Re: C11HD on Mach2

Home Guidelines Messages Hashtags Subgroups

Stuart <stuart.j.heggie@...> #71786 Dominique, these are all exceptional. I could not get any of your links to work but went to Astrobin and found you and the images there. Stuart Heggie http://www.stuartheggie.com/ toggle quoted messageShow quoted text On Mon, 20 Jul 2020 at 05:26, Dominique Durand via groups.io <dom33.durand=yahoo.com@groups.io> wrote: Hi, Here is a little feedback on the use of my Mach2. The modeling goes pretty well with SGP / Platesolve2. After photoshoots with the AP130GT, I switched to the C11HD with still use without autoguiding. With 1960 focal length with the reducer or 2800 focal length without the reducer, the quality of monitoring must be up to par. Here are 2 clusters M13 and M92 made with exposures of 60 seconds and a galaxy NGC6384 made with exposures of 180 seconds. The problems to be solved are more at the level of C11 than Mach2. M13 [URL=https://astrob.in/full/h1sgqo/0/][IMG]https://astrob.in/h1sgqo/0/rawthumb/gallery/get.jpg?insecure[/IMG][/URL] M92 [URL=https://astrob.in/full/vfeboh/0/][IMG]https://astrob.in/vfeboh/0/rawthumb/gallery/get.jpg?insecure[/IMG][/URL] NGC6384 [URL=https://astrob.in/full/5c5wt2/0/][IMG]https://astrob.in/5c5wt2/0/rawthumb/gallery/get.jpg?insecure[/IMG][/URL] Happy amateur astronut Dominique -- Stuart http://www.astrofoto.ca/stuartheggie/
More All Messages By This Member

Join main@ap-gto.groups.io to automatically receive all group messages.