Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Roland Christen
Who makes this Powerbox2?
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: Dominique Durand via groups.io <dom33.durand@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Sent: Sat, May 23, 2020 12:27 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users Hello dan,
This is an element to take into account, but the powerbox is not a big computer and from what I see it does not really heat up. Dominique
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Dominique Durand
Hello dan,
This is an element to take into account, but the powerbox is not a big computer and from what I see it does not really heat up. Dominique
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
dan kowall
Hello Dominique, Congratulations on your purchase. Do you have any reservations about having the heat from your power box disturbing the air in front of your telescope's objective lens? dan kowall
On Friday, May 22, 2020, 06:32:41 PM EDT, Dominique Durand via groups.io <dom33.durand@...> wrote: [Edited Message Follows] Hi guys,Mach2 received Wednesday at the end of the afternoon, tested in the lounge on the Eagle tripod, then installed the same evening in my observatory. RAPAS to roughly align (then disassemble), then by drift with PHD2. No worries with the latest version of the driver and APCC-pro.I even started to see how to model, but little problems with APPM / SGP connection. The next day I found the solution: open SGP as administrator. So Thursday evening, first successful 35-point modeling after some "no solve" because Arcsec / pix badly configured.Then photo test (3x10 ') on M109 without apparent drift, but the passage of satellites and (2x5') on Spica where there was clearly still drift. I am now waiting for the least amount of clouds to redo a modeling with more points and then a verification.And I also fully understood that if I bought this frame it was to do without guidance.For information, I installed a powerbox v2, but under the DOVELM162 plate and at the front with a fixed wiring which allows it to stay in place in case of tube change. Dominique
|
|
Re: Mach2 transport case
Dominique Durand
Hi Dean,
My mach2 is scheduled to stay in the fixed position, because I have a mach1 for walking. For this mach1 I used the Geoptik bag (Red) provided for EQ6 and I installed part of the protections of the original packaging reworked there. The mach1 lodges in park3 with its plate and I lodge there also RAPAS Price / lightness + protection + unbeatable size. For the mach2 with the same frame it could certainly fit with only 49 to 51 lbs to carry. That is studied. Dominique
|
|
Mach2 transport case
Has any one found a Pelican case or similar transport case with the same inside dimensions as the Mach2 shipping box? I saw a suggestion in the manual that the shipping box's padding could be used in a transport case. That seemed like a good idea.
-- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: APCC Pro 1.8.1.1 update
#APCC
Ray Gralak
Hi Dominique,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
You may be looking at two different rate types: The fastest slew (Go To) rate is 1800x on the Mach 2. The fastest move (button) rate is 1200x on the Mach 2. -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center): https://www.astro-physics.com/apcc-pro Author of PEMPro V3: https://www.ccdware.com Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver: https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver
-----Original Message-----
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
OK, all is good. I hadn't found the internal RA axis hard stops yet and when unpacking I was wondering if I was "unwinding" the RA axis in the right direction.
-- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: APCC Pro 1.8.1.1 update
#APCC
Dominique Durand
Hi Ray,
I installed this latest APCC version. With the GTOCP5 no worries therefore. On the other hand I noticed that on the driver V2 the speed 1800x was referenced and therefore selectable while on APCC the maximum was 1200x. Dominique
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Dominique Durand
On Sat, May 23, 2020 at 06:40 AM, Dean Jacobsen wrote:
Is there anything to know about the internal cables to keep them from getting stressed, twisted or broken?Hi Dean, There are locking pins that prevent overpassing 180 ° East and west and north and south on the axes. It is rather outside that it happens, because you have to find the suitable cables or have connectors to make the DC cables for the arrival (bottom) and the output (Top) of the 12V.So in particular a specific power cable at the right length for the Powerbox as far as I am concerned. Dominique
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Is there anything to know about the internal cables to keep them from getting stressed, twisted or broken?
-- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Hi guys,
Mach2 received Wednesday at the end of the afternoon, tested in the lounge on the Eagle tripod, then installed the same evening in my observatory. RAPAS to roughly align (then disassemble), then by drift with PHD2. No worries with the latest version of the driver and APCC-pro.I even started to see how to model, but little problems with APPM / SGP connection. The next day I found the solution: open SGP as administrator. So Thursday evening, first successful 35-point modeling after some "no solve" because Arcsec / pix badly configured.Then photo test (3x10 ') on M109 without apparent drift, but the passage of satellites and (2x5') on Spica with very slight drift barely visible on these 5 'poses.. I am now waiting for the least amount of clouds to redo a modeling with more points and then a verification.And I also fully understood that if I bought this frame it was to do without guidance.For information, I installed a powerbox v2, but under the DOVELM162 plate and at the front with a fixed wiring which allows it to stay in place in case of tube change. Dominique
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Roland Christen
No bias on either axis. Balance the mount properly and it will guide very well.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Jacobsen <deanjacobsen@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io Sent: Fri, May 22, 2020 12:53 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users Sorry if this has come up before...
Is there any need to slightly bias the weight of the counterweights to any side of the mount with the Mach2? -- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: Any Tips From Experienced Mach2 Users
Sorry if this has come up before...
Is there any need to slightly bias the weight of the counterweights to any side of the mount with the Mach2? -- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image
I meant to say traveling imagers... at remote locations.
-- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: Mach2 keypad tests
Terri Zittritsch
On Thu, May 21, 2020 at 07:29 PM, uncarollo2 <chris1011@...> wrote:
Roland, ready and willing to do some testing. Terri
|
|
Re: Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image
The tests look great. This will be great for us remote imagers.
-- Dean Jacobsen http://astrophoto.net/wp/ Image Gallery - http://astrophoto.net/wp/image-gallery/ Astrobin - https://www.astrobin.com/users/deanjacobsen/
|
|
Re: [ap-ug] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image - Crop
Roland Christen
Let's see what size this comes back with ;^))
|
|
Re: [ap-ug] [ap-gto] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image
Roland Christen
Looks like the image got resized down to about 20% of what I posted. Will have to post it elsewhere at full res.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: thefamily90 Phillips <thefamily90@...> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>; main@ap-ug.groups.io <main@ap-ug.groups.io> Sent: Thu, May 21, 2020 6:59 pm Subject: Re: [ap-ug] [ap-gto] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of uncarollo2 <chris1011@...> via groups.io <chris1011@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:56:50 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>; main@ap-ug.groups.io <main@ap-ug.groups.io> Subject: [ap-gto] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image Hello some more ;^))
I took some 30 images over 3 hours almost continuously without touching the laptop, except to re-focus a couple of times. In the final stack i threw out 3 frames that had heavy satellite tracks (some right thru the central galaxy), and simply
combined the rest in MaximDL. The end result is not great as far as getting deep sky results because of my horrendous light pollution, but that's not what my goal was anyhow. The goal was whether i could achieve a high res image without guiding using a simple
keypad generated mount model. Below is a 50% size image which I am hoping doesn't exceed the max image size. Stars are round to approx .033 as measured by MaximDL, taken in 2 out of 5 seeing according to Clear Sky Clock. No field flattener, just straight out
of the 160 lens and onto the 8300 chip.
-- Jim Phillips
|
|
Re: [ap-ug] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image
Bill Long
Nicely done! 🙂
From: main@ap-ug.groups.io <main@ap-ug.groups.io> on behalf of Roland Christen via groups.io <chris1011@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 4:56 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>; main@ap-ug.groups.io <main@ap-ug.groups.io> Subject: [ap-ug] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image Hello some more ;^))
I took some 30 images over 3 hours almost continuously without touching the laptop, except to re-focus a couple of times. In the final stack i threw out 3 frames that had heavy satellite tracks (some right thru the central galaxy), and simply
combined the rest in MaximDL. The end result is not great as far as getting deep sky results because of my horrendous light pollution, but that's not what my goal was anyhow. The goal was whether i could achieve a high res image without guiding using a simple
keypad generated mount model. Below is a 50% size image which I am hoping doesn't exceed the max image size. Stars are round to approx .033 as measured by MaximDL, taken in 2 out of 5 seeing according to Clear Sky Clock. No field flattener, just straight out
of the 160 lens and onto the 8300 chip.
|
|
Re: Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image
thefamily90 Phillips
From: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io> on behalf of uncarollo2 <chris1011@...> via groups.io <chris1011@...>
Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2020 7:56:50 PM To: main@ap-gto.groups.io <main@ap-gto.groups.io>; main@ap-ug.groups.io <main@ap-ug.groups.io> Subject: [ap-gto] Mach2 Keypad tests .. final image Hello some more ;^))
I took some 30 images over 3 hours almost continuously without touching the laptop, except to re-focus a couple of times. In the final stack i threw out 3 frames that had heavy satellite tracks (some right thru the central galaxy), and simply
combined the rest in MaximDL. The end result is not great as far as getting deep sky results because of my horrendous light pollution, but that's not what my goal was anyhow. The goal was whether i could achieve a high res image without guiding using a simple
keypad generated mount model. Below is a 50% size image which I am hoping doesn't exceed the max image size. Stars are round to approx .033 as measured by MaximDL, taken in 2 out of 5 seeing according to Clear Sky Clock. No field flattener, just straight out
of the 160 lens and onto the 8300 chip.
|
|