Re: Balance Procedure
Hi Roland,toggle quoted messageShow quoted text
Not knowing the centre of gravity of your (160/F7.5) OTA, but assuming it
is at mid point (23.6 inches), that would be approximately a moment of 189
O.K. that is a useful working example to know, to judge our own OTA
I am a bit surprised that AP uses "weight" instead of "moment (torque)"
when talking about imbalance. I found the same terminology used on page 23 of
the AP900 user manual: Troubleshooting - (additional explanation) - "It
typically takes about 4 lb. of unbalance to trip the overload circuit ...
This is a "weight", not a "moment arm" reference, which really depends on
which OTA you are using on the mount. A long OTA with 4 lbs is different from
a short SCT with the same 4 lbs. of unbalance.
As for not being concerned about "damaging the worm gear teeth", once
again, the user manual page 15 - RA & DEC Clutch Knobs: "3: How tight can they
"You should not attempt to push your scope by hand against this locked up
resistance, or undue stress will be placed on the worm wheel/worm an
My concern arose from reading that section in the mount set-up manual. In
using the mount for astrophotography, it is "recommended" to tighten the
clutches a bit more (1/8 turn by wrench). An overly "unbalanced OTA" may
introduce the same stress situation as "pushing the mount by hand", as
described in the manual. No "guideline" is given about how many "inch-lbs of
torque", potentially from OTA imbalance, are considered crossing the line on
too much stress on the worm gear.
Of course, the safest bet is to minimize any imbalance, as best as one
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:47 AM
Subject: Re: [ap-gto] Balance Procedure
In a message dated 4/25/2007 9:21:36 AM Central Daylight Time,