Re: Maximum SAFE shimming thickness under a DOVELM162 clamp set ?
The offset between the RCOS inner-truss mounting points and the outer-truss
toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
mounting points is one flex point but I suspect that there is another nasty one in the RCOS primary mirror mounting system. They are both likely-fixable but I am not sure it would be worth the effort and expense when software can make up for it rather easily. Christopher Erickson Consulting Engineer Summit Kinetics Waikoloa, HI 96738 www.summitkinetics.com
-----Original Message-----
From: ap-gto@... [mailto:ap-gto@...] Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 6:06 AM To: ap-gto@... Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Maximum SAFE shimming thickness under a DOVELM162 clamp set ? Ray, and Chris Erickson, I think you are bang on ! It must most likely be "truss flexure". Thinking further last night, about how this DEC shift could come about, I can see a "Non-orthogonality of the Optical and Polar axes" would most likely be caused by tube (truss) flexure. The optical axis, (for whatever reason), fails to intersect the mount's polar axis. at the centre of rotation. Chris once mentioned in his post, a "parallelogram type shift" in the OTA truss poles. But, it should disappear if the flip is done at zenith, yet if anything, the DEC shift grew slightly larger. But, wouldn't a truss flex also result in a star's corresponding shift in RA, mimicking a DEC non-orthogonality? When I shimmed the OTA's DEC plate, the star's RA shift after meridian flip, has been hugely reduced, and can easily be brought to zero with a further shim. So, if the problem were purely truss flexure, then this DEC axle shimming, should not have had any effect. Or, just perhaps, a shifted positioning of the secondary spider ? Looking through my TAK alignment scope, I see the secondary mirror reflections of one pair of spider vanes "slightly shifted vertically" from their corresponding reflections in the primary mirror. Thierry Legault's document on "Collimating mirrors using the TAK Scope", points out this spider shift anomaly. Unfortunately, all attempts to even up this spider vane pair, showed no change no matter how far I decentered the spider. I concluded that the spider, in this case, was not the cause of my problem. Thank you gentlemen. I see I have a lot more investigation ahead of me. The problem, whatever the cause, seems to involve polar axis non-orthogonality. Perhaps, in the case of a truss, not much can be done, other than coming close, and resorting to a pointing model. Joe ------------------------------------ Posted by: "Joseph Zeglinski" <J.Zeglinski@...> ------------------------------------ To UNSUBSCRIBE, or for general information on the ap-gto list see http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ap-gto ------------------------------------ Yahoo Groups Links
|
|