Re: An easier Pasillx N & S Polar Alignment method
Chuck Hancock
Hey Joe,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The concept you should know here is that the OTA doesn't need to be orthogonal. You only need the finder scope orthogonal to the mount (not the OTA) in order to polar align the mount's RA axis. Suppose for a moment that your scope OTA, finder scope, and mount are all three orthogonal and all three perfectly polar aligned. So your tracking is "dead nuts". Add to that a camera that you want to photograph any object in the sky. You can mount the camera to the scope, piggyback on the mounting rings and point it in ANY direction in the sky. As long as the scope is tracking, the camera will track as well, as it too is rotating about the pole (and the RA axis). It points at an independent target, but still benefits from the tracking of the scope. The fact that it is on a different target makes no difference at all. Try setting up your mount and do it yourself to prove it. It really helps to see it on the mount, even if you just set up indoors. Go back now to the situation that was described in the procedure to kick off this branch of the discussion ("Howard and myself..."). The finder scope helps gets the mount aligned. The OTA is a little off. No big deal. Go to the target object, center the object, then do a realign (or not). Start your camera exposure, and the mount and OTA will track just right even thought the finder is not pointing at exactly the same spot as the scope. The only time the orthogonality of the OTA will make a difference here is when your mount flips to the other side of the sky, that is, when you goto a different object. Then the pointing will be off by twice the orthogonality error. In the case of the OTA, just a half a degree (2x 15 arc minutes). In the case of our imaginary piggyback camera, who knows where! Best regards, Chuck Hancock Joseph Zeglinski wrote: Hi Rick, |
|