> Yes, there was an ASCOM 6.5RC2.
That's not what you wrote... You wrote "SP2", not "RC2".
(SP = Service Pack) (RC = Release Candidate)
They have completely different meanings.
-Ray Gralak
Author of PEMPro
Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
https://www.astro-physics.com/apcc-proAuthor of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver:
https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver> -----Original Message-----
> From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [
mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Yves Laroche
> Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 6:47 PM
> To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
> Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Do NOT use ASCOM Platform v. 6.5 with APCC Pro #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver
>
> Hi Ray,
>
> Yes, there was an ASCOM 6.5RC2. Just checked the GitHub web site but no executable file found anymore even
> if it's written 6.5RC2.
>
> I already got this file on my USB key and initiated an installation to be sure it is version 6.5RC2 and it was. This
> was the version with I've tested APPM last night but without success.
>
> Regards,
> Yves
>
> .
>
> Le 31/10/20 21:35, Ray Gralak <groups3@...> a écrit :
>
> Hi Yves,
>
> > Did a point run last night and got bad results with ASCOM 6.5 SP2. Downgraded to version ASCOM
> 6.4RC1 and
> > everything went fine.
>
> I am not sure what you mean... there is no ASCOM 6.5 SP2. Did you mean SP1?
>
> > You mentioned ASCOM 6.5 SP1 beta version but I'm a bit confused. Is the beta 6.5RC1 version the
> same as
> > non-beta 6.5RC1?
>
> You'll have to ask that question on the ASCOM group. I haven't been keeping track of the changes they
> make. I was told the link I posted is to the 6.5 SP1 beta.
>
> -Ray Gralak
> Author of PEMPro
> Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
https://www.astro-physics.com/apcc-pro> Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver:
https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [
mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Yves Laroche
> > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 2:19 PM
> > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
> > Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Do NOT use ASCOM Platform v. 6.5 with APCC Pro #APCC #ASCOM_V2_Driver
> >
> > Hi Ray,
> >
> > Did a point run last night and got bad results with ASCOM 6.5 SP2. Downgraded to version ASCOM
> 6.4RC1 and
> > everything went fine.
> >
> > You mentioned ASCOM 6.5 SP1 beta version but I'm a bit confused. Is the beta 6.5RC1 version the
> same as
> > non-beta 6.5RC1?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Yves
> >
> >
> >
> > Le 31/10/20 12:31, Ray Gralak <groups3@...> a écrit :
> >
> > Hi Andrew,
> >
> > > If you could provide an update on when this issue will be
> > > fixed that would be great.
> >
> > Actually, I reported on this a couple of weeks ago. ASCOM 6.5 Service Pack 1 will fix the bug (which is
> in
> > ASCOM, not APCC).
> >
> > However, if you want to try the beta version of ASCOM 6.5 SP1, which I have tested and confirmed has
> the
> > fix, then here is the link:
> >
> >
https://download.ascom-standards.org/beta/ASCOMPlatform65.exe> >
> > -Ray Gralak
> > Author of PEMPro
> > Author of APCC (Astro-Physics Command Center):
https://www.astro-physics.com/apcc-pro> > Author of Astro-Physics V2 ASCOM Driver:
https://www.siriusimaging.com/apdriver> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: main@ap-gto.groups.io [
mailto:main@ap-gto.groups.io] On Behalf Of Andrew Jones
> > > Sent: Saturday, October 31, 2020 2:20 AM
> > > To: main@ap-gto.groups.io
> > > Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Do NOT use ASCOM Platform v. 6.5 with APCC Pro #APCC
> #ASCOM_V2_Driver
> > >
> > > Hi Howard.
> > >
> > > I spent half the night trying to create a new APPM model using ASCOM 6.5 and getting the same plate
> > solve
> > > results for every image. I was about to post the issue here, when I saw your post. Any eta on when
> this
> > issue will
> > > be resolved? I am kind of caught in a catch-22 at the moment as the latest version of SGP and other
> > software I
> > > am using to control my rig now requires ASCOM 6.5. If you could provide an update on when this
> issue
> > will be
> > > fixed that would be great.
> > >
> > > Andrew J
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>