- Pointing Model vs. OAG with PHD2
Re: Pointing Model vs. OAG with PHD2
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
The idea is to do unguiding. I can do about 60s now but would prefer to do 120s unguided.
Weather bad now so I am at a standstill at the moment. The mount connects with PHD2 but no focus achieved, so no calibration. I have no idea why. Anyway, I agree that once the guide cam is in focus, it should remain that way but at times things seem to shift with the integrated OAG/filter wheel setup that I have. I like it in that it is one piece of hardware vs two but for whatever reason(s), I seem to have to readjust things once in a while despite nothing shifting or moving. That is why I want to at least explore this option which may not be a better way.
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 10:49 AM Brian Valente <bvalente@...
this is more from a PHD perspective (and also i know you've had some posts at SX forum)
Is your idea that you want to do unguided imaging vs. guided?
It seems you have an issue that is unresolved and you are still looking for the root cause, but once it's solved, you would not be refocusing your camera at all. just gotta figure out what's causing it
On Thu, Apr 23, 2020 at 7:37 AM Bruce Donzanti <donza2735@...
I would feedback from those doing pointing models if would be advantageous for me to try it based on my specific setup on stick with OAG.
I am in a permanent observatory above my garage roof which is about 12 feet above street level. In the observatory, my C11" EdgeHD (with an 80mm piggybacked onto it) is on an AP1100 which is on top of a Pier Tech adjustable steel pier (can be raised 18 inches). The steel pier lies on top of a cement pier that runs down below street level. So, the scope itself is about 8 ft above the observatory floor, requiring me to use safety ladder to get to it but just about everything is automated now with few exceptions. My setup is well built, has excellent polar alignment and cable management. I would have to recheck my PE on my 1.5 year old AP1100. For guiding, I have been using PHD2 with an OAG for about 2 years but I find it to be finicky and I often have to get up on the ladder to re-focus the guide camera (one of the few non-automated steps). Seeing and transparency in my area is generally not very good and I do not get many clear nights. Typically, my seeing is around below average/average with many nights of poor and few above average/excellent. I am thinking of using the 80mm as the guide scope for the C11 since it has an autofocuser but I am still dealing with PHD2 and my so-so skies.
With this as an introduction, would taking the time to learn to build a pointing model save me a lot of aggravation (i.e.,up and own on the ladder for the OAG adjustments or using the less effective 80mm) in the long run or am I just exchanging one set of problems for potential another set? Would a pointing model be more or less advantageous for guiding in my sky conditions or just the same as using an OAG approach?
Join firstname.lastname@example.org to automatically receive all group messages.