Re: APCC pointing model effects on DEC tracking
david w pearson
Thanks Ray! Another question......what kind of problems might i see if i accidently left the pointing model running during a camera guiding calibration and running of pempro? I think i had a brain fart and forgot to turn off. thanks dave
On Tuesday, February 23, 2021, 06:39:10 PM PST, Ray Gralak <iogroups@...> wrote:
Hi Dave, The initial dec tracking error is probably just dec backlash runout. Until the backlash is taken up the dec axis wasn’t moving despite the non-zero dec tracking rate. Regarding pointing accuracy, try opening APPM and doing a plate solve and recal with APPM. If that doesn’t help it may be time to create a new model. -Ray > -----Original Message----- > From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of david w pearson via groups.io > Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2021 2:29 PM > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io > Subject: Re: [ap-gto] APCC pointing model effects on DEC tracking > > sorry for confusion......AP1200. > I understand that the APCC pointing model not only improved pointing but helped tracking according to Ray. > I experienced it myself after creating a pointing model. > Since i have an issue that involves APCC pointing model, maxim DL guiding, and AP1200 i need to understand > APCC part in the process to determine how to resolve. I thought that APCC issues delta mount RA/DEC > commands according to the pointing model. > My question is does these delta RA/DEC commands require a convergence over time or not? > Meaning if the polar alignment error was vastly different from what the pointing models assumes, what > happens and how does APCC and mount behave? > thanks > dave > > > > On Tuesday, February 23, 2021, 10:23:52 AM PST, Roland Christen via groups.io > <chris1011=aol.com@groups.io> wrote: > > > > > The DEC axis tracking error grows up to about 2-3 arc-sec tracking error > > The Dec axis doesn't track. There is no tracking in Dec, only the RA axis tracks at sidereal rate. Do you mean > Dec Guiding by any chance? > > APCC pointing model does not set custom tracking unless you turn on the custom rate in APPM. > > Which mount are we talking about? > > > Rolando > > -----Original Message----- > From: david w pearson via groups.io <p.davidw=yahoo.com@groups.io> > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io > Sent: Tue, Feb 23, 2021 11:43 am > Subject: [ap-gto] APCC pointing model effects on DEC tracking > > > > Notice something new with my autoguiding, Maxim DL,APCC pointing model setup upon initial guiding during > startup. thereafter it doesn't happen. > The DEC axis tracking error grows up to about 2-3 arc-sec tracking error before converging back to normal at > 0.1 to 0.3 arcsec in about 60 seconds. > During this time, i use an aggressiveness of 10 In maxim DL. Does the APCC pointing model tracking > algorithm try to compensation for DEC tracking > errors, using the pointing model, that would account for the 60 sec tracking error convergence? Also i have > noticed that my pointing point model probably needs to be redone as > my pointing errors seem to be worse than right after model build. My first impression is my polar alignment > may be further off than the pointing model is assuming? > Any insight that would direct me toward the solution would be appreciated. > thanks > dave > > -- > Roland Christen > Astro-Physics >
|
|