is there a compelling reason why I should upgrade?  I am in the "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" camp.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image Gallery - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/ 
Amateur Radio Call Sign - W6DBJ



--
Brian 



Brian Valente


Re: Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

Dean Jacobsen
 

My setup runs fine now with ASCOM 6.4 SP1 so I am reluctant to be an early adopter and lose imaging time if I can't get APPM/SGPro/PlateSolve2 to work.

Is there a compelling reason why I should upgrade?  I am in the "if it isn't broken, then don't fix it" camp.
--
Dean Jacobsen
http://astrophoto.net/wp/
Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/
Astrobin Image Gallery - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/ 
Amateur Radio Call Sign - W6DBJ


Important Update from the ASCOM Initiative #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver

 

Good news, everyone! 

There is a new update from the ASCOM Initiative! Looks like the latest version fixes some of the bugs introduced with 6.5 that affect plate solving in APCC. Here are the details, straight from the source. 

Hi all,

We have just posted a release candidate for ASCOM Platform 6.5 Service Pack 1: https://github.com/ASCOMInitiative/ASCOMPlatform/releases. This addresses a serious bug in the Transform component that was introduced in the initial Platform 6.5 release and which is known to have manifested in the Astro-Physics driver and in the AstroTortilla application. Other drivers and applications may also have been impacted.

If you have installed the initial Platform 6.5 release, we strongly advise you to update to the service pack 1 release candidate.

If you have already installed an early beta version of the service pack 1 release, we also advise you to update to the release candidate because it includes further fixes and supports clean reversion to Platform 6.4 SP1 if required.

In addition to fixing the Transform bug, service pack 1 includes several Device Hub and installer fixes. The Platform releases link above contains a full list of changes.

The Platform and Developer Components installers have been submitted to VirusTotal and are passed by all major anti-virus scanners. SHA1 and SHA256 checksums are listed immediately above the installer executables in the releases link above.

Best wishes, Peter 

 

--
Liam Plybon
Astro-Physics


Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Ron Kramer
 

I buy the large Celestron plate off Amazon.  Best price/value I've found. 

https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B004KMFO14/ref=ppx_yo_dt_b_search_asin_title?ie=UTF8&psc=1


On Fri, Nov 6, 2020 at 11:03 AM Dale Ghent <daleg@...> wrote:


> On Nov 6, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Brian Valente <bvalente@...> wrote:
>
> Dale
>
> Just to clarify, you *did* switch to their stepper motor driver from the Optec?
>
> I have the UPBv2 but i haven't used that part of it. i haven't even considered switching to that because - like you - i really like the Optec driver and it's been error-free performance for years

Yep, I did the switch. The FocusBoss controller, as nice as it is, is no longer used. The UPBv2 drives the HSM35 motor now using a cable I made based on the pinouts provided by Pegasus. It works like a champ. I did not use the thermal compensation feature of the FocsusBoss controller and its ASCOM driver. If you do, you would have to give that up to use the UPBv2 to drive the motor. Since I have NINA trigger an automatic autofocus operation if the HFR has trended more than 10% from the previous AF operation, I never had a use for the temperature compensation feature of the FocusBoss anyway.

/dale







Re: Manage Cables Which Plate to Use for Top Mount Hardware?

Dale Ghent
 

On Nov 6, 2020, at 10:52 AM, Brian Valente <bvalente@gmail.com> wrote:

Dale

Just to clarify, you *did* switch to their stepper motor driver from the Optec?

I have the UPBv2 but i haven't used that part of it. i haven't even considered switching to that because - like you - i really like the Optec driver and it's been error-free performance for years
Yep, I did the switch. The FocusBoss controller, as nice as it is, is no longer used. The UPBv2 drives the HSM35 motor now using a cable I made based on the pinouts provided by Pegasus. It works like a champ. I did not use the thermal compensation feature of the FocsusBoss controller and its ASCOM driver. If you do, you would have to give that up to use the UPBv2 to drive the motor. Since I have NINA trigger an automatic autofocus operation if the HFR has trended more than 10% from the previous AF operation, I never had a use for the temperature compensation feature of the FocusBoss anyway.

/dale

9141 - 9160 of 83216