Re: Unguided imaging with Mach2
toggle quoted message Show quoted text
Yes, PE correction would definitely make the unguided imaging model work properly. Without that you will have periodic error as well as drift and making a tracking model would make no sense. In order to get no drift in Ra during a 5 or 10 minute exposure, your mount must be capable of having very low periodic error. In a non-encoder mount that can only happen if you have a PE curve that can compensate for the PE of your mount.
From: Wayne Hixson via Groups.Io <wayneh9026@...>
To: main <email@example.com>
Sent: Sat, Dec 28, 2019 1:25 pm
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Unguided imaging with Mach2
For someone with a Mach1 and no encoders, would it make sense to run PEC along with the model?
On Dec 28, 2019, at 11:05 AM, uncarollo2 <chris1011@...> via Groups.Io <chris1011@...> wrote: