Re: MaximDL Autoguiding
John Winfield
Yep - that works fine for me - set the "guiding via" in Maxim to
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
"Telescope" John
--- In ap-gto@..., "hewholooks" <hewholooks@...> wrote:
|
|
Re: Retirement pain, 400 GTO, KD chip, firmware 4.12
Hello Mr. Lombardo,
It may be that the wrong chip was installed in your GTOCP2 control box. There are two versions that are used in 400GTO's and 600EGTO's depending on the gear reduction that is used on the motors. The versions with "K" in front of the version letter (i.e. "KD) are for units that employ 32:1 gearboxes, while the chips that have a version letter that is not preceded by a "K" are for units with 19:1 gearboxes. The two versions are NOT interchangeable, and using the wrong chip will cause the problem you are describing. Mag. 7 skies! Howard Hedlund Astro-Physics, Inc. 815-282-1513 ________________________________ From: ap-gto@... [mailto:ap-gto@...] On Behalf Of bill_lombardo_bill Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2008 8:03 AM To: ap-gto@... Subject: [ap-gto] Retirement pain, 400 GTO, KD chip, firmware 4.12 I purchased a 400 GTO in 2000 with firmware 2.6, but I didn't make any practical use of it until now, as I reached retirement and I have time. Last week I upgraded chip in GTOCP2 and keypad software to firmware 4.12 with the help of an expert (of the italian AP representative UNITRON). Apparently everything is in order: keypad say "all systems go", latitude N 45:39:58 ; longitude E 8:58:46 Time zone:01, local sidereal time, AP 400, are correctly entered and correctly displayed in Keypad. Database objects in Keypad are not corrupted (I changed battery in time). But: 1) If I put the mount in Park 1 position and I pass to Park2 or Park3, these last positions are not reached (and vice-versa). No way to simulate Polar alignment in daytime. 2) If I point a star in the East near meridian with the mount in West, and I change the Meridian delay function, when I slew again to the same star the mount tries to reach the star on the other side of the mount but points toward another direction. Is it me or my mount which needs urgent help or cure? PS When I had firmware 2.6, two or three times I set outside the mount, without checking parking positions,and apparently the mount correctly slewed to stars and planets.
|
|
Re: Measure rate in PulseGuide
Ray Gralak <rgr@...>
Hi Pierre,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
In the GTOCP3 mounts, which is what I believe you have, PulseGuide directly sets the rate value you enter into the RA and Dec rate command registers. A positive RA rate value means the mount will move faster than sidereal (west), but doing so _decreases_ the RA to which the scope is pointing. So if you are using plate solves the delta RA distance must be calculated by subtracting the ending RA from the starting RA (so , for example, going west would result in a positive value). Also the rate is in arc-sec/sec so 10 arc-secs in RA is really 150 arc-sec (15x10). -Ray
-----Original Message-----
|
|
MaximDL Autoguiding
hewholooks
I probably already asked this, but it's all a blur.
When guiding with MaximDL, can the softare guide through the serial ports on the AP mount or must you use something like a shoestring adapter and actually use the autoguider port? There will be no direct connection from the guidecam to the mount, but the connection will be from the computer's usb port, through a usb/serial interface adapter, then to one of the serial ports on the mount. I assume this will be working through the AP ASCOM driver. Hunter
|
|
Retirement pain, 400 GTO, KD chip, firmware 4.12
bill_lombardo_bill
I purchased a 400 GTO in 2000 with firmware 2.6, but I didn't make any
practical use of it until now, as I reached retirement and I have time. Last week I upgraded chip in GTOCP2 and keypad software to firmware 4.12 with the help of an expert (of the italian AP representative UNITRON). Apparently everything is in order: keypad say "all systems go", latitude N 45:39:58 ; longitude E 8:58:46 Time zone:01, local sidereal time, AP 400, are correctly entered and correctly displayed in Keypad. Database objects in Keypad are not corrupted (I changed battery in time). But: 1) If I put the mount in Park 1 position and I pass to Park2 or Park3, these last positions are not reached (and vice-versa). No way to simulate Polar alignment in daytime. 2) If I point a star in the East near meridian with the mount in West, and I change the Meridian delay function, when I slew again to the same star the mount tries to reach the star on the other side of the mount but points toward another direction. Is it me or my mount which needs urgent help or cure? PS When I had firmware 2.6, two or three times I set outside the mount, without checking parking positions,and apparently the mount correctly slewed to stars and planets.
|
|
Re: AP 1200 GTO
Julien Bruyland
Thanks for the reply.
Below a short description of my handling and what happens: a.. When I power up the mount, the keypad displays the main menu,and it briefly flash the phrase "Astro-Physics version 4.12" before proceeding to the main menu. b.. The main menu is NOTdisplayed correctly as in the lower left corner of page 106 of the keypad manual. There is missing information for the imput numbers 5;6;7and 8.(this values are blank instead of containing an appropriate value.) c.. Then I press 2 to enter the setup menu. d.. The setup menu display correctly as shown at the top of page 107. e.. Then I press 3 to enter the keypad options menu. f.. The keypad options menu display is NOT correctly as shown on the left side of page 108. The top line on the screen should read: 1=Auto-Connect:YES It don't show a value of either: NO , YES , or EXT and is empty. Pressing the "1" key ,I cannot toggle among the three choices. g.. From: chris1011@... To: ap-gto@... Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [ap-gto] AP 1200 GTO In a message dated 2/13/2008 8:24:55 AM Central Standard Time, julien@... writes: > Hi, > I bought a new AP 1200GTO with GTOCP3(version 4.12). > The Auto-connect function is set from the factory to"yes".I cann't change > the "auto-connect" function to "no" or to "ext"; even there is nothing > filled,it's stay "blank.Normally you have to push "1"and it have to scroll,but > nothing happens.Even most of the other functions I cann't fill (Locations& > Time;Mount type....). Post some pictures of the setup screen on your keypad so we can figure out what you mean. Rolando ************** The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. Go to AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565)
|
|
Measure rate in PulseGuide
Pierre Henrotay
Dear,
(this one essentially for Ray I'm afraid) if my understanding is correct, the "measure rate" computes the drift in RA and DEC over a time period. I am thinking of using plate solve to determine the coeffcients myself (or better said via a script in MaxIm), that is: - take exposure 1 - wait xx minutes - take exposure 2 - plate solve both and determine how far the center has moved (giving drift in RA and DEC in arcsec) - divide these figures by the time lapse in seconds Does this make sense or am I overlooking something ? If OK, is the drfit computed as from 1 to 2 or the reverse ? BTW, I confirm the behavior observed a few weeks ago: with my setup, I need to manually change the sign of RA and DEC rates (obtained via autoguider). I am using 1.34. Regards, Pierre
|
|
Azimuth and altitude adjusments on Mach1
Pierre Henrotay
Dear,
when adjusting altitude, I noticed that locking the altitude locking lever moves the star by about 1-2 arcminutes: I clearly see it on my CCD which I use for centering the star. The mount (Mach1) is balanced and by far not overloaded. In azimuth, I see also a (smaller) displacement effect when tightening the azimuth lock knobs. Maybe I am tightening too much ? Note that for altitude I am able to turn the adjustment knob evevn when the lever is locked - normal ? I'd welcome any suggestion and hint. Thanks ! Pierre
|
|
Re: PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Ray Gralak <rgr@...>
Any idea when it (AP Command Center) might be ready for prime time?It's hard to say for sure... it will be ready when it's ready. :-) Much of the user interface is done but the remaining details are likely going to be time consuming and I only usually get to work on it on weekends. The object library will be one of the last things put in (and so that hasn't been done yet). -Ray
|
|
Re: PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Dean S
Ok, Howard & Ray,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I am looking forward to it and will sit patiently and wait. Any idea when it might be ready for prime time? Thanks
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Gralak" <rgr@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 5:52 PM Subject: RE: [ap-gto] PulseGuide v1.36 is available Hi Dean,
|
|
Re: PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Ray Gralak <rgr@...>
Hi Dean,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I think you are thinking of the Astro-Physics Command Center, which is still in development. -Ray
-----Original Message-----
|
|
Re: PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Hello Dean,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
This is not the new Astro-Physics Command Center that Ray is still working on. It is instead a version of the same PulseGuide you have been using that addresses several issues primarily for southern hemisphere observers that needed to get fixed. Anyone in the southern hemisphere definitely needs to update to this version. There are also a few additional items that were improved or fixed that make it worthwhile for all of us in the north. Since the logic involved will also apply to the new Astro-Physics Command Center, there was every reason to go forward with the fixes even though PulseGuide is set to be replaced with Ray's new software when it is finished. Mag. 7 skies! Howard Hedlund Astro-Physics, Inc. 815-282-1513 ________________________________ From: ap-gto@... [mailto:ap-gto@...] On Behalf Of Dean S Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:40 PM To: ap-gto@... Subject: Re: [ap-gto] PulseGuide v1.36 is available Hi Ray, I thought the next version would have the object data base in it so it could be exactly like the handbox and I don't need a planetarium program? Thanks, Dean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Gralak" <rgr@... <mailto:rgr%40gralak.com> > To: <ap-gto@... <mailto:ap-gto%40yahoogroups.com> >; <ap-ug@... <mailto:ap-ug%40yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:44 PM Subject: [ap-gto] PulseGuide v1.36 is available Hello all,helped find a few Southern hemisphere bugs and a very subtle timing bug. Youcan download the new version and get a list of the new features/bug fixes<http://www.pulseguide.com/Installs/PulseGuide136.exe> PulseGuide, so<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ap-gto> Yahoo! Groups Links2/15/2008 9:00 AM
|
|
Re: PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Dean S
Hi Ray,
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
I thought the next version would have the object data base in it so it could be exactly like the handbox and I don't need a planetarium program? Thanks, Dean
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ray Gralak" <rgr@...> To: <ap-gto@...>; <ap-ug@...> Sent: Friday, February 15, 2008 4:44 PM Subject: [ap-gto] PulseGuide v1.36 is available Hello all,
|
|
PulseGuide v1.36 is available
Ray Gralak <rgr@...>
Hello all,
I am announcing the general availability of PulseGuide v1.36. I want to thank Howard at AP for helping test this new version. He helped find a few Southern hemisphere bugs and a very subtle timing bug. You can download the new version and get a list of the new features/bug fixes here: http://www.pulseguide.com Direct download of the update is here: http://www.pulseguide.com/Installs/PulseGuide136.exe NOTE: This version will not uninstall the previous version of PulseGuide, so you can use both versions interchangeably. Thanks, -Ray Gralak
|
|
Re: Cable issues
divenuts
Seems as though a couple different size tie wraps would work...that's what I use on my pier(and Velcro)
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Chuck/divenuts
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Winfield" <winfij@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 7:21 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Cable issues Would it be possible to get some other solution which didn't involve
|
|
Re: AP 900 problem
drgert1
Hi,
How much effort did you put into focusing? If the ST4 is not properly focused the guiding can be erratic. Clear Skies, Gert --- In ap-gto@..., Michael Cater <nitemike1@...> wrote: develops after a few minutes of guiding and then the accuracy drops off. I will try my friend's ST4 to see if the problem is duplicated; if his works then my ST4 is defective. it's almost definitely the ST4. It is either incorrectly set up or the cableTry it now.
|
|
Re: AP 900 problem
William R. Mattil <wrmattil@...>
Michael Cater wrote:
I have had no problem with the ST4 calibration mode. The problems develops after a few minutes of guiding and then the accuracy drops off. I will try my friend's ST4 to see if the problem is duplicated; if his works then my ST4 is defective.Mike, It is extremely doubtful that your ST-4 is defective. The scenario that you describe isn't at all uncommon and the root cause of it is that the parameters selected are not appropriate. Just because you successfully calibrate is no guarantee that the guiding will be successful. You haven't provided nearly enough information for anyone to actually help you with this either. I would suggest that you check the group archives as Roland has explained the mount parameters needed a number of times. Then it is up to you to provide the following. 1) A known good Autoguider Cable 2) Accurate Polar Alignment 3) Reasonable Parameter Settings for the ST-4. I can assure you that both of my ST-4's worked well with my AP900 Mount. The situation that you describe indicate that the feedback loop is out of kilter. Assuming that the Polar Alignment is good enough. Regards Bill -- William R. Mattil : http://www.celestial-images.com
|
|
Re: AP 900 problem
Michael Cater <nitemike1@...>
Thank you, for your input. I have a feeling that it's an ST4 problem.
Mike chris1011@... wrote: In a message dated 2/14/2008 10:36:37 AM Central Standard Time, nitemike1@... writes: I have had no problem with the calibration function of the ST4 as long as I1) In the old days when I was using one of these beasts, I figured out quite quickly that I could not determine anything by looking at the numbers. I placed a crosshair eyepiece on a seperate telescope, and while the ST4 was doing its thing, I monitored the prosition of the star on the crosshair. So, if you don't start out with this fundamental concept, you will probably be in the dark. Start by watching the star motion when you calibrate. Is the star actually moving in the 2 directions N-S and E-W? Next, press the 4 direction buttons. Does the star actually move when you do this? If you don't do these things, then you might as well forget trying to work with the ST4. 2) Your symptoms do not indicate periodic error. They do not indicate any kind of mount electronics error besides maybe a slight polar misalignment (which is not a mount problem). They indicate simply that the ST4 is probably not sending any correction signals to the mount, and the star is simply drifting slowly away from the center (stars will always drift for a variety of reasons not related to the mount electronics, so this is quite normal). Finally, your heading is misleading. It should not read "AP 900 Mount problem", rather it should say "SBIG ST4 Problem". Rolando ************** The year's hottest artists on the red carpet at the Grammy Awards. Go to AOL Music. (http://music.aol.com/grammys?NCID=aolcmp00300000002565) --------------------------------- Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! Search.
|
|
Re: Mach 1
jimhp29401us <thefamily111@...>
I definately know what I am doing when I use an AP mount. I
presently own an AP 6OO GOTO, a 9OO GOTO a 12OO GOTO and a 12OO QMD. I am selling the AP 6OO Goto so I can buy a Mach1. I often carry my AP 155 F/7 out and do a very rough polar alignment from my backyard where you can NOT see Polaris. By synchronizing on the first few objects I am able to find whatever I am looking for. As for webcam imaging being incredibly simple and that once you've done Mars, Jupiter and Saturn you are pretty much done, all I can do is laugh. These planets change, often nightly. If you try to get images like Alan, and I do, it is not "easy". There is an art and a science to it. I can imagine Deep Sky imaging is great fun. I did it for a while with an SBIG ST-6 years ago. I prefer the Sun, Moon and planets. All the Best, JIm Phillips do not give the best results.goto's might smack your scope into the pier one day otherwise. Besides, ifpolar alignment. If I work at it with my PAS v3 for a bit, maybe 5 minutes15 to 20 minute shots. For some reason my PAS v4 isn't quite as nicelyto be in the FOV. It really doesn't take that long to do a rough polaron and manually slewing the scope (push-to) then polar alignmentmatters not other than if I want to use a star atlas to combination star hopto have it polar aligned and powered up no matter what my plans are forpolar thealignment. You don't need to be that accurately alighned to use whateverGOTO. You just center then Syn on objects (Go to bright objects ofyou are looking for in that area of the sky. For webcam imaging keepthe moon, sun and planets you do not need precise polar alignment overthe object on your laptop screen while imaging. It can roam all processingthe screen as long as it stays on and you have no problem out toin registax. onethe sheltered spot I usually try to observe from and set it up.Next 5minutes is spent bringing out the Mach1 mount and attaching it,goingback in and getting the counterweights, and shaft is another 5another 5 roughlyofthe other trips another 5 minutes, all in all, about a 25 to 30 it ispolar align using the PAS so that I can goto all over the sky poweranother 10 minutes to get the keypad, cables, power supply, alwayscord, PAS and roughly polar align so that objects pretty much wouldend up somewhere in a low power eyepiece view. there istakeabout 10 minutes less since there are no counterweights and tripodno need to polar align. A quick alignment on a couple of brightstarsand away you go. Of course one could get away with a lighter tripodwhich means that there could be one less trip to make since relative.andhead could be managed in one trip quite easily. It is all forIsthat reduction of 10 or 15 minutes worth spending another $2500 go"aDM6 and rigid lightweight tripod for a very marginal "grab and in oneset-up on top of the purchase of the Mach1 and pier? I usuallyreservethe meaning of a "grab and go" as a complete unit, manageable openpiece with two hands most of the time but one when necessary to applydoors. The DM6 nor the Mach1 nor any of their kinfolk need not lightweightin my mind. This is the purview of a small 60 to 80mm Plunkscope on a lightweight alt-az or GE on a lightweight tripod. roughlyitdown and if a GE plunk it down with the polar axis pointing batterynorth. Since most of these small GE mounts use C or D cell opticalpacks, flick the switch and you should be tracking. Use the on thefinder or unit finder or attached laser pointer to locate thesubjectand look into the eyepiece. toMach1 with a really light tripod to hold everything and attempt but Igetit all out the door without damaging myself or anything else parts. Thejust don't think it would be a very useful combination of treated asMach1GTO is a high quality mount and I think it should be worthsuch. There are lots of capabilities built in and they are set up.using. Another 5Another 30 minutes to polar align, focus, flat frame, etc. nothingto 15 minutes to get on the object, get a guide star, set up the attachedtoimaging in less than an hour and a half I usually consider it amiracle. level, IFit would take far less time. Then again taking it another andIhad an observatory it might only take as long as opening the Time,gofind a subject to image. It's all relative. thingsivanong@ writes:The Mach1GTO takes a while to set up and take down. Many intotoscrew and tighten- will take you about 40 min or so.Really? Only takes me 5 minutes to set up my Mach 1. Plunk it insertthe pier,tighten 3 hand knobs, attach scope to the dovetail plate, eyepiece,look. What am I missing?
|
|
Re: Mach 1 - delivery
jimhp29401us <thefamily111@...>
My notification from AP says beginning March continuing up to several
months after. Jim Phillips Dear all, is there anybody here that has an update about thebeginning of delivery of the current production run of Mach 1? I transferred the deposit to Anacortes some months ago, last rumors I heard was that they expected to receive some units from the end of January but have had no more news about it.. Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
|
|