Re: Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Rodolphe G.
Okay.
I found a "smart" workaround but using the bug to my benefit: I enter 65, save location, and it turns into 650, which is fine ;) The value no longer changes (as I don't have to save the location any further). To your question, Winver:
I tried reinstalling the ASCOM version (standard, not the EU specific one), same issue. Hope it helps.
|
|
Re: Full Field image ( New file uploaded to ap-ug )
mike.hambrick@...
There is a pattern of stars in the open
cluster that reminds me of M11 - The Wild Duck Cluster
Best Regards Michael Hambrick ARLANXEO TSR Global Manufacturing Support PO Box 2000 Orange, TX 77631-2000 Phone: +1 (409) 882-2799 email: mike.hambrick@...
|
|
Full Field image ( New file uploaded to ap-ug )
Roland Christen
Hi Astrofolks,
After playing around with the data George took with the 175 refractor and my data with the 155 and 180, I combined them to show a full field image at full resolution and a bit more color processing. We have the galaxy in the lower right, the compact open cluster in the upper left and a sprinkling of very bright blue and red stars over the whole field which look like they might be a large loose open cluster. Anyone know what they might be? Sprinkled among the field are a number of faint and very faint background galaxies.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: ap-ug To: ap-ug Sent: Wed, Aug 21, 2019 2:40 pm Subject: [ap-ug] New file uploaded to ap-ug Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ap-ug
group.
File : /Images taken on the AP Mach2 Mount/Fireworks Galaxy-LRGB-FullSize2.jpg
Uploaded by : uncarollo2 <chris1011@...>
Description : Full Field image of NGC6946, composite of 180F9 image and 175F5.8 image taken by R.Christen and George Whitney.
You can access this file at the URL:
To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
Regards,
uncarollo2 <chris1011@...>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the ap-ug list
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
|
|
Re: Fireworks Galaxywith 180F9 on Mach2 (New file uploaded to ap-ug)
Ben Koltenbah
Well, done, and I, too, like those colors. I'm working on a tighter Fireworks image taken with a C11 on "just an old AP 1100", and I'm hoping to achieve the same coloring as you did here. Ben
|
|
Re: Fireworks Galaxywith 180F9 on Mach2 (New file uploaded to ap-ug)
Terry Robison
Nice colours in that galaxy.
|
|
Fireworks Galaxywith 180F9 on Mach2 (New file uploaded to ap-ug)
Roland Christen
Hi Astronuts,
George and I had a couple of clear nights last week, although the Moon was up and almost full, which did affect our background sky. I imaged this galaxy and neighboring open cluster with a 180F9 refractor running at F7.2 (Quad TCC) in luminance, 10 x 10 minutes each. Meanwhile George got 6 x 10 minutes of RGB using his 175 refractor running at F5.6. I also had some Ha narrowband data of the galaxy taken with my 155 at F5.6 which I added to the mix. Even though we had almost full Moonlight, we recorded quite a number of faint galaxies in the background. It ain't the desert of Utah, but not bad for around here in light polluted suburbia.
The exercise of course was to run the Mach2 at full load and beyond and see how well it guides. And it does guide superbly. Typical rms guiding accuracy was 0.2 arc sec and less, all night long with that long refractor and its quite significant moment arm.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: ap-ug To: ap-ug Sent: Tue, Aug 20, 2019 1:58 pm Subject: [ap-ug] New file uploaded to ap-ug Hello,
This email message is a notification to let you know that
a file has been uploaded to the Files area of the ap-ug
group.
File : /Images taken on the AP Mach2 Mount/Fireworks Galaxy-3.jpg
Uploaded by : uncarollo2 <chris1011@...>
Description : NGC6946 Image taken on the Mach2 mount with: Luminance - AP 180F9 refractor QuadTCC, RGB - AP175 QuadTCC, Ha - AP155 QuadTCC.
You can access this file at the URL:
To learn more about file sharing for your group, please visit:
Regards,
uncarollo2 <chris1011@...>
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the ap-ug list
------------------------------------
Yahoo Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
<*> Your use of Yahoo Groups is subject to:
|
|
COMs Issue in APCC
Steve Reilly
When I woke up this morning I found my roof open and mount pointing in the NW. This was well past the time the shutdown script should have run in ACP. The clock in ACP’s console showed 5:18:48, not running, and everything connected. So I looked to make sure APCC was up and running as it was. I did see that there had been some COM errors but they started at 07:04:26 and the last entry was at 08:24:02. I took screen captures of both the full screen with ACP and the programs running. The camera, rotator, mount, and focuser were all still connected. The mount, an AP1200GTO is still using the CP3 with current firmware and ASCOM driver. Concerned about the chance of storms I needed/wanted the telescope parked (Park 4) and roof closed. I used the Telescope park command in ACP to park the mount which responded as expected, parked the mount, and then closed the roof as it’s configured to do on Park. The telescope position in ACP never changed, in fact it still shows RA:23:02:33.9 and DEC:+58 18’ 21” and the time of 05:18:48. The shutdown script is loaded but hitting the Run button does nothing. I’ve left the system running short of parking the mount, closing the roof, warming the sensor, shutting down the camera (it’s 98.2 degrees outside) but now after talking to Bob he said ACP is waiting on some communication……
None of this makes sense to me but that’s what’s happened. I have had ACP “wait” for park long after the scope had parked and when I opened the ASCOM Driver and parked the mount again ACP finally responded. This wasn’t the case here as the shutdown observatory script hadn’t even run although it was posed to. I ended just closing everything and rebooting…..till maybe next time.
Anyone have an experience such as this? This is a Windows 7 64 bit system fully updated. Typically the system runs extremely well. Whether it’s a timing thing or a COMs ting I have no clue but would like to be able to determine if there’s a way. Here are two screen captures from this morning. https://www.astral-imaging.com/ACP-Screen%20Captures%208-19-2019.html
-Steve
|
|
Re: Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Ray Gralak
Forgot to mention that I actually tried 645 and 645,0.Did you have a chance to try the other two suggestions I made? That is: 1. Changing the Decimal symbol to "." in Windows regional settings. 2. Using Windows update to make sure you have the latest updates. BTW, which version of Windows 10 are you using? You can find out by typing "winver" from the Windows 10 search box. -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center): http://www.astro-physics.com/index.htm?products/accessories/software/apcc/apcc Author of PEMPro V3: https://www.ccdware.com Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver: https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver -----Original Message-----
|
|
Re: Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Rodolphe G.
Forgot to mention that I actually tried 645 and 645,0.
Both variations fail.
|
|
Re: Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Rodolphe G.
Hi Ray
Thanks for the suggestion. I already tried 645,0 and it didn't work either. But will try changing the locale settings. I'm on the latest w10 release. I'll report here about the results. Thanks
|
|
Re: setting APCC Pro Meridian delay
Ray Gralak
Hi Dave,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
APCC's meridian limit can stop tracking or park the mount when the limit is reached. This is independent of the meridian delay, which sets the mount's flip point. You can enable meridian limits without having APCC change the mount's flip point (meridian delay) by not enabling Counterweight up Slews within "East Limits" and "West Limits" on APCC's "Meridian" tab. -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center): http://www.astro-physics.com/index.htm?products/accessories/software/apcc/apcc Author of PEMPro V3: https://www.ccdware.com Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver: https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver
-----Original Message-----
|
|
setting APCC Pro Meridian delay
david w pearson
I have a remote setup with my ap1200 with APCC pro. I am trying to set up protection for a meridian flip that does not occur from a script stoppage (this happened last night for the first time in 5 months). Currently the script is set to do a meridian flip upon crossing the meridian and completion of the current exposure. i have had the script stop after the meridian flip and was saved by the APCC Pro horizon limit. In reading the APCC pro manual, I can not find any direct discussion on this type of protection. but it appears that if i set the meridian delay to a negative number, say -0.4 for a 24 minute delay in the meridian flip and select the result as "park mount" this would provide the protection i desire. Have I interpreted the manual correctly, 1) negative sign, 2) In another part of the meridian manual section, it recommends not using the meridian limits if remote. Implementing only a meridian delay seems like it would be safe for remote....do you agree? thanks dave
|
|
Re: Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Ray Gralak
* Country: SwitzerlandAre you entering the elevation as "645,0"? If so try reentering the elevation without a comma. If that doesn't help then if you change the Decimal symbol to "." does the problem go away? If so, it could be a bug in the way Windows wants to interpret a value in your regional setting. Maybe try using Windows update to make sure you have the latest updates. -Ray Gralak Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center): http://www.astro-physics.com/index.htm?products/accessories/software/apcc/apcc Author of PEMPro V3: https://www.ccdware.com Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver: https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver -----Original Message-----
|
|
Ascom 6 / Saving Elevation setting: Weird behavior
Rodolphe G.
Hello I'm really new to this group, so please pardon my ignorance if this topic has already been addressed (I did search the forum before posting). I was fortunate enough to acquire a second hand Mach1 + CP4 lately, and I'm absolutely delighted by the mount I face a small issue with the ASCOM driver (using the latest version: 5.20.09, firmware VCP4-P01-13), though:
Am I doing anything wrong? My setup, just in case there could be an influence: Running Win10, EN-US version, located in Switzerland. Locale settings:
Thanks in advance for any suggestion/help. Regards Rodolphe
|
|
Re: When will Mach2 available to order?
Thank you, Marj. :)
|
|
Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features
Bill Long
PEMPro. Problem solved.
From: ap-gto@... on behalf of jim phillips thefamily90@... [ap-gto]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 6:39 PM To: ap-gto@... Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features And not being able to even see the North Star from 2of 3 of my observing sites has always made polar alignment a pain.
Jim
Get
Outlook for iOS
From: ap-gto@... on behalf
of marfig1970@... [ap-gto]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 8:21:31 PM To: ap-gto@... Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features Wow, that looks fantastic. I hope to be able to buy one from the next production.
Congratulations!
(I guess the only thing that it can't do is polar alignment by itself :D
![]()
|
|
Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features
thefamily90 Phillips
And not being able to even see the North Star from 2of 3 of my observing sites has always made polar alignment a pain.
Jim
Get Outlook for iOS
From: ap-gto@... on behalf of marfig1970@... [ap-gto]
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2019 8:21:31 PM To: ap-gto@... Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features Wow, that looks fantastic. I hope to be able to buy one from the next production.
Congratulations!
(I guess the only thing that it can't do is polar alignment by itself :D
![]()
|
|
Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features
Eric Dreher
Roland, whether or not this is true, I read somewhere that the modeling to be in the CP5 will eventually find its way into the CP4 firmware. Is this true?
Eric ---In ap-gto@..., <chris1011@...> wrote : I like the $7,500 number that was thrown around early in the development of the M2. That would put a lot of pressure on some of the high-end competition. I like that too, we were hoping to be competitive with imported stuff. But look what happened meanwhile. 25% tariffs hit us big time. Our mounts use a lot of stainless steel and aluminum and it increased our metal prices. On top of that, we import lots of small components like bearings, gears, electronic components, servo motors, etc that are not manufactured in the US. These all got hit by 25%. Even the parts that we get made here have upped in price because they can (import prices are up so they raised theirs too). The worst part of this deal is that the foreign mount manufacturers don't pay the increased prices for their components, so they get cheaper prices for alu, steel, etc. AND finally, when the Chinese mounts are exported to the US, there is no additional 25% tariff on them. Finished mounts and telescopes have no tariff imposed, just components are hit. It was done so on purpose so that consumers wouldn't be suddenly hit by higher prices for their toys. We, like the farmers, are getting squeezed. I am very much hoping that Marj can bring this mount in under the proverbial wire, cost wise. Rolando -----Original Message----- From: mogollonobs@... [ap-gto] <ap-gto@...> To: ap-gto <ap-gto@...> Sent: Sat, Aug 17, 2019 6:43 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Mach2 update and discussion of features I like the $7,500 number that was thrown around early in the development of the M2. That would put a lot of pressure on some of the high-end competition. I also realize that, I would prefer Rolando controlling the calculator, but I think Marj is the one pushing those buttons.;-) Thanks for the update and it sounds like a fantastic mount! Keith
|
|
Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features
Marcelo Figueroa
Wow, that looks fantastic. I hope to be able to buy one from the next production. Congratulations! (I guess the only thing that it can't do is polar alignment by itself :D ![]()
|
|
Re: Mach2 update and discussion of features
Roland Christen
Will the CP5 and Mach2 have software compensation for OTA orthogonally error without needing APCC-Pro? It will be in the revised keypad software. We will also have modeling in the CP5.
Rolando
-----Original Message-----
From: Christopher Erickson christopher.k.erickson@... [ap-gto] <ap-gto@...> To: ap-gto Sent: Sat, Aug 17, 2019 6:44 pm Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Mach2 update and discussion of features Will the CP5 and Mach2 have software compensation for OTA orthogonally error without needing APCC-Pro?
|
|