Re: Which to Choose; Absolute Encoders or 92 mm Stowaway
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Why not just reissue the Mach 1? No development needed, just manufacturing capacity. All of the tooling is there. It's a much lower price point than the M2. If the manufacturing capacity is not there, farm out the job to another US based shop.
Sent via the Samsung Galaxy Note9, an AT&T 5G Evolution capable smartphone
I would love it if you made another smaller mount. Hopefully one as accurate as the Mach1. I picked up a small iOptron CEM40 as a little grab and go mount that complements my 1100. Its so light and easy to setup, its a pleasure. It’ll easily carry 25 lbs for imaging. I got this because there was nothing from AP in this size, but I sure wish there was. Please make another small one…maybe a little brother to the Mach1. Dont need encoders on something that small, just something as accurate as the Mach1 would be great!
-------- Original message --------
From: "David via groups.io" <phrosty5@...>
Date: 4/23/20 2:41 PM (GMT-08:00)
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Which to Choose; Absolute Encoders or 92 mm Stowaway
Plus, you now have a price point hole where the Mach1 was before.