Re: Anyone designed a limit switch or similar to prvent pier col...
Joe Zeglinski
Mark,
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
Just one question though. How will you figure out, automatically, which axis caused the collision with the pier? You can't reverse both motors, since if the RA caused the hit, for example, reversing the DEC which was in a good position, might get into more collisions. If the AP was slewing with both motors, perhaps it's best to stop, issue the alarms, and let the human figure out how to untangle the traffic mess. Stopping means another relay/breaker, to cut off all DC power to the mount. Drastic, but better than putting a ding in the pier :-( Actually, I faced this same quandary, when I designed my variation of the Mel Bartels stepper tracking system (Scope.exe). However, my circuit version knew which axis signals were sending stepper pulses to each motor, so it was simple to reverse individual motors, while activating (optional) user selected alarm devices. In your approach, you only know that the some part of the scope has started to strike the pier, so figuring out which way to reverse, is difficult. It will handle pier detection during tracking - one axis reversal - but I don't see how it can handle two axis slewing with reversal. Best to stop the mount altogether, in that situation. Joe ----- Original Message -----
From: "Mark Squicquero" <docsquic@...> To: <ap-gto@...> Sent: Friday, July 13, 2007 12:41 PM Subject: [ap-gto] Re: Anyone designed a limit switch or similar to prvent pier col... Joe, |
|